Cobb supposedly hobbled, game time decision. I say if he can't produce (see Chicago game) then get Allison out there....
Cobb not playing does not effect GB's game with Allison playing well. We probably miss Cobb in the PR role. I see Marvin Jones having another 200 yard game against our D-backs. Perhaps Packers are expecting to win by mailing it in without enough effort. Packers lose in a heartbreaker and chaos breaks out in Packerland.
Or not.
Just tweeted the sports director at NBC 15 Madison, WI. And he informed me that we get the broadcast. οΏ½οΏ½
Just curious- if anyone is blacked out from watching on air - try watching online via NBC sports online? Could be an option.
I will be watching with TV muted but listening to Wayne and Larry - just like Grandpa did with Jim & Max - I've been doing it since the start of the streak - no way in hell am I screwing it up now.
PackerPatrick posted:I see Marvin Jones having another 200 yard game against our D-backs.
His production has fallen off a cliff and that performance is an anomaly. Key to the game remains making Stafford uncomfortable and rushing his decisions. I've got him down for two picks and AR for three touchdown passes in a game not all that close.
michiganjoe posted:PackerPatrick posted:I see Marvin Jones having another 200 yard game against our D-backs.
His production has fallen off a cliff and that performance is an anomaly. Key to the game remains making Stafford uncomfortable and rushing his decisions. I've got him down for two picks and AR for three touchdown passes in a game not all that close.
Doesn't matter that his production has fallen off. I did not explain why I expected that. The way I see it is that there is often a receiver that burns us big time and often not the prime guy. I am not sure why that is but my guess is that with our youngsters in the defensive back end we concentrate on the main guys and take our lumps with others as a calculated risk. Stafford no longer relies so much on one guy to throw to anymore. Tate, Ebron and Bolton will get their balls but that leaves Jones to the least GB DB to cover. QB's know Capers coverage leans to the premier receivers. We really have no choice in coverage.
Edit: (Jones is reported to have over 850 yards this season.)
Would that be Michael Bolton?
DH13 posted:Would that be Michael Bolton?
Hope so. Would help after the National Anthem is over
Damn spell check.
Stat Chick on NFL Network gives Packers 51% chance to win. I am OK with that.
Why is the Packers logo on a Brazilian flag?