I'm looking forward to the half time adjustments.
This is a fine effort today at Lambeau.
Total yards: Bengals 192 Packers 78
About as ugly a first half as they've had in a while.
Pakrz posted:MichiganPacker2 posted:Who knew losing almost your entire offensive line would cause you to struggle on offense?
If rationalizing makes you feel better about this crap hole of a team makes you feel better, knock yourself out. There's far more wrong here than David Bak.
I’m sure there’s a Vikings forum you could go commiserate with. Troll.
That was a piss-poor effort! Trevor Davis did not help on returns.
Grave Digger posted:Lot to fix, score isn’t ridiculous though. Make some adjustments to help Murphy and McCray, get the ball out faster, get some running game going, etc. Plenty of time to take care of business.
Absolutely.
MichiganPacker2 posted:Dom's defense didn't look great, but they gave up 14 points despite being on the field for 18:37 of the first half.
You could also say that Dom's defense has held to Bengals to only two touchdowns in 2 1/2 games.
bigdoggyjude posted:MM has no creativity. Even when there is time in the pocket, no-one is open.
That is the perplexing part. We have a great QB who sits back there longer than any other QB in the league. We have extremely well paid receiving corps who some would say is near the best in the league - and nobody is open. That is a problem. You would think they would have fixed that by now.
NumberThree posted:Pakrz posted:NumberThree posted:WolfPack posted:Boo birds out already
That’s because it’s peope from Milwaukee. They are terrible.
That... or there's a ****ty ****ing product on the field and the people in the stands spent a lot of money to watch this steaming pile of mule ****.
Still not an excuse to boo in the first quarter. Never, ever, boo your team—ever.
Packers fans have more class than that. It’s an embarrassment and I’m tired of it—it’s alwas the pathetic Milwaukee “fan.”
Packer fans are just like any other fans..nothing special....just fans
Wow - so glad I missed the first half. Probably saved X4 from a lot of my ranting lol.
Good news is there's another half left. Bad news is Dom is still our DC and good OL and DL and LB aren't walking through the door. ****
Pakrz posted:MichiganPacker2 posted:Who knew losing almost your entire offensive line would cause you to struggle on offense?
If rationalizing makes you feel better about this crap hole of a team makes you feel better, knock yourself out. There's far more wrong here than David Bak.
David Bak is probably their 2nd or 3rd most important player. That's not all the problems, but it's a significant part of it. He's a Pro Bowl level LT.
The pick 6 is on Rodgers. The rest of the offensive struggles to run the ball and pass protect are because they went from the best OL in the league with Sitton and Lang to an adequate one if they have Bak, and a terrible one without him.
bigdoggyjude posted:Every team has multiple injuries...that's no excuse. Take what you have and scheme accordingly. Something MM seems incapable of doing.
You would be completely wrong. There is no team in the league with those type of injuries on the Oline who wouldn't be affected.
MichiganPacker2 posted:PackFoo posted:The inability if this staff to draft and develop OL depth is staggering.
They let Lang, Sitton, and Tretter go in the last 13 months. They had depth, they just decided to spend the money elsewhere. If Lane Taylor and Tretter are your 6th and 7th lineman, you are as good as anyone in the NFL.
Partially true.
Partially also true that TT has squirreled a lot more money than usual and consciously chose not to pay these guys.
Need some blocking and pass rush...that's all.
Well, C-Boy is kinda regretting wasting a day watching the Vikings lose with their backup Q...wait...watching the Crew salvage a spilt versus the Cu...wait...and a Pack victo...maybe...
At least the Dirty Birds lost...
Hey Bong- remember 2013 game at Lambeau. Pretty sure the Bengals O carved up this **** ass D and ironically had a defensive TD. Hmm kind of looks like this game.
MichiganPacker2 posted:Dom's defense didn't look great, but they gave up 14 points despite being on the field for 18:37 of the first half.
Are you watching a different game? They looked lost!
Henry posted:bigdoggyjude posted:Every team has multiple injuries...that's no excuse. Take what you have and scheme accordingly. Something MM seems incapable of doing.
You would be completely wrong. There is no team in the league with those type of injuries on the Oline who wouldn't be affected.
So what about the plays when Rodgers has time and we get the coverage sack? It's a lot deeper than a couple of typical O line being out.
Call in the dogs, and put out the fire, this game is over. This team has no guts and no heart. Pure and simple
bigdoggyjude posted:Henry posted:bigdoggyjude posted:Every team has multiple injuries...that's no excuse. Take what you have and scheme accordingly. Something MM seems incapable of doing.
You would be completely wrong. There is no team in the league with those type of injuries on the Oline who wouldn't be affected.
So what about the plays when Rodgers has time and we get the coverage sack? It's a lot deeper than a couple of typical O line being out.
You mean when they have to keep guys into chip and still watch the OL scrubs get beat? Yeah, that could affect your game plan.
Grave Digger posted:Pakrz posted:MichiganPacker2 posted:Who knew losing almost your entire offensive line would cause you to struggle on offense?
If rationalizing makes you feel better about this crap hole of a team makes you feel better, knock yourself out. There's far more wrong here than David Bak.
I’m sure there’s a Vikings forum you could go commiserate with. Troll.
There isn't a single thing I can think of where your opinion matters. I mean... just nothing. So go **** yourself.
What? Nobody studied any film on the Bengals? Man, what lousy planning and preperation. MM just runs his offence regardless of what team the Pack is playing. The whole league knows what the Pack is gonna do on offence.
YATittle posted:no rhythm on offense.
So dependent on rhythm when on offense.
Sounds stupid but aside from the 2 TD drives the defense did well considering the amount of time they've been out there.
bigdoggyjude posted:Henry posted:bigdoggyjude posted:Every team has multiple injuries...that's no excuse. Take what you have and scheme accordingly. Something MM seems incapable of doing.
You would be completely wrong. There is no team in the league with those type of injuries on the Oline who wouldn't be affected.
So what about the plays when Rodgers has time and we get the coverage sack? It's a lot deeper than a couple of typical O line being out.
I reluctantly agree. It seems open receivers have become a trend. Now I know we don't have Cobb and this Bengals secondary is really good...but it has been a trend. Also...teams have been shoving ruining backs down the Bengals throat and we can't do anything running the ball..so there is that.
bandit posted:Call in the dogs, and put out the fire, this game is over. This team has no guts and no heart. Pure and simple
Go watch HGTV.
Green Bay has to run the ball. They have to man up and run the ball. Run the ball. Dammit they have to run the ball against a two deep safety soft box. RTFB!!!