Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Found on the internet: To open the season 2-0 — let alone both wins coming against division opponents — puts a team on the right track for the postseason. Since 2007, teams that start 2-0 have a 55.1% chance of reaching the postseason, though that trend has cooled the last few years.

In 2018, five of the seven teams to begin 2-0 did not make the playoffs and in 2016 and 2017 four of the eight teams that began those seasons with two victories were sitting home in January.

As for the Packers, a 2-0 start is relatively rare in the Aaron Rodgers era. Since taking over as the starter in 2008, this season is just the fifth time the Packers have won their first two games (with final regular-season record):

2008: 6-10

2010: 10-6, Super Bowl champions

2011: 15-1

2015: 10-6

Here's to hoping for sweet revenge for Super Bowl XXXII.  Okay, bad joke, there can never really be any revenge for that debacle. 

3-0 would look really nice after a 6-10 season.  The Packers haven't played well enough to think this is a "gimme" but this one in theory should be one of the lesser games on the schedule in terms of toughness.  Do not look ahead to the Eagles, focus on this one and make darn sure you've got a good plan to control Miller and Chubb.  Keep those guys from wreaking havoc on Rodgers and Co. and I like the Pack's chances. 

PackerHawk posted:

I expect they should win this week and next Thursday vs. Philly. Anything can happen of course but a 4-0 start looks like it's in the cards. 

I definitely like the chances more vs. Denver than Philly.  Wentz will be the best QB they've faced so far plus I think the Eagles have the best O-Line the Pack has faced. 

fightphoe93 posted:
PackerHawk posted:

I expect they should win this week and next Thursday vs. Philly. Anything can happen of course but a 4-0 start looks like it's in the cards. 

I definitely like the chances more vs. Denver than Philly.  Wentz will be the best QB they've faced so far plus I think the Eagles have the best O-Line the Pack has faced. 

I agree, but more because of the likelihood that Bakh will be much less likely to play on a short week. It took him all 7 days to get his back into shape to play against the Vikings and it's clear he's not himself given how well bull rushes are working on him so far this year. 

Flacco is a great test for Pettine's defense (now that he has some talent to implement his schemes) because he's the type of QB that always ate up Capers' defenses more than they should have. Steady, veteran QBs that didn't make stupid mistakes were always a problem for Dom's defenses (the superstar QBs ate them up too, but you expect that). 

The Thursday night games are often terrible because it's often just a war of attrition. Bakh may still be the 2nd most important player on offense (right up there with D. Adams) because he's both an All-Pro level player but also because the drop off to his backup is huge. Alex Light lining up at LT in a prime-time game would be a problem. Although at least it wouldn't be Jason Spriggs. 

Last edited by MichiganPacker2

RE: Eagles. They have lost one of their core DL in Malik Jackson. That's a huge loss. His back up, Tim Jerginson, left in a walking boot on Sunday. That looks like he could also miss GB. 

And then there's Alshon. Who's hurt again:

Oh. And I have said this a slew of times on here. I'll say it again. I'll say it next week. 

to Thursday night games. If the new CBA does ANYTHING, at least fix these TNF games. Complete bullshit. Completely unnecessary risk to player injuries. This coming from a league who claims to care so much about player safety.

NFLFU  

fightphoe93 posted:
PackerHawk posted:

I expect they should win this week and next Thursday vs. Philly. Anything can happen of course but a 4-0 start looks like it's in the cards. 

I definitely like the chances more vs. Denver than Philly.  Wentz will be the best QB they've faced so far plus I think the Eagles have the best O-Line the Pack has faced. 

Flacco this week will be the best QB they have faced. LOL.

I like Wentz but he looks really up and down this year - so far. 

packerboi posted:

Oh. And I have said this a slew of times on here. I'll say it again. I'll say it next week. 

to Thursday night games. If the new CBA does ANYTHING, at least fix these TNF games. Complete bullshit. Completely unnecessary risk to player injuries. This coming from a league who claims to care so much about player safety.

NFLFU  

Yes. Especially since there is a way that they could get almost as many Thursday games in by just setting it up so that two teams that had a bye the previous week could play the Thursday game. 

Having the game at home for the Thursday is a huge advantage as well, especially since the Packers don't have to travel back from a road game on Sunday. 

Boris posted:

Do away with Thursday night. It sucks.

If they MUST keep it, then Thursday games only after both teams have a bye.

Then..... ZOMG....how about (2) Thursday games!

