Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by PackLandVA:

Pete Carroll looks like a 60 year old lesbian.  Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Very kind of you to be tolerant of Fedya.

 

Originally Posted by Fond Du Arrigo:

I want to hate Richard Sherman, but whenever I see an interview with him, I can't help but like him.

 

If he wore the Green and Gold I think we'd love everything about him.

#trending

Originally Posted by Fond Du Arrigo:

I want to hate Richard Sherman, but whenever I see an interview with him, I can't help but like him.

 

If he wore the Green and Gold I think we'd love everything about him.

Help me out here. Any recent Packers that have a similar onfield persona, that is, an insufferable, arrogant, preening asshole?

I think you'd find it in your heart to accept him, if he performed. Just a hunch.

 

That's the main point, however. I see how he acts on the field, and I want to hate everything about him. When he talks off the field, I find out he's actually  really smart, and pretty funny too. He kind of has a Muhammad Ali quality about him.

Last edited by Fond Du Arrigo

I'd rather see the Cardinals win tonight, even though they'd take the #1 seed. I just don't think the Rams can win in Seattle next week, and I'd rather see the Packers play in Arizona if they have to go on the road for the NFCCG. I'd be perfectly satisfied with the #2 seed so long as Seattle doesn't get the #1 seed.

Super intelligent guy, but he can be beat. He's not some invincible CB. I like anyone that can run their mouth & back it up. I laugh at all the Niner fans that hate him, if he was a Niner, the entire fan base would love him.

 

Sherman is NOT Packer people. If he was, TT would've drafted him.

 

Jordy beat Revis &, if MM let's him, he'll beat Sherman too.

The whole Packer People thing is kind of overblown, IMO. I don't think being demonstrative on the field or a trash talker necessarily disqualifies you from that designation.

 

Maybe TT was all set to draft Sherman, but the Seahawks took him first. Who can say?

 

I agree that he can be beat. The idea to not throw his way in the opener was absurd. Our QB is better at his position than Sherman is at his. And, we have a couple WRs that aren't half bad either. Half the field will not be surrendered if there's a post season rematch.

Originally Posted by Pack-Man:

I'd rather see the Cardinals win tonight, even though they'd take the #1 seed. I just don't think the Rams can win in Seattle next week, and I'd rather see the Packers play in Arizona if they have to go on the road for the NFCCG. I'd be perfectly satisfied with the #2 seed so long as Seattle doesn't get the #1 seed.

We match up pretty poorly against BOTH.

Originally Posted by Fond Du Arrigo:

       

The whole Packer People thing is kind of overblown, IMO. I don't think being demonstrative on the field or a trash talker necessarily disqualifies you from that designation.

 

Maybe TT was all set to draft Sherman, but the Seahawks took him first. Who can say?

 

I agree that he can be beat. The idea to not throw his way in the opener was absurd. Our QB is better at his position than Sherman is at his. And, we have a couple WRs that aren't half bad either. Half the field will not be surrendered if there's a post season rematch.


       
Because Ted Thompson drafted Davon House and left Sherman on the board, thats how we know
Originally Posted by cuqui:
Originally Posted by Fond Du Arrigo:

I want to hate Richard Sherman, but whenever I see an interview with him, I can't help but like him.

 

If he wore the Green and Gold I think we'd love everything about him.

Help me out here. Any recent Packers that have a similar onfield persona, that is, an insufferable, arrogant, preening asshole?

 

Jermichael Finley.

 

Case closed.

Originally Posted by Goalline:
Originally Posted by Pack-Man:

I'd rather see the Cardinals win tonight, even though they'd take the #1 seed. I just don't think the Rams can win in Seattle next week, and I'd rather see the Packers play in Arizona if they have to go on the road for the NFCCG. I'd be perfectly satisfied with the #2 seed so long as Seattle doesn't get the #1 seed.

We match up pretty poorly against BOTH.

I'm not too worried about Ryan Lindley and whatever group of second tier RBs Arizona has at RB. I am worried about Russell Wilson and Marshawn Lynch (particularly in Seattle), though.

Last edited by Pack-Man
Originally Posted by Pack-Man:
Originally Posted by Goalline:
Originally Posted by Pack-Man:

I'd rather see the Cardinals win tonight, even though they'd take the #1 seed. I just don't think the Rams can win in Seattle next week, and I'd rather see the Packers play in Arizona if they have to go on the road for the NFCCG. I'd be perfectly satisfied with the #2 seed so long as Seattle doesn't get the #1 seed.

We match up pretty poorly against BOTH.

I'm not too worried about Ryan Lindley and whatever group of second tier RBs Arizona has at RB. I am worried about Russell Wilson and Marshawn Lynch (particularly in Seattle), though.

Arizona runs the ball better than we can stop. Not worried about Wilson as a passer. As a runner, watch out. 

Originally Posted by Fond Du Arrigo:

I think you'd find it in your heart to accept him, if he performed. Just a hunch.

 

That's the main point, however. I see how he acts on the field, and I want to hate everything about him. When he talks off the field, I find out he's actually  really smart, and pretty funny too. He kind of has a Muhammad Ali quality about him.

Jesus ****....someone cut him off

Originally Posted by YooperPackfan:
 
Because Ted Thompson drafted Davon House and left Sherman on the board, thats how we know

TT took House, therefore Sherman isn't "Packer People"

 

Don't want to get in a logic debate with you, but...

Originally Posted by Goalline:
Arizona runs the ball better than we can stop.

Arizona started the game with 1181 yards on the ground in 14 games (and 3.3 yards per carry), not very good. That's almost on the level of the 1991 Lindy Infante Packers. If the Packers can't stop that, they may as well start making plans for the offseason right now.

Last edited by Pack-Man
Originally Posted by BartManDude:

What about a tie tonight and then a San fran win next week?

Yeah.

 

And maybe the Hindenburg will crash into the stadium too.

Originally Posted by Pack-Man:
Originally Posted by Goalline:
Arizona runs the ball better than we can stop.

Arizona started the game with 1181 yards on the ground in 14 games (and 3.3 yards per carry), not very good. That's almost on the level of the 1991 Lindy Infante Packers. If the Packers can't stop that, they may as well start making plans for the offseason right now.

I'm convinced.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×