Curious why the half wit coward ducks Happy Wanderer's (level 5) questions?
Add Reaction
ðŊâĪïļððððĪððđððâïļððŧððŋðĒðĪŠðĪĢâ
ððĪ·ðĨðððĪŊOriginal Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I duck no questions. He tried to bring up an old thread as some sort of ammo and I proved him wrong. What more do you want.
-
Packers play the Eagles on the road this year. Now they will probably lose against Favre and Kolb.
-
Packers play the Eagles on the road this year. Now they will probably lose against Favre and Kolb.
When do they lose to Nall?
When they cut him.
The only thing Tiger could do to shock me is sleep with a black woman
qb position is all politics. Mostly old retreads and high picks given a lot of rope to hang themself.
Bills had Losman, who did ok but tthen realized was never going to be that great. Then had Edwards who they drafted high and gave a ton of playing time because of where he was drafted and now he already fell out of favor.
O'Sullivan and Hill were given starting nods even though lesser players than Nall and quickly fizzled.
So I am content with Nall retiring with a great qb rating 5tds 0ints. Statistically Favres best backup. Theres no reason he shou ldnt be at least a backup in the league. I'm sure if I went through the rosters I would rather have him than 80% of the teams #2 qbs.
Bills had Losman, who did ok but tthen realized was never going to be that great. Then had Edwards who they drafted high and gave a ton of playing time because of where he was drafted and now he already fell out of favor.
O'Sullivan and Hill were given starting nods even though lesser players than Nall and quickly fizzled.
So I am content with Nall retiring with a great qb rating 5tds 0ints. Statistically Favres best backup. Theres no reason he shou ldnt be at least a backup in the league. I'm sure if I went through the rosters I would rather have him than 80% of the teams #2 qbs.
quote:Originally posted by the-icon:
I duck no questions.
why the act on this board?
You are paranoid.
-
More draft thoughts. I'm going to guess the pick will be Graham or Hughs. Or will get cute and reach on a Tackle.
-
More draft thoughts. I'm going to guess the pick will be Graham or Hughs. Or will get cute and reach on a Tackle.
quote:You are paranoid.
since you duck no questions, the sole purpose for your act on this board to to address my paranoia?
I'll have to consult to voices on this one
I'll have to consult to voices on this one
quote:Originally posted by the-icon:
So I am content with Nall retiring with a great qb rating 5tds 0ints. Statistically Favres best backup. Theres no reason he shou ldnt be at least a backup in the league. I'm sure if I went through the rosters I would rather have him than 80% of the teams #2 qbs.
There goes ikkkon showing us that reality again. I guess you forgot
I came for the free waffles.
quote:Statistically Favres best backup
Really?
So Nall was better than Mark Brunell and Matt Hasselbeck?
Pass the bong
Understand the quote. While backing up Favre.
So why do people think Gomez is ging to be a good obp guy. Wishful thinking? Miss Cleo told you?
So why do people think Gomez is ging to be a good obp guy. Wishful thinking? Miss Cleo told you?
123 QB rating. The best of all time.
quote:Originally posted by the-icon:
The only thing Tiger could do to shock me is sleep with a black woman
Keep on rockin', Mark.
quote:Understand the quote. While backing up Favre.
stats say different.
--
Thought of the day. In Favres Packer career had 15 non losing seasons. Without him it would have been lucky to be even half that.
The stupid thing about the hate on him, is those who are the loudest about hating him, for reasons invented in their heads, will be the first to proclaim that they forgive him, as if anyone cares about their opinion or their bogus belief system that fuels their ignorance. Thus is the life of the happy wanderer.
--
Thought of the day. In Favres Packer career had 15 non losing seasons. Without him it would have been lucky to be even half that.
The stupid thing about the hate on him, is those who are the loudest about hating him, for reasons invented in their heads, will be the first to proclaim that they forgive him, as if anyone cares about their opinion or their bogus belief system that fuels their ignorance. Thus is the life of the happy wanderer.
this guy a complete idiot?