Whoops. Let another million $$$ idea slip out

Why not Wednesday and Thursday night games? It's probably coming at some point. The only reason they stay away from Friday and Saturday is that they don't want to interfere with their free talent development programs (high school and college games). 

The Packers OL getting a lot of grief on local sports radio today for their play in the 1st 2 weeks. Week one was ugly, but consider the team they played. Of the 6 sacks Rodgers has taken in 2 games, you'd have to think a couple are probably on AR. 

And I think MLF has to make a decision on Jenkins vs Taylor. Those watching the tape say Elton is the better athlete and is making the most of the reps he's getting. If that's true and the rookie is the future at LG, then make a decision and make him the full-time starter.  This OL needs to gel and it's hard to do that when you still have moving pieces at G

Jenkins has held his own physically, but they may be wanting to bring him along slowly with the mental side. For all of Taylor's physical deficiencies, he's a savvy veteran OL who generally makes correct reads in pass pro. If we don't need Jenkins in there right away (which we don't, Taylor is fine), then I think bringing him along slowly is correct. I'm way more concerned about Billy Turner getting whipped by power moves than I am about Taylor. He's gotten worked over with that bull rush the first two weeks, can't have interior pressure when you're facing elite edge players. 

This is going to be another tough week for our OTs. The Vikings bull rushed the shit out of Bakhtiari and his fucked up back. He gave up a lot of hurries it seems. He's going to face another power rusher in Chubb this week, so I hope that back is healing up! Rodgers will need to get the ball out quick and do a better job stepping up int the pocket. Can't sit idle on a 7 or 10 step drop and wait, gotta step up or let the ball go. 

Last edited by Grave Digger

That's been AR's problem for awhile now (Getting the ball out quickly).  

I'm going to the game this weekend and am really looking forward to seeing the whole field.  TV cameras typically focus on the QB and we are left with seeing AR just dance around and hang onto the ball.  I am curious to see if guys are open and he isn't seeing them or if everybody is covered. 

Pakrz posted:

That's been AR's problem for awhile now (Getting the ball out quickly).  

I'm going to the game this weekend and am really looking forward to seeing the whole field.  TV cameras typically focus on the QB and we are left with seeing AR just dance around and hang onto the ball.  I am curious to see if guys are open and he isn't seeing them or if everybody is covered. 

Yep. No arguments here. For those wondering why AR is still occasionally showing that same habit, I think we have to remind ourselves he didn't get into the sandlot style football/waiting forever for a guy to get open overnight. 

That was years of being in an inept, stale offense where he developed those bad habits. Coupled with his complete disdain to throwing INT's. Then add to that, having a QB coach in Frank Cignetti who reportedly AR hated and had no respect for and a HC in MM who tuned out. 

I fully believe MLF can get AR out of those habits including some bad footwork he's still showing here and there. But it's going to take some time. 

The Packers got some help in the return game today, and depth in the secondary, signing Chefs CB Tremon Smith from waivers. His 26.8 AVG on kickoffs last year was fourth-best in the NFL. 

Mike Pettine is a great defensive coordinator, but this is taking defensive schemes and deception to a whole new level. If we sign just one more Smith on defense, we'll have officially entered the Matrix. 

 

 

I think a consistent pattern of successful play calling from MLF will be the only thing that gets AR calmed down. He played within the scheme through 3 series and got it done, but things started to stall and he seemed to revert to trying to do too much or overthink what needs to be done. Sometimes I think AR puts too much pressure on himself to win the game on his own at the expense of the game plan. Gameplans aren’t perfect and there’s plenty of room for improvisation, but there’s no clear strategy to AR’s style besides push the ball down the field with no concern for down, distance, game situation, etc. MFL had a good plan for MIN, more of that and I think AR will fully buy in and do it his way.

The Broncos offense was able to put up some yards on the Bears.  And Flacco passed for more yards than AR did against them.  And the Broncos had a pretty good drive at the end of the game.  

I don't think Flacco's gonna see another SB, or ProBowl for that matter.  But there's some talent on Denver.  And if there D is forceful, it could make for a long day for the Packers.  I don't see it as a gimme win at all.

fightphoe93 posted:

Here's to hoping for sweet revenge for Super Bowl XXXII.  Okay, bad joke, there can never really be any revenge for that debacle. 

3-0 would look really nice after a 6-10 season.  The Packers haven't played well enough to think this is a "gimme" but this one in theory should be one of the lesser games on the schedule in terms of toughness.  Do not look ahead to the Eagles, focus on this one and make darn sure you've got a good plan to control Miller and Chubb.  Keep those guys from wreaking havoc on Rodgers and Co. and I like the Pack's chances. 

