Blair Kiel posted:Fedya posted:Phaedrus would like you to know that wanting to have sex with Dom's toupee is not deviant.
(Or were you suggesting that the therapy involves deviant sex?
)
That's one of those furry fetish's, ain't it?
Is there any other kind
phaedrus posted:Fedya posted:Phaedrus would like you to know that wanting to have sex with Dom's toupee is not deviant.
(Or were you suggesting that the therapy involves deviant sex?
Having you for a sponsor works wonders!
I would love to be a stuffed teddy bear on the wall for that meeting.
Gsands posted:What if the Bears would have taken the 10 second run off?
Yup. I'm sure they were thinking they were going to stop us, get the ball back with a chance to win.
Wild ending.
Whew!
Just got back from the bar and too lazy to look back in the thread, but I hope you guys did a proper amount of bitching over McSpupidFace not taking the field goal early in the game!
CAPackFan95 posted:94-94-6
+2 in point differential.
Gsands posted:What if the Bears would have taken the 10 second run off?
Rodgers still would have been able to spike the ball in time, I think.
phaedrus posted:Fedya posted:Phaedrus would like you to know that wanting to have sex with Dom's toupee is not deviant.
(Or were you suggesting that the therapy involves deviant sex?
Having you for a sponsor works wonders!
If you and the toupee are both consenting, why should I care what sort of freak you're getting on?
Royalties?
Listening to WTMJ post game show. Tausch said we win out we win the division. So we do control our own density.
If the Pack win out, they and Detroit will both be 10-6, and the Packers will have defeated Detroit twice for the head-to-head tiebreaker.
bvan posted:Whew!
Just got back from the bar and too lazy to look back in the thread, but I hope you guys did a proper amount of bitching over McSpupidFace not taking the field goal early in the game!
That really wasn't the issue. The 4Q D was the issue. What kind of bar were you at?!
The Pack has to get by Minnesota next week first. The Vikings still have an outside-outside-outside shot, and they would love to knock us out. Minnesota won't play as badly against GB as they did today against the Colts.
What a game....
A Packer bar.
3 more on the board early could have changed the game.
antooo posted:CAPackFan95 posted:94-94-6
+2 in point differential.
Actually, it's DEAD FARKING EVEN.
Both teams have scored 3325 points in the series.
CAPackFan95 posted:antooo posted:CAPackFan95 posted:94-94-6
+2 in point differential.
Actually, it's DEAD FARKING EVEN.
Both teams have scored 3325 points in the series.
OMG that is amazing !
CAPackFan95 posted:antooo posted:CAPackFan95 posted:94-94-6
+2 in point differential.
Actually, it's DEAD FARKING EVEN.
Both teams have scored 3325 points in the series.
No. Pack was up 1 point going into this game. So they are +4 in the series now.
But GB scored more TODAY!!!! So that's kind of the tiebreaker.
"A Packers win Sunday would tie the series up. Amazingly, the Packers have outscored the Bears by a single point over the nearly century-long rivalry — 3,305 to 3,304. That’s how close it has been, even though the series has been defined by long streaks of dominance by both sides."
CoPackFan posted:"A Packers win Sunday would tie the series up. Amazingly, the Packers have outscored the Bears by a single point over the nearly century-long rivalry — 3,305 to 3,304. That’s how close it has been, even though the series has been defined by long streaks of dominance by both sides."
According to this, coming in to today, it stood at 3295 for GB and 3298 for Chicago.
Packdog posted:Goalline posted:PackFoo posted:Clearly we'll watch the tape and make corrections.
Start by whacking Compers.
Time for him to go, but Thompson has a bunch of crap on the defensive side of the ball. Don't care what the scheme is, how can there be zero pass rush from the front ... all game long ? Haha, Morgan, Daniels, and uh who else makes you think they might be a blue or red chip player ?? Clay used to be !!!!!! Is the scheme asking Rollins, Gunther, Randall, and Hyde to play off and miss tackles ?? ILB look like just guys. At some point , big and fast athletes make plays ....not many guys like that on this defense.
Whack them too.
Not sure about the Wikipedia source... My link was Yahoo and they also mentioned it on the broadcast today.
http://m.packers.com/news/arti...12-b3b3-ade01e808383
"This year’s 26-10 victory back on Oct. 20 pulled Green Bay within one game again, at 93-94-6 (including two postseason games). Even stranger statistically is that the all-time score between the two teams is one measly point off. The Packers have scored 3,305 points to the Bears’ 3,304."