Yes, sounds like it. Even with Rodgers having his career year Favre still had a better season and led his team to more wins.
Better season? 
Still in denial as usual. Next, I'm sure you'll be telling us how Ferguson was better than Jerry Rice and Tony Gwynn Jr was better than his dad.
quote:Originally posted by the-icon:
Yes, sounds like it.
thanks for clearing that up. I suspected that, but your affirmation removes all doubt.
Tommorow I might study some film to see if I can uncover a Kolb in this draft.
-
Brewres arent inspiring at the moment. Wolf looks like the only competent pitcher. Yo needs to turn it around.
-
Brewres arent inspiring at the moment. Wolf looks like the only competent pitcher. Yo needs to turn it around.
Back at 'er?
After some research, the qb I am throwing my support behind for the mid rounds is..............
Florida Atlantic QB Rusty Smith. Ideal size, decent arm, under the radar from being in a smaller conference, under the radar because he missed time because of injury on his non-throwing shoulder. Top attitude and leadership. Would be a good guy for MM to develop.
Florida Atlantic QB Rusty Smith. Ideal size, decent arm, under the radar from being in a smaller conference, under the radar because he missed time because of injury on his non-throwing shoulder. Top attitude and leadership. Would be a good guy for MM to develop.
Poor Rusty. The guy has no chance now.
Go play a rusty trombone. I'll show you how to roll those balls in your mouth.
My mid-round guy is
John Skelton, Fordham, 6-5, 244.
Best arm at the Senior Bowl. Might turn out to be another Ingle Martin but I think he has a shot in the pros
John Skelton, Fordham, 6-5, 244.
Best arm at the Senior Bowl. Might turn out to be another Ingle Martin but I think he has a shot in the pros
Film study on potential olb
-----------------------------
The guy that stands out the most to me is Graham by far.
imo Griffen is more suited as a 4-3 end. And it concerns me somewhat all his rushing I saw was from the right side, but they need a lolb.
Kindle I am a bit torn on. Kind of overrated and seems unintelligent.
Hughs seems kind of like Kindle to me but with a better head on his shoulders. Dosen't seem anywhere near as physical as Graham to me.
-----------------------------
The guy that stands out the most to me is Graham by far.
imo Griffen is more suited as a 4-3 end. And it concerns me somewhat all his rushing I saw was from the right side, but they need a lolb.
Kindle I am a bit torn on. Kind of overrated and seems unintelligent.
Hughs seems kind of like Kindle to me but with a better head on his shoulders. Dosen't seem anywhere near as physical as Graham to me.
You know things are bad with the Brewers when people are clamoring for Dale Sveum. Thats embarrassing. Yes Macha is average at best but the blame is with Melvin. I called for Melvin's firing 2 years ago.
They wait way too long to fire Yost so Melvin can save his ass. Then for whatever reason is in love with Macha even after he jilted him once.
Shaky manager, shaky GM, overrated farm system, inability to advance starting pitchers. And thats where things are at.
They wait way too long to fire Yost so Melvin can save his ass. Then for whatever reason is in love with Macha even after he jilted him once.
Shaky manager, shaky GM, overrated farm system, inability to advance starting pitchers. And thats where things are at.
I think this guy is reading my thread http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/d...ive;coverlist_footer
Who doesn't?
Current Wisconsin sports beefs on uniforms/logos
- Brewers logo. How hard would it be to simply use the ball and glove logo with the new color system. Why is that such a hard solution for these pinheads to realize. Its one of the greatest logos in sports and the one associated with hall of famers like Molitor and Yount.
Instead they want to call it "retro" so they have a second set of merchandise to shill on people.
Is there that much affinity to a hand written M with barley under it. This would be like if the Packers witched their logo to a differnt G with a sausage casing under it after they rename Lambeau field, Johnsonville Stadium.
