Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

c'mon...it's over and over in a major way. and who cares what dilfer said (i didn't see it). however, i can only imagine the same stuff was talked about when steve young won. why do we even get worked up over any of this? packer fans live and breath this comparison. the rest of the world doesn't. it's an obvious talker when you have minutes upon minutes to talk....
Last edited by El-Ka-Bong
quote:
Originally posted by chickenboy:
c'mon...it's over and over in a major way. and who cares what dilfer said (i didn't see it). however, i can only imagine the same stuff was talked about when steve young won. why do we even get worked up over any of this? packer fans live and breath this comparison. the rest of the world doesn't. it's an obvious talker when you have minutes upon minutes to talk....
'

Really?! I'm pretty sure Niners fans would tell you **** off.

Funny, its "over" yet we still hear about it.
Too long ago, but was there this type of talk with Steve Young/Joe Montana? I seem to recall there was a lot of talk, but not to this degree. I guess it was a little different in that when they decided to go with Young he had quite a bit of experience and an MVP where as Rodgers didn't have much experience at all.

I just don't understand why this is still talked about. He's been gone 3 years.
Like I said, Henry.....I love the Favre coverage for the fact that everyone knows the Packers did the right thing. The topic stays fresh...and it sticks in the craw of my brother, who now hates the Packers because they got rid of Favre. That doesn't make me a Viking fan. My hate for that team only intensified the last two seasons.

The Favre coverage will go away as soon as fans have a "ho-hum" reaction to him. Is it really worth the offense?
quote:
Originally posted by BeerGuy:
Like I said, Henry.....I love the Favre coverage for the fact that everyone knows the Packers did the right thing. The topic stays fresh...and it sticks in the craw of my brother, who now hates the Packers because they got rid of Favre. That doesn't make me a Viking fan. My hate for that team only intensified the last two seasons.

The Favre coverage will go away as soon as fans have a "ho-hum" reaction to him. Is it really worth the offense?


So you found solice that Ass bag Dilfer waxed nostalgic about Bert and even made the inference that this Superbowl was connected to Bert.
quote:
Originally posted by XLV-Ka-Bong:
Nothing about this game was about Favre, why talk about him after the game?

CAP was spot on


Yeah....I disagree with you guys. The Packers got it right with Rodgers. Let's celebrate that. This coverage doesn't come at the expense of any of these guys. It only shows how great Rodgers is, and how good the team did in developing him and getting rid of a Hall of Fame QB when he wore out his stay.

Favre will stay a story as long as Packer fans want to talk about him.
quote:
This was not the time to discuss how great TOG is. That is insulting to AR and this team. If you don't understand that, then I don't know what to tell you.



That's how I feel about it. This was Rodgers and the teams greatest moment. AR played his ass of to accomplish this. They pretty much said AR was great but he's still no Favre. Insulting doesn't even begin to describe it.

BTW there is no way Favre was cheering for the Rodgers. His ego would not allow it.
quote:
Originally posted by BeerGuy:


Like I said, when is the Favre insecurity going to end with Packer fans? Aaron, Ted and Mike let it go a long time ago. I'm on that train.


Why is it insecurity vs. insult and how are you the one to make the delineation? Please tell me how a QB three years removed has anything to do with this championship? When you're done with that what point doesn't make you a ridiculous dick holding onto a phantom of a past?

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×