Skip to main content

Boris posted:

Jordy was the Raiders leading receiver last year.

Jordy as a #4 or #5? For $1.5-$2 Million? I could see it in Green Bay if he is agreeable. 

But there is a lot of young receivers in Green Bay now. He might not be able to beat them out.

IIRC James Jones was the leading receiver for the Raiders in 2014 when they cut him and the Pack reacquired him (from the Giants) before the start of the 2015 season.  JJ had a nice 50 catch season in 2015 before retiring.

Put me in the tire-kicking camp.

vitaflo posted:
Chongo posted:

"Motivated by prove-it deal"??  Dix had a prove-it deal with two teams last year and failed them both.  What makes anyone think he's going to try this year?

Besides, when is the last time anyone saw HHCD hit a guy like Amos does? Da Bears took a step backwards by signing HHCD to replace Amos. I'd bet they draft a Safety who will probably start and get more playing time than HHCD. HHCD is just more depth for Da Bears.

pkr_north posted:

apparantly hasn't watched much of hhcd lately.  ole.  

Pretty sure your right. I think you really have to weigh a lot of what these media guys say very carefully. I'm guessing very few have done any real scouting and just go with the flow, regurgitating the hype. HHCD came into the league with plenty of hype complete with the Bama notoriety. He's still riding that hype and collecting on it. He's got a couple of big plays to his resume so far and that's all these guys remember.

mrtundra posted:

Besides, when is the last time anyone saw HHCD hit a guy like Amos does? Da Bears took a step backwards by signing HHCD to replace Amos. I'd bet they draft a Safety who will probably start and get more playing time than HHCD. HHCD is just more depth for Da Bears.

Not a bad guess, insurance policy while they draft a safety.  Wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't see the field much or even make it out of camp.

Ok, so I can't find anymore than it is a one year contract for $3.5m.  I wonder how much of a bonus/guaranteed money is involved.  I found reports that he passed up more money to stay with the Redskins, which is kind of bizarre.  

Just watched some highlight film of him and it confirmed what everyone here is saying.  Most of his interceptions have been on overthrown, tipped or balls that should never had been thrown.  When they showed him hitting someone, I had to check my eyes to see if it really was him.

The reaction to the Clinton-Dix signing is classic national media stupidity.  First rounder + one year deal = great signing.  None of these guys have any clue about his play the last 2 season, they just revert back to the fact they know his name and he was a first rounder. 

First half of last season was a prove it deal with the Packers and he was traded.  He proved he wasn't worth a deal.  Second half was a prove it deal with Washington.  Again he proved he wasn't worth a deal.  So third time is a charm? 

Can't wait to play him twice next year.   

michiganjoe posted:

Amos has three picks in four years and it's entirely possible HHCD will give the Bears more big plays. The problem is between the big plays he's horribly inconsistent and doesn't exactly seek out contact. 

And Amos is very consistent and versatile. He didn’t get a contract because of INT stats.  He got it for being a reliable cover safety 

yes Henry, and to add to that, he will be in the right spot at the right time - and he can communicate the coverage and where the do-does should be.  that was a big issue with the geen-e-ouss types we have had.  always a breakdown in communications, get it figured out mate.  just give me a bunch of do your job guys, and we will be set.

PA green & gold posted:

Today on Philly sports talk they’re talking about how the Eagles should sign Clay Matthews. “He’s a stud” and would put them over the top. I don’t think any of them have watched Clay play the last 2 years. 

Si listed the top 50 FA still available and Clay was not even listed. 

And according to SI Amos was the 4th best FA signing.

4. Adrian Amos, S, Packers – 4 years, $12M guaranteed

Amos played in a predominantly 2-deep safety scheme under defensive coordinator Vic Fangio in Chicago and now must transition to a predominantly 1-deep scheme under Packers coordinator Mike Pettine. But that’ll be a small challenge, and Amos was always sound when the Bears did employ 1-deep coverages. More importantly, Fangio’s and Pettine’s schemes are predicated on matchup zone principles. Amos has the vision and spatial awareness to solidify Green Bay’s matchup zones, which wobbled too often last year as young players shuffled from position to position, due to injuries and lineup-tinkering. Another way to view this: Instead of re-signing Ha-Ha Clinton-Dix, one of football’s most physically gifted but least reliable safeties, the Packers filled that spot with a quality starter from their rival Bears. (And later saw those Bears sign Clinton-Dix, no less.)

heyward posted:

That's my point. Gutey wasted money on Graham last season and now he's doubling down on that mistake.

What? How is drafting a potential stud TE doubling down on a FA bust? Which hasn't happened yet, I should add.

No, doubling down on a mistake was signing Graham a year after the Martellus Bennett fiasco. 

If anything, Gutey seems to be more than willing to send mistakes packing. 

See Dix
See Dumbarius
See Ty
See Perry
See McCarthy
See  the rest of the coaching staff sans Pettine

I'd prefer to see them move on from Graham but apparently he's getting one more shot. Would you prefer they put all their eggs in that broken down basket or move on to plan B for what is supposedly a pretty important piece in this new offense that's being installed? 