Right now Lombardi and Halas are standing 5 feet apart from each other on the most perfect field of grass you've ever seen and not speaking to each other but desperately want to thank the other for a job well done. We care because they cared.
Football DB
http://www.footballdb.com/team...ers/teamvsteam?opp=6
I got Packers 3,305 to Bears 3,304
Now Packers 3,335 to Bears 3,331
Goalline posted:Packdog posted:Goalline posted:PackFoo posted:Clearly we'll watch the tape and make corrections.
Start by whacking Compers.
Time for him to go, but Thompson has a bunch of crap on the defensive side of the ball. Don't care what the scheme is, how can there be zero pass rush from the front ... all game long ? Haha, Morgan, Daniels, and uh who else makes you think they might be a blue or red chip player ?? Clay used to be !!!!!! Is the scheme asking Rollins, Gunther, Randall, and Hyde to play off and miss tackles ?? ILB look like just guys. At some point , big and fast athletes make plays ....not many guys like that on this defense.
Whack them too.
Let's remember the injuries. Randall, Rollins, Martinez, Ryan, Fackrell, etc., etc. These are young guys that we still don't know how good they will become. It usually take several years. Don't write them off yet. TT and MM know a hell of a lot more than any of us about the team. So, armchair experts we are not.
2,870 points came off Jay Cutler interceptions. 2,350 points came off Brett Favre interceptions.
Attached is a spreadsheet that details everything in the series, I'm using Wikipedia's data. If there is an inaccuracy, point out and I'll correct.
bvan posted:A Packer bar.
3 more on the board early could have changed the game.
Yes it would have....Like Bears not going for the tie at the end of the game.
Still can't believe Fox didn't go for it on 4th down & goal. Glad he didn't but what do they have to lose??
Boris posted:Football DB
http://www.footballdb.com/team...ers/teamvsteam?opp=6
I got Packers 3,305 to Bears 3,304
Now Packers 3,335 to Bears 3,331
Found the discrepancy.
Wiki had the game of 11/5/39 as Chicago 24-17. Seems it was actually 30-27 Chicago.
And that corrects the data now! @Boris and @CoPackFan were correct...
Jake Ryans helmet
Can we have the stats on what QB has won the most games period in Soldier Field? Wasn't it Brett Favre at one time? Shouldn't be long before Rodgers owns that. I know Favre has the most TD passes at Soldier Field.
Favre was 13-3 as a Packer @ Chicago, 0-2 as a viking
Rodgers is 8-2 as a Packer @ Chicago
Packy posted:Goalline posted:Packdog posted:Goalline posted:PackFoo posted:Clearly we'll watch the tape and make corrections.
Start by whacking Compers.
Time for him to go, but Thompson has a bunch of crap on the defensive side of the ball. Don't care what the scheme is, how can there be zero pass rush from the front ... all game long ? Haha, Morgan, Daniels, and uh who else makes you think they might be a blue or red chip player ?? Clay used to be !!!!!! Is the scheme asking Rollins, Gunther, Randall, and Hyde to play off and miss tackles ?? ILB look like just guys. At some point , big and fast athletes make plays ....not many guys like that on this defense.
Whack them too.
Let's remember the injuries. Randall, Rollins, Martinez, Ryan, Fackrell, etc., etc. These are young guys that we still don't know how good they will become. It usually take several years. Don't write them off yet. TT and MM know a hell of a lot more than any of us about the team. So, armchair experts we are not.
I was being facetious. OK, dumb.
CAPackFan95 posted:Favre was 13-3 as a Packer @ Chicago, 0-2 as a viking
Rodgers is 8-2 as a Packer @ Chicago
Actually he was 12-3 at Soldier field and 1-0 at Memorial stadium in Champaign Illinois as a Packer.
touche
Gsands posted:What if the Bears would have taken the 10 second run off?
Rodgers would have hit Cobb for a TD on the next play.
Hungry5 posted:Gsands posted:What if the Bears would have taken the 10 second run off?
Rodgers would have hit Cobb for a TD on the next play.
CAPackFan95 posted:Favre was 13-3 as a Packer @ Chicago, 0-2 as a viking
Rodgers is 8-2 as a Packer @ Chicago
I wonder if Rodgers will be 2-0 as a Viking?
