I also think it is great everyone forgets Edleman might have been so good in the Superbowl because he got to rest for the first four games of the season
El-Ka-Bong posted:I also think it is great everyone forgets Edleman might have been so good in the Superbowl because he got to rest for the first four games of the season
After missing a season for knee surgery.
Zero chance Bo Jackson can play an effective Barry Sanders role. They are two completely different body types.
This idea you have to be 5’11 and shifty to be a great slot reciever is bullshit. Can you recognize coverage and quickly find the vacated spot? Can you play football?
If Tyler Boyd at 6’2 can become a ****ing nightmare in the slot with Andy Dalton then EQ has a great opportunity with Rodgers and MLF.
And never, ever, ever assume we understand what EQ, Valdez Scantling, Moore, Kumerow, and Davis are capable of after watching them in Mikes offense.
Does that mean they misused Jeff Janis! too? 
Janis is a tough sell. Rams offense was never the same after losing 6’2 210 lb slot reciever Cooper Kupp.
Football is always evolving. Cant fill spots looking for “body types”. Find football players. Then coach them up. Goes for every position.
I think Cobb, if on the team, is a more likely Edelman clone.
Good route runner, great hands, probably sees field/coverage well as a former QB.
Interesting last few minutes of the packers podcast from Silverstein and robin that came out this am.
He addresses bakhtiari’s comments about lack of accountability and goes at rodgers a lil bit. Worth a listen.
Silverstein predicted the Rams straight up and against the spread to beat NE. He’s trying to matter.
Look at the coaches. Then look at the QBs. The Pats were always the bet.
Pikes Peak posted:El-Ka-Bong posted:I also think it is great everyone forgets Edleman might have been so good in the Superbowl because he got to rest for the first four games of the season
After missing a season for knee surgery.
And juicing up on the cream and the clear. And I believe he is still juicing. Look at the definition and quickness and NEs propensity to cheat.
Didn't know where else to put this.
#ComeOnCity !!!! Time to open the flood gates!!!! @ManCity
— Bryan Bulaga (@BBulaga) February 27, 2019
Guess Bulaga likes @ManCity
Confirmed start with a division win in the windy city.
The Chicago Bears will play host to the Packers on Thursday, Sept. 5 at 7:20 p.m. CT, at Soldier Field. The opener will be televised on NBC. This past year, Green Bay opened its own 100th season at Lambeau Field with a 24-23 comeback win over the Bears.
That should be a fun game. great atmosphere. Looking very forward to seeing this LaFleur offense and Pettine defense, complete with new toys in the toy chest.
This is great news! 1) This guarantees we won't have a short week Thursday game during the season and 2) we will start the season with a mini-bye. The only things more fun than embarrassing Chicago in week 1 is embarrassing them in week 17 to keep them from the playoffs and embarrassing them on their own turf to keep them from the SB!
Brewers play the Scubs the same day.
Sweep the FIBs.
Isn't the week 1 TNF game technically a SNF game in terms of who gets scheduled on Thursdays? Meaning you get another Thursday game?
Last year's opener was Atlanta at Philadelphia. Atlanta played again on Thanksgiving at New Orleans, while Philadelphia played Thursday, Oct. 11 at NYG.
Dammit that sucks! Least we get a couple extra days before the next opponent though.
Week 1 NFL: Packers @ Bears
— FanDuel Sportsbook (@FDSportsbook) March 25, 2019
Spread: Bears -4
ML: Bears -194
🏈➡️ https://t.co/3weKyinVpJ https://t.co/Vfdlpy87ou