- The Bucks uniforms. They got the red and green part right but the font style is awful and they kept the same logo from the purple and green ones but just put a triangle behind it. They had an opportunity to wipe the slate clean and go with a look more like the oscar robertson era ones and are now locked into these ones at least a handful more years.
- The Golden Eagles. Because the limp wristed politicaly correct morons want to throw all of the teams history in the toilet out of fear of offending someone. I could see redskins being slightly distastefull, but Warriors? Really? Being called a warrior is offensive? All the problems in the world, disease, hunger, wars, and people have time to be offended being called a warrior.
The admins then conduct a poll where 92% of the students wanted the Warriors nickname, but they ignored those results and randomly decide to make the nickname "Gold". The students and fans react harshley to that so the admins now say they will have another poll. Only this time they won't even have an option to vote for Warriors which won with 92% the last time
In the end after all that embarrassment they decide to just leave it as Golden Eagles when its clearly not what people want. Wouldn't a really simple compromise just be to leave it as Warriors but change the logo to a white guy with a sword. Ridiculous.
- Brewers logo. How hard would it be to simply use the ball and glove logo with the new color system. Why is that such a hard solution for these pinheads to realize. Its one of the greatest logos in sports and the one associated with hall of famers like Molitor and Yount.
Instead they want to call it "retro" so they have a second set of merchandise to shill on people.
Is there that much affinity to a hand written M with barley under it. This would be like if the Packers witched their logo to a differnt G with a sausage casing under it after they rename Lambeau field, Johnsonville Stadium.
- The Bucks uniforms. They got the red and green part right but the font style is awful and they kept the same logo from the purple and green ones but just put a triangle behind it. They had an opportunity to wipe the slate clean and go with a look more like the oscar robertson era ones and are now locked into these ones at least a handful more years.
- The Golden Eagles. Because the limp wristed politicaly correct morons want to throw all of the teams history in the toilet out of fear of offending someone. I could see redskins being slightly distastefull, but Warriors? Really? Being called a warrior is offensive? All the problems in the world, disease, hunger, wars, and people have time to be offended being called a warrior.
The admins then conduct a poll where 92% of the students wanted the Warriors nickname, but they ignored those results and randomly decide to make the nickname "Gold". The students and fans react harshley to that so the admins now say they will have another poll. Only this time they won't even have an option to vote for Warriors which won with 92% the last time
In the end after all that embarrassment they decide to just leave it as Golden Eagles when its clearly not what people want. Wouldn't a really simple compromise just be to leave it as Warriors but change the logo to a white guy with a sword. Ridiculous.
Rock Hudson and Tom Cruise each had wives
Your the only person I know with two college degrees, barber and clown.
I watch porn in between picks
Do you wear tall boots when you "groom" your clients?
Mark is very efficient. He kills three birds with one stone:
1. Watches draft. Immediately predicts either greatness or failure for every player picked. Is 100% wrong every time.
2. Scrubs dogs' asses. Hey, you can't suck off the public teet choking that teacher contract dry forever.
3. Networks, dates, looks for that spark that hasn't arrived yet.
1. Watches draft. Immediately predicts either greatness or failure for every player picked. Is 100% wrong every time.
2. Scrubs dogs' asses. Hey, you can't suck off the public teet choking that teacher contract dry forever.
3. Networks, dates, looks for that spark that hasn't arrived yet.
Draft predictions
1. What the hell, so and so was still on the board
2. Who?
3. The proverbial "hard working" "blue collar" "lunch pail" whitie
4. Classic boom or bust
5. Another receiver?
6. This guys not even in my draft guide
7. Is this over yet
1. What the hell, so and so was still on the board
2. Who?
3. The proverbial "hard working" "blue collar" "lunch pail" whitie
4. Classic boom or bust
5. Another receiver?
6. This guys not even in my draft guide
7. Is this over yet