Home: Arizona, San Francisco, Buffalo, Miami, Atlanta, Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota.
Away: Los Angeles Rams, Seattle, New England, New York Jets, Washington, Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
The schedule is a little tougher than I thought it would be next year. The Rams, NE, and Seattle games on the road are going to be tough and I would be two of them are on Sunday night or MNF.
At least we finally get Atlanta in GB.
The Packers have had Russell Favre's number the last, what, now 4 games? The legion of doom isn't what it once was. And Earl Thomas is likely heading for FA. This isn't the 2013 Seahags anymore.
Away at NE and the Rams are tough. The rest? Looks like a schedule for a team that finished in 3rd.
Pakrz posted:At least we finally get Atlanta in GB.
Hoping that's a December game.
Packers @LA Rams I'm there! Unfortunately the new stadium isn"t ready yet. But tickets will be less. But Rams are successful so prices may go up. But Packers new D will be top 10. But I'm getting ahead of myself...
Going to see 49ers @ Rams this Sun. Suddenly looks like a competitive game.
: )
I don't see a loss
@NE. Iâll be there. Lots of Packers fans attend games in NE as well.
Hundley panicked when he saw the schedule and ran out of the pocket..
Then ducked, took the sack, and GB is already 0-1.
There's some speculation Pack @ Rams may be played in London.
There's always a lot of comparisons of the Packers and Patriots.
Playing the AFCE this year will be the best measuring stick.
Schedule looks much less daunting when you factor in the new and improved defense.
bigdoggyjude posted:@NE. Iâll be there. Lots of Packers fans attend games in NE as well.
I will be there too. I have a very good friend in the Boston area that can get tickets for me to go to the game.
GreenBayLA posted:Packers @LA Rams I'm there! Unfortunately the new stadium isn"t ready yet. But tickets will be less. But Rams are successful so prices may go up. But Packers new D will be top 10. But I'm getting ahead of myself...
Going to see 49ers @ Rams this Sun. Suddenly looks like a competitive game.
: )
I will be @LA too with my brother from Wisconsin hopefully....
Let's just hope the NFL doesn't stick it to the Packers and make them play Rams and the Pats back to back.
Play the hand you're dealt.
DurangoDoug posted:There's some speculation Pack @ Rams may be played in London.
This would be awesome for me....ðŽð
No London for us in 2018
Blair Kiel posted:Hundley panicked when he saw the schedule and ran out of the pocket..
What? Hundley does not run out of the pocket, he runs straight backwards (usually for no reason). He's the only "quarterback" I can remember who runs 15 yards backwards when facing zone coverage and a 3-man "blitz."
That's not entirely fair though, because he has no idea what zone defense is or how to read it (either in real-time before the snap, or after the play develops, or 2 weeks after the play is over when reviewing the film).
Brainwashed Boris posted:No London for us in 2018
I don't want to play in London.
I don't want to lose the home game.
We're injury-prone enough without jet-leg being added to the list.
Sooner or later it's going to happen.
I'm looking forward to seeing Pack fans and hearing >>-GO-PACK-GO!-> with an accent!
Like Lambeau full of UP'rs?
Hungry5 posted:Like Lambeau full of UP'rs?
The Packers aren't going to lose a home game. The problem for the NFL is the opposing teams don't want to lose their home game against the Packers, they would lose too much money.
Roger Goodell has faced some backlash over various things he's done in the past such as his handling of the Ray Rice suspension, etc. Whatever backlash he's received in the past, you can multiply that backlash times 100 if you take away a Packers' home game and ship it to London. He'd probably have to go into seclusion for years before the animosity would simmer down.
It will be an away game.
Probably against the Chargers too.
NumberThree posted:Blair Kiel posted:Hundley panicked when he saw the schedule and ran out of the pocket..
What? Hundley does not run out of the pocket, he runs straight backwards (usually for no reason). He's the only "quarterback" I can remember who runs 15 yards backwards when facing zone coverage and a 3-man "blitz."
That's not entirely fair though, because he has no idea what zone defense is or how to read it (either in real-time before the snap, or after the play develops, or 2 weeks after the play is over when reviewing the film).
You're not terribly fond of your quarterback room, are you?
NumberThree posted:Brainwashed Boris posted:No London for us in 2018
I don't want to play in London.
I don't want to lose the home game.
We're injury-prone enough without jet-leg being added to the list.
I want to see a Packers game at the new Tottenham Hotspur stadium, dammit!
