Skip to main content

Hungry5 posted:

Screenshot_20181214-084717_Twitter

The answer to this riddle lies within the question.

Also, you could answer McStubborn-we-do-what-we-do

But those throws were there every week and Rodgers didn't take them. At some point the timing throws don't work, teams will start jumping those routes, but the short quick throws have been there every week. Rodgers has been just as McStubborn as McStupid was. 

Grave Digger posted:
Hungry5 posted:

Screenshot_20181214-084717_Twitter

The answer to this riddle lies within the question.

Also, you could answer McStubborn-we-do-what-we-do

But those throws were there every week and Rodgers didn't take them. At some point the timing throws don't work, teams will start jumping those routes, but the short quick throws have been there every week. Rodgers has been just as McStubborn as McStupid was. 

Play that won the game in week 1 was a broken redirect that Cobb initiated for 75 yards. It was vintage sand lot. And everyone loved sand lot at that particular moment.

And don't even get me started on the mother ****ing deep ball to Allison to start the 4th over perfect coverage by Fuller for 7. Perfect because it was a deep ball with 2 yards to go for a 1st down by the way. 

Not sure what people want from Rodgers. If we want a quick throw offense. Trade Rodgers. Find a guy like Cousins and we can all spend the next decade being slowly suffocated by boredom. 

Me personally? I'd like a great OL. Hire a staff that understands how to effectively use a tight end. Run the ball. Rodgers will take care of everything else. 

It will be interesting to see how Philbin/Campen choose the protection 'packages'.
As we know, MM was loathe to help the OL, even when it was obvious they needed it. I hope there is a good combination of getting rid of the ball quickly, maybe rolling away from the pressure, using the TE (NOT Graham) or RB to chip, or whatever it takes.
We sure don't need Aaron getting hurt late in the year to carry over into next year.

packerboi posted:

Sounds like Breeland will play.

Dealing with the deal.  

BrainDed posted:
GBFanForLife posted:

Do people really think the packers are running a new offense? Philbin is just running McCarthy's offense. He has been with McCarthy forever.

Yes, but snapping the ball sooner.   It was the same shit except the d wasn't able to to time the snap with the play clock hitting 0 simultaneously 85% of the time.    

And the hard count actually worked a time or two. Funny. 

Aaron and the hard count.......what did I hear he’s got like 9 cadences???  Nine different instructions at the line???  How do our offensive linemen remember those???  I only hear.“3 nineteen, 3 nineteen, hut........and newbies on the line??  I would call it a miracle if the Packers win.  And then win out.......Ah Detroit. 

Goldie posted:

Aaron and the hard count.......what did I hear he’s got like 9 cadences???  Nine different instructions at the line???  How do our offensive linemen remember those???  I only hear.“3 nineteen, 3 nineteen, hut........and newbies on the line??  I would call it a miracle if the Packers win.  And then win out.......Ah Detroit. 

As much as I want it to happen, we won’t win this game. And it’s not just the offensive line that I worry about. We cannot rush Mitch without exotic blitzes and he can run out of them. Without key defenders we cannot stop the run. We have waaaay to many players on IR. Many of our receivers are new and that includes the tight ends. Not an excuse just good reasons. It’s a shame because we have Rodgers, a good RB, and decent secondary. All positions we have missed in the past.

You mean “probably” won’t win this game. Better roster doesn’t guarantee anything in this League. Have to factor in turnovers, mistakes, coaching, matchups, momentum, etc.  

And emotion! And luck even.

And the Bears are coming off a big win, that can be an advantage.

All I know is, if the players want a win as badly as I do, that should help. Screw draft position, the Bears need to get knocked down a peg or two. 

Last edited by Pistol GB

Packers should win if they can hold the Bears to 13 (I'm skeptical).  

Last edited by michiganjoe
michiganjoe posted:

Packers should win if they can hold the Bears to 13 (I'm skeptical).  

Bye.

michiganjoe posted:

Packers should win if they can hold the Bears to 13 (I'm skeptical).  

The beginning of the end?  Pretty sure he's about to graduate.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×