Rodgers to spend the bye week with Lacy.
Not bad. That's an MVP "6-pack" there
Originally Posted by Hungry5:
The image on the left is skinny Eddie, on the left is fat Eddie.
Let me guess. The fat one was from his rookie year.
They were taken about 3 weeks apart IIRC.
Now here is the real skinny Eddie, from his high school days
Originally Posted by Hungry5:
Clearly fake. In the real conversation MM drops all kinds of hints trying to get Lacy to invite him to dinner.
Nutri-System, dum-dums.
Do it Eddie, do it.
Originally Posted by Hungry5:
They were taken about 3 weeks apart IIRC.
3 weeks equals 63 meals
Now he's a drug trafficker.
We generally don't tolerate that sort of behavior in Florida.
If he was maturbating outside of a McDonalds, sure.
The Big Mac. Two all beef patties, special sau... ah, nevermind.
Originally Posted by Hungry5:
The image on the left is skinny Eddie, on the left is fat Eddie.
Minus the ten pounds that the camera adds
, the one on the right is Eddie today!
Forget a "Balanced Attack" (giving Starks more carries) how about a balanced diet?
Biggest threat to this years team (I wish we had polls again)(that's what she said)?
Eddie and french fries
The Professor and reading comprehension
Dom Capers and blaming the offence for making his squad take the field so much
Dom Capers and yards don't matter
Micah Hyde and Ted Thompson's draft
Wide receivers in the backfield
Quareless and Packer People
Datone Jones and Nick Perry and talant
Clay Matthews and his hair
Clay Matthews and only caring about his stats
The answer is clearly "C- All of the above."
This team is ****ed
Originally Posted by The Ref fka Blair Kiel:
Nutri-System, dum-dums.
Do it Eddie, do it.
I've been hitting that since I was 12 or 13...and I have the palm hair to prove it.
Originally Posted by The Ref fka Blair Kiel:
Nutri-System, dum-dums.
Do it Eddie, do it.
Beef would hit the cow version.
Originally Posted by oldschool:
I've been hitting that since I was 12 or 13...and I have the palm hair to prove it.
Have you been fisting ewoks?
Cut the guy. Running backs are a dime a dozen. Gotta be a couple ex-Badger RB's available. Not sure why this coaching staff doesn't read more message boards.
awesomeness
1 - a flop
2 - opponent says, get the **** up you pussy
3 - i don't need a stretcher
4 - get on the stretcher bitch
5 - ****, you're too heavy
6 - ah, **** it, wipes hands
It's quite obvious Aaron Rodgers is best suited for the Wishbone. On third and long they could bust out the Wing-T.
It's clear to me now, a beefed up Lacy is the lead blocker for Kuhn or Ripkowski for short-yardage wishbone formations.
Eddie's fat, Ditka farts. Circle of life!
Originally Posted by The Crusher:
So? Lacy worked equally hard this off season changing his weight by 20 lbs.
From today's McGinn:
James Starks took the first snap, officially giving him the start, but Eddie Lacy replaced him for the next six plays. Rather than a slight, it appeared to be more of an acknowledgment that the coaches felt Starks was the better choice to run the opening toss off tackle. It gained 25 yards in part because it was beautifully blocked but also because Starks beat FS Eric Weddle to the break point. He gained 19 yards after that. Would Lacy have got there fast enough to deny Weddle a clean shot? At his weight, probably not. Some personnel people guess he's in the 260-pound range.
Originally Posted by YATittle:
From today's McGinn:
James Starks took the first snap, officially giving him the start, but Eddie Lacy replaced him for the next six plays. Rather than a slight, it appeared to be more of an acknowledgment that the coaches felt Starks was the better choice to run the opening toss off tackle. It gained 25 yards in part because it was beautifully blocked but also because Starks beat FS Eric Weddle to the break point. He gained 19 yards after that. Would Lacy have got there fast enough to deny Weddle a clean shot? At his weight, probably not. Some personnel people guess he's in the 260-pound range.
I think its great that we have Starks yet think its a waste of talent to not be able to use the player we drafted in the second round because he is now built more like a fullback. 260lbs is just too much! I guess that means we now have three fullbacks. Now lacy can catch the ball well so now we can also use him as a shorter tight end. I believe that we will survive with him at this weight this year. I just think its a shame to waste such a great talent because of his lack of conditioning. I hope that as winter arrives he gets to show his stuff.
Don't recall all this ridiculous talk about Lacy when he ran for 90 yards in 18 carries against the Niners. It's going to be a very long bye week.
att/yards/avg.
12/34/2.8
13/43/3.3
11/36/3.3
17/48/2.8
There's Phat Eddie's numbers from the first four games last year.
Originally Posted by PackerPatrick:
Originally Posted by YATittle:
From today's McGinn:
James Starks took the first snap, officially giving him the start, but Eddie Lacy replaced him for the next six plays. Rather than a slight, it appeared to be more of an acknowledgment that the coaches felt Starks was the better choice to run the opening toss off tackle. It gained 25 yards in part because it was beautifully blocked but also because Starks beat FS Eric Weddle to the break point. He gained 19 yards after that. Would Lacy have got there fast enough to deny Weddle a clean shot? At his weight, probably not. Some personnel people guess he's in the 260-pound range.
I think its great that we have Starks yet think its a waste of talent to not be able to use the player we drafted in the second round because he is now built more like a fullback. 260lbs is just too much! I guess that means we now have three fullbacks. Now lacy can catch the ball well so now we can also use him as a shorter tight end. I believe that we will survive with him at this weight this year. I just think its a shame to waste such a great talent because of his lack of conditioning. I hope that as winter arrives he gets to show his stuff.
You sound kind of creepy being this obsessed with Eddie's weight. Wow. Is Marshawn Lynch too fat?
Aaron Rodgers is shorter than I thought.
Originally Posted by Hungry5:
awesomeness
1 - a flop
2 - opponent says, get the **** up you pussy
3 - i don't need a stretcher
4 - get on the stretcher bitch
5 - ****, you're too heavy
6 - ah, **** it, wipes hands
They should have these guys on the ready for every big soccer match. Maybe it will keep the faking to a minimum.
Originally Posted by Henry:
You'll cope.
I won't
Originally Posted by michiganjoe:
att/yards/avg.
12/34/2.8
13/43/3.3
11/36/3.3
17/48/2.8
There's Phat Eddie's numbers from the first four games last year.
And in the 6th game this year 3 carries 14 yards and a fumble!
Clearly Eddie needs The Boot. 30 consecutive running plays to start the next game. By the end of the season, he'll be in shape.
He ankle will be fine after the bye, he then will be able to get away from the buffett table.....problemS solved
Originally Posted by Tdog:
oh christ...
Originally Posted by Iowacheese:
Jesus ****!
Originally Posted by MEl-Ka-Bong:
Clearly Eddie needs The Boot. 30 consecutive running plays to start the next game. By the end of the season, he'll be in shape.
Originally Posted by Pikes Peak:
He ankle will be fine after the bye, he then will be able to get away from the buffett table.....problemS solved
I hope so. having a 260lb running back hit the defense full bore would scare me! Lets hope that our cold weather run game does just that.