Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

fightphoe93 posted:

I realize Irvin is not the bastion of moral integrity, but in this case, I kind of want to see how it plays out a bit before I put Irvin anywhere near the Sharper category.   

Even if Irvin is guilty of doing this once, he's still in the Sharper category. If you do this for decades, you rise to the Cosby category.

I'll wait to see the result of this charge, but it's worth noting that Irvin has already settled an earlier allegation of sexual assault out of court. Usually, that's a "guilty but I'll pay you to keep your mouth shut" result. If it walks like a duck...

MichiganPacker posted:

Even if Irvin is guilty of doing this once, he's still in the Sharper category. If you do this for decades, you rise to the Cosby category.

I actually agree with you on this.  I always wanted to believe Irvin was at least a slightly "reformed" guy, but perhaps he still has a little too much of a flawed personality to ever be completely turned around.  That said, I am holding out hope that maybe it's a scorned chick looking for a money grab or revenge... 

 

In Sharper's case, there were so many of them, it was obvious what was really going on.  Maybe that will be the case with Irvin too, I just think it's early to call it that way though.

He is a POS.  If true, we at least won't see him on TV anymore.  Why any network would want him representing them is beyond me.  No child should watch TV and look up to this scumbag. **** him!

Marv could dress in drag and parade around MSG in his skivvies (yes, wearing women's underwear is part of his turn on) and it wouldn't matter to me. 

The guy has a voice from God and might be one of the best basketball announcers ever.  

(Marv Albert voice)

{Scottie Pippin slam dunk}

OHHHH! and Pippin. ...with the FACIAL!! And Patrick Ewing did NOT appreciate it!!

(Marv voice off)

Last edited by Boris

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×