Ah, gotcha. Yeah, I figured he was gone. Not sure what the cap hit for cutting him was vs. keeping him this year but I though the deal was set up in a way that they could walk away from the contract after 1 year and not get beat up too much.

I really don't expect him to be worth whatever they pay him this year but maybe the new scheme will work. I'm not counting on it. I'm more optimistic about getting some value out of Lewis. 

The biggest play of the year (IMO) Rodgers throws a perfect strike to Graham in the endzone vs. the Bears. The ball bounced off Graham's facemask & turned a TD into Rodgers first INT breaking the 300+ pass .streak without an INT.

That play was a microcosm of the entire Packers season wrapped up in a nice bow for everyone. 

I still think Graham can be a red zone threat. I have also heard he's pretty good in the locker room. LR is probably the biggest reason they kept Graham around. 

Pakrz posted:

Graham's best years are behind him.  Graham himself stated his numbers weren't where they needed to be last year.  That said, in a year where GB was abnormally bad, Graham was the 9th ranked TE in the NFL with 55 catches for 636 yards.  A top 10 TE... we could be doing much worse.

Exactly.  I don't expect him to break out huge next year but to say he can't be a solid contributor in an offense that isn't completely dysfunctional isn't much of a stretch.  Still overpaid?  Maybe but I'll give it a year under someone who isn't McVince.

It's often said that FA is the price you pay for poor drafts.  There is little doubt that rings true. With the upcoming draft, Gute has the opportunity to fill some significant holes not only for now, but the future. At 12, Gute may very well choose to take a DT knowing that Daniels is a FA (And 30 years old) next off season.  Hell, he may take OL there knowing you can't push Bulaga much further down the road.  Lots of things to think about....

What I like about the signings is they are all young guys with clean bills of health. 

All investments are risky, but Gute went with the percentages --the actuarial data with a greater chance of success.  Good call.

Look at Turner: People say, "Well he's mediocre."  The thing is, they know he can play.  They know he can start and not be a liability.  That's more than we can say about some of the current linemen on this roster. 

And it can't be said at all about draft picks.  I mean, who thought Spriggs would suck?  His resume and measurables looked like he would develop into an NFL starter.  

These FA's are young guys you know can play.  Yes they cost money but yes we needed them. 

And they look happy as clams to be in GB, which is kind of a nice bonus.  Welcome to Titletown let's get another one hey.

The bad thing about losing Breeland is losing the leadership, but I actually think we're heading in the right direction at CB. Lots of IFs, but IF guys stay healthy and build on what they did this past year I think there's a lot to like. I wasn't impressed with Jackson, but his college resume is impressive and he's a guy (like Casey Hayward) that you give time for development. He's a guy I could see breaking out in year 2 after getting time year 1 to adjust to the NFL (some guys adjust more easily than others). Brown did some good things year 1 to build on, I'm not ready to label him as anything yet, but he's another one that could break out in year 2. Alexander obviously did a lot of positive things to build on, he's trending toward elite CB status IMO. This is a young group that needs some veteran leadership in the room. Tramon is good, but I think a vocal Charles Woodson-esque leader could be the difference in these guys developing into JAGs or stars. 

Again, with OLB locked down I'd like to see an early pick at CB. Another Alexander back there could be a difference maker at CB in the short term and long term. 

Last edited by Grave Digger

Ketchman had an interesting point on his blog this morning.  He is pretty confident that Gute must have determined on his board that an elite edge guy would not be there at 12 which resulted in his signing 2 OLB FA's.  He also thinks Gute will go heavy O in April.

Bad Bob doesn't like Z'D, calls him Perry 2.0 and GB overpaid for him.  He does really like Preston though.

DH13 posted:

Ketchman had an interesting point on his blog this morning.  He is pretty confident that Gute must have determined on his board that an elite edge guy would not be there at 12 which resulted in his signing 2 OLB FA's.  He also thinks Gute will go heavy O in April.

Bad Bob doesn't like Z'D, calls him Perry 2.0 and GB overpaid for him.  He does really like Preston though.

Quite possible we did overpay but I highly doubt he's as useless as Perry has been. I will be shocked if a TE isn't picked in the first two rounds.

michiganjoe posted:
michiganjoe posted:

https://giantswire.usatoday.co...missed-tackles-2018/

 

Slobknocker posted:

Packers make error in cap space

If true no more FA I would think

DWIGHT SCHRUTE EVERYBODY!

How much more in-f'in-ept does Murphy have to be before he is shit canned?  Really killing it there ol' Murph.  Good thing you kept Vice President of Jockstrap Acquisition and Implementation on staff!

Pretty much done with FA.  Didn't need Breeland anyways.  Who needs solid depth and rotation with Clay?    

Last edited by Henry

I don't know that I'd go off yet, Henry.
It makes little sense to me; the Packers have managed the salary cap very well since it began and it's hard to imagine a $20M-$30M "miscalculation".
Also, who 'discovered' this? Was the team notified by the league, or was it strictly in-house? Unless a "source" has paperwork related to either, it's dubious.

If it turns out to have any truth, I'll hold Murphy for you while you drop-kick him right square in the nuts.

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×