Skip to main content

Reply to "Rating QBs"

I think my rankings would go like this:

B (Rodgers?)

G (Montana)

A

D

F

E

C

Interestingly, the first five go in order of best average QB rating, but the last two do not. E and C are close there (average finish of 15.4 and 15.2), and are close on TD % (15.1 and 14.5 average finish). The kicker for me is their average finish by interceptions %. Again, they're similar, but QB E finishes, on average, 17th best, while QB C finishes 19th best. I want a guy that ranks better, against his peers, on interception % when the other metrics are so close. Nothing kills a team's chances to win like turning the ball over. That's why a guy like Aaron Rodgers is so lethal. That 4:1 + TD to INT ratio is huge. Of course, he benefits from modern rules that hamper defensive backs and pass rushes. But I think Rodgers would be highly successful in any era. That toughness, accuracy, mobility and swagger would translate in the 50s as it does now. 

 

 

Last edited by lambeausouth
×
×
×
×