Hey Excalibur, My point is that you don't panic and reach and burn mortgage draft capital unless you're absolutely sure you have the next Mahomes or Rodgers. You can find good QBs in lower rounds. 

Just for fun, I looked up the 2019 QB starters not drafted in R1 and their draft number: Carolina: Kyle Allen (UDFA), Will Grier (100); Bengals: Dalton (35); Cowboys: Prescott (135); Denver: Drew Lock (42); Detroit: Blough (UDFA); Indy: Brissett (91); Jacksonville: Minshew (178); Miami: Fitzpatrick (250); Minnesota: Cousins (102); Patriots: Brady (199); Raiders: Carr (36); Pittsburgh: Rudolph (76); SF: Garropolo (62); Seattle: Wilson (75); Washington: Keenum (UDFA). Worthy mentions: Brees was #32, as was his replacement this year, Bridgewater.

No, not all of them are HOFers, but a) it's hard to find the next Rodgers, Brady or Brees in any round, and b) some of them were tossed into situations that didn't help their development. 

I think when GB drafted Hundley they saw him with some potential, and we all know how that worked out. I'm not sure if they saw potential in Boyle or just wanted a decent camp body. I'm thinking that this year Gutey will keep a closer watch for QBs. 

Just for fun, part 2: Of the starters in 2019 who were drafted in R1, only a few were worthy of the position: Mahomes, Jackson, Rodgers, Rivers, Ryan. (I'd put Stafford here if he had played more this year.) Some should have definitely gone in lower rounds: Mayfield, Goff, Tannehill, Watson (I just can't get behind him). Some are "jury's still out": Murray, J. Allen, Darnold, Jones, Haskins. At least two are close to bust: Winston, Trubisky. And I'm not sure where to put Wentz...

El-Nuke-the-Hurricanes-Bong posted:

Does anyone seriously see Hebert as a first round pick?  

I am not quite sure what people see in him that makes them think he is a sure thing high in the draft.  A decent college QB to me and I kind of think of Trubisky when I see him play.

I am ok with the thought of drafting ARs eventual replacement I just don't see a guy in this draft that the Packers could get that you could say damn that is the guy.  Burrow, Tua, and Herbert will be gone by the time the Packers pick so who is left to go late in the first?  Fromm ehh no.

I say go play makers early and often and you will see a fully rejuvenated #12 if he has real options.

SATORI, you may be right, but that's not how I remember it.  Wolf went for need, wanting to replace Reggie White, so he reached for Holliday.  Wolf often did that.  He did t when he reached for Bubba Franks in reaction to the hot-tub incident with Chmura.  He did it when he reached for DB Antuan Edwards in reaction to Vikings drafting Moss the year before.  Truth be told, Wolf most often went for need and had a horrible record in the first round.  What distinguished him was signing Reggie White, trading for Brett Favre and finding some gems in mid-to-late rounds.  But if he had not reached so often in the first round, he likely would have surrounded Favre with just enough better talent for Favre to have won a few Super Bowls instead of just one.  

Last edited by sschumer - Packer Fan HoF'r
sschumer - Packer Fan HoF'r posted:

SATORI, you may be right....

of course I'm right, I took it straight from Wolf

1998, DE Vonnie Holliday (19th overall selection): Wolf traded up 10 spots, hoping to land safety Shaun Williams, but was delighted to find Holliday still on the board. Holliday has been a solid starter the last five years, but the unrestricted free agent recently signed with Kansas City.

"Really and truly, we made the deal to get Shaun Williams," Wolf said. "We figured Holliday would be gone. But fortunately, Vonnie was there. And that pick was easy."

Henry posted:
Hungry5 posted:

I guess everyone is discounting Boyle's potential. 

Pretty much.  I definitely think competition is never bad (obviously).  Maybe he's the Kurt Warner who wasn't mercilessly teased by Bert and bagging groceries. 

To be honest, there definitely is some similarities in the style of play.  Kurt Boyle.

In his college career playing in low level D1, Boyle threw 12 TDs and 26 interceptions. 

http://stats.washingtonpost.co...layers.asp?id=227501

When Warner got the chance to play in college,  he was his conference's offensive player of the year. It was still obscure, but at least he showed he could perform in an actual games. 

He had to sit his first three years at Northern Iowa, patiently waiting for his chance. It finally arrived during his senior year, and the former third-stringer responded with a season that earned him Gateway Conference Offensive Player of the Year honors.

El-Nuke-the-Hurricanes-Bong posted:

Well, yeah

I mean, I watched him play one game and never thought, this guy belongs in the nfl

There's so many examples of 1st round guys that suck and later round guys that pan out.  Russell and Leaf.... Wilson and Brady.  Then you have guys like Tannehill that sucked until he didn't.  Who the hell knows.  I just know you need to draft one every now and again and hope you hit on a guy.  In a perfect world, we get a young gun that can learn behind AR for a few years.  Maybe that guy is Herbert or Fromm or some other dude... I haven't a clue.  

I'm not sure I'd even like to draft a QB in R1 unless another Rodgers falls to Gutey's lap. Everyone expects sooooo much so soon, and so few deliver. If the value is there later, sure you draft a QB. And if he's going to be your starter one day, you now have time to groom him for the position. 

Unfortunately today, it's all about "play now" for those R1 QBs because everyone sees them as a savior and so few can actually do it. If Mayfield, Watson, J. Allen, et al., had a full year or two of just learning, they would probably be a whole lot better for it. I doubt that even Rodgers could have carried the whole weight of a franchise as a starting QB his rookie year and been successful. 

So, if you find "your guy" in later rounds, go for it. You lock him in for five years, sit him for a minimum of one year, find out if he's really The Man.

Pakrz posted:  

In a perfect world, we get a young gun that can learn behind AR for a few years.  Maybe that guy is Herbert or Fromm or some other dude... I haven't a clue.  

Or Boyle, or Wilkins...