To protect Rodgers from Miller and Chubb, Rodgers must get rid of the ball quicker than he usually does. Quick rhythm plays should help with that. Fangio and Co. got skewered by the refs against Chicago. They will be looking for some sort of redemption but, it will have to wait until next week. If Rodgers and the Offense plays to their potential and the Defense plays to their normal game, the Pack should win this one. GO PACK, GO!!!

Since he entered the league in 2017, Broncos left tackle Garrett Bolles has been penalized for holding 16 times. Those are just the penalties that were accepted, though.  Two of Bolles’ four holding penalties on Sunday were declined so he was only credited with two. He also held a fifth time but the penalty was incorrectly credited to guard Ron Leary. So, based on the numbers, it’s not surprising that Bolles has a reputation for holding. Speaking to media members Monday, Denver coach Vic Fangio indicated that Bolles may need to respond better to coaching.

“He’s just got to be a little bit more technique sound,” Fangio said. “I think he suffers from — you know, he thinks he’s in good position sometimes and dumps the guy at the end and thinks it’s a legal block. “We have to do a better job of explaining that to him. He’s got to do a better job of listening to the explaining.
But I think he can.”

Guy sounds like a mess. Time to meet the Smith Bros !!!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0

On one site I read that the Broncos bemoaned the lack of sacks. They attributed it to the fact that the opponents had quick passes. As of late, Rodgers is not known for quick passes. Perhaps when he looks at the tape Matt will encourage Aaron to do that more often. Too often the key to beating our offense has been to plaster our receivers and get Rodgers to hold on to the ball before a sack. The key for the Packers this week is to do what they did most of the first half on Sunday. Mix it up and play action to slow the rush and release the receivers.

Boris posted:

 Defense with 3 INT's off Shane Falco.

Offense doing just enough to win.

I see this game as a Cakewalk. Another snoozer.

3 weeks in a row against arguably a top 10 defense. 

I really hope you are right, but I don't see a "cakewalk" at all.  I am not swayed at all by the fact that the Broncos have not registered a sack yet. Between Vic Fangio's success against the Packers at both SF and CHI, and the presence of Von Miller and Chubb - combined with Rodgers' propensity for holding the ball way too long - this will be a very tough, physical game.  Packers better not be too high after that win over the Queens, because they will need to be sharp against a dangerous team searching to avoid an 0-3 start.  

Hungry5 posted:
RochNyFan posted:

Between Vic Fangio's success against the Packers at both SF and CHI... 

I know it's early, but I see a clear difference in the MLF offense versus what MM had been rolling out the past 5-6 seasons.

In SF Fangio had Willis & Bowman. Even so, minus the kaerperdinck game, SF never dominated the Pack. Y'all Forget the 23-20 playoff loss where Micah Hyde dropped a game sealing INT?

In Chicago, what "success" vs. the Pack? Rodgers always torches those fools.

Fangio is a good DC, that's obvious. I'm not falling for the "He's God vs Green Bay."

If the Packer O-Line blocks the Packers win. It's pretty simple.

Even if the Packers lose, it's an AFC loss & means little to nothing in the grand scheme. 

Last edited by Boris
Packdog posted:

Since he entered the league in 2017, Broncos left tackle Garrett Bolles has been penalized for holding 16 times. Those are just the penalties that were accepted, though.  Two of Bolles’ four holding penalties on Sunday were declined so he was only credited with two. He also held a fifth time but the penalty was incorrectly credited to guard Ron Leary. So, based on the numbers, it’s not surprising that Bolles has a reputation for holding. Speaking to media members Monday, Denver coach Vic Fangio indicated that Bolles may need to respond better to coaching.

“He’s just got to be a little bit more technique sound,” Fangio said. “I think he suffers from — you know, he thinks he’s in good position sometimes and dumps the guy at the end and thinks it’s a legal block. “We have to do a better job of explaining that to him. He’s got to do a better job of listening to the explaining.
But I think he can.”

Guy sounds like a mess. Time to meet the Smith Bros !!!

Good thing Bolles was already potty trained when they got him.

Boris posted:
Hungry5 posted:
RochNyFan posted:

Between Vic Fangio's success against the Packers at both SF and CHI... 

I know it's early, but I see a clear difference in the MLF offense versus what MM had been rolling out the past 5-6 seasons.

In SF Fangio had Willis & Bowman. Even so, minus the kaerperdinck game, SF never dominated the Pack. Y'all Forget the 23-20 playoff loss where Micah Hyde dropped a game sealing INT?

In Chicago, what "success" vs. the Pack? Rodgers always torches those fools.

Fangio is a good DC, that's obvious. I'm not falling for the "He's God vs Green Bay."

If the Packer O-Line blocks the Packers win. It's pretty simple.

Even if the Packers lose, it's an AFC loss & means little to nothing in the grand scheme. 

  This offense is not the same offense Fangio saw when he was with 40Whiners or daBears. What happened in the past means absolutly zilch. 

This should be a good opportunity for Tonyan. If he has any possibility to morphing into a number 1 TE, show that shit now. He had a great pass and catch last year against the Hags IIRC that went for a TD and a 28 yard completion in week 1. It's also time for AR to figure out a way to get this kid the ball. 

He's the fastest amongst this group (minus Sternberger who's on IR).  He can't be any worse of a blocker than Graham. This should be his Wally Pip moment

Proverbs 27:17, “As Iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another”

New offense facing 3 of the better defenses from 2018 is going to prove helpful down the road. Tough sledding for the O so far but it’s going to get better. 

I think Jimmy Graham in street clothes isn’t hurting anything. I don’t think Tonyan is a better blocker but he’ll make a better effort and is more dynamic as a pass threat. 

I think the NFL is catching on that Aaron Jones is massive matchup nightmare that’s only going to get worse in MLFs offense. 

I hope Kumerow gets more snaps now that Davis has been sent away. Finally. 

While I LOVED seeing the few times Rodgers lined up under center in the Chicago opener and watching Chicago try figure it out was fun. I didn’t expect to see it expand the way it did against Minny. Minny didn’t expect it either. 

New film is not easy to game plan for if the QB is Rodgers. 

Jeff Legwold ESPN Senior Writer 

And this from Broncos coach Vi Fangio Wednesday on the prospect of facing Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers this week: "He is one of the best of all time, there's not a lot that's given him a lot of trouble. One of the definitions of a great quarterback is there is really no one way to play him. So, we just have to mix it up on him. He's a great passer, quick release, great arm strength, mobile, scrambler, creator, and he's a great player.'' Fangio also said Rodgers has "athletic arrogance, which is a compliment. He just thinks he can do it.'' After two games the Broncos defense has no sacks and has not forced a turnover. Moments later Fangio was asked if he had concerns over the team's pass rush and he said: "Not at this point, one thing I will say is I was disappointed in our rush on the last drive (in the loss to the Bears). But prior to that in these first two games, they've been unusual games as it relates to pass rush.''

The Smith Bros. should be licking their chops:

Jeff Legwold ESPN Senior Writer 

On left tackle Garett Bolles' struggles with penalties -- five holding penalties in the first two games, including four this past Sunday in the loss to the Bears -- Broncos coach Vic Fangio said: "We talked to him early in the week, (offensive line coach) Mike (Munchak) did the bulk of it, I talked to him a little bit, I'm sure he's heard everybody else's comments indirectly, he knows what he's up against and what he has to do.'' On how much patience the Broncos would have with Bolles moving forward, Fangio said: "A good amount.''

packerboi posted:

This should be a good opportunity for Tonyan. If he has any possibility to morphing into a number 1 TE, show that shit now. He had a great pass and catch last year against the Hags IIRC that went for a TD and a 28 yard completion in week 1. It's also time for AR to figure out a way to get this kid the ball. 

He's the fastest amongst this group (minus Sternberger who's on IR).  He can't be any worse of a blocker than Graham. This should be his Wally Pip moment

I read someplace that Baylis was halfway decent as a blocking TE. And he has been on the PS so he probably knows the offense. I liked him in his limited time in preseason. I expect that he can help on Sunday.

fightphoe93 posted:
PackerHawk posted:

I expect they should win this week and next Thursday vs. Philly. Anything can happen of course but a 4-0 start looks like it's in the cards. 

I definitely like the chances more vs. Denver than Philly.  Wentz will be the best QB they've faced so far plus I think the Eagles have the best O-Line the Pack has faced. 

Philly is all banged up. Wentz was running for his life last week.  Our new defense  should be harassing Wentz all night long. For Denver, our O line has to be up to stopping Chubb and Miller before they get to Rodgers. Rodgers needs to get rid of the ball more quickly than he has.  Cover their WRs, in Sutton and Sanders, and we should be good. 4-0 sounds really good! GO PACK, GO!!!

Last edited by mrtundra
PackLandVA posted:
antooo posted:
 

Guy sounds like a mess. Time to meet the Smith Bros !!!

Good thing Bolles was already potty trained when they got him.

I don't know about that.  Seems like he's sh!t himself during the game several times already in his young career.

With all those holding calls, I expect the vikings to make an offer for him.

From SI:

"The Packers are one of five teams to have happily kept every kickoff in the end zone for a touchback. The result? With the Bears booting one kickoff out of the bounds in the opener, Green Bay’s average field position following a kickoff is the 27.5-yard line. That’s the third-best starting point in the league â€Ķ for doing nothing. "

Keep it up !!!  With a potential fumble and the way the NFLFU likes to throw flags, why bother ??!! 

It's somewhat remarkable that just a few years ago, getting to the 20 (+) yard line from a KOR from the end zone was pretty common.
Now, with the rule changes, it's not as common. Returns to the 25 are even rarer.

Packdog posted:

From SI:

"The Packers are one of five teams to have happily kept every kickoff in the end zone for a touchback. The result? With the Bears booting one kickoff out of the bounds in the opener, Green Bay’s average field position following a kickoff is the 27.5-yard line. That’s the third-best starting point in the league â€Ķ for doing nothing. "

Keep it up !!!  With a potential fumble and the way the NFLFU likes to throw flags, why bother ??!! 

Excellent point!  Add in it removes the risk of injury, and it makes even more sense.

Well, this is one way to bond as a Team Captain..

packerboi posted:

Well, this is one way to bond as a Team Captain..

Easily the best free agent signing since Woodson.  Very happy to have him leading this defense.  

ChilliJon posted:

Great. So a dinged up Graham is gonna make a go of it. That’s just fucking spectacular. 

One of the few things known about Jimmy, he don't miss games. IIRC, he had one season where he played like 11 games, almost every other seasons he's played it's been the full 16. 

He broke his thumb last season. Didn't matter, he played. 

He didn't play well, but he played. 

packerboi posted:
ChilliJon posted:

Great. So a dinged up Graham is gonna make a go of it. That’s just fucking spectacular. 

One of the few things known about Jimmy, he don't miss games. IIRC, he had one season where he played like 11 games, almost every other seasons he's played it's been the full 16. 

He broke his thumb last season. Didn't matter, he played. 

He didn't play well, but he played. 

Think his thumb injury led to a tipped pick in the EZ that should have been a TD. 

I get the guy is an all timer at TE. But how everyone can be cool with Clay in LA because his best days are in the rear view mirror but Graham just needs a chance is homerism on a grand scale. Graham looks about as done as done can look. And the last thing I want to see is done with a bad groin. 

Tonyan is a better option in this offense. He can’t block either (and while we’re here Lewis hasn’t exactly been a blocking force either) but Tonyan is a slightly poorer man’s version of George Kittle. 

packerboi posted:

Well, this is one way to bond as a Team Captain..

As opposed to some players who have to be chased to pay their bills... 

And I'll assume there's a lot of coughing in Arod's direction.... 

These first 2 games have taken a bit of a toll.

Shepherd and Burks still need another couple of weeks.
Good to see Hollman has worked his way back. Neck injuries are nasty.

Hate to see big Mo and Martinez are hurting. It's good that Brown can rotate in as needed. Might be a good week to see more of KeKe.
Fackrell and Graham...meh. Don't know if either of them would be sorely missed.
But if Kumerow can't go, that may limit some options at TE.
I wonder if Summers might get any snaps if Fackrell needs a spell or can't play? He normally sees lots of snaps.
Dexter may see some plays at RB if Jamaal has any troubles.

Hope Jenkins is excited for his first start!

packerboi posted:

Well, this is one way to bond as a Team Captain..

What, Applebee's wasn't taking reservations?

I know restaurants have a ridiculous markup on alcohol, but I'm sure I could find a perfectly adequate Garnacha or Viognier at the liquor store in the $20-30 range.

And no white zin or chardonnay, although I'm reminded of my niece's college graduation party, a backyard barbecue with lots of red meat perfect for red wine.  My sister had three bottles of wine out: white zin, chardonnay, and moscato.  Talk about stereotypes.

Pakrz posted:

Like everybody, I knew that Graham couldn't block but gave him a pass because his pass-catching abilities could be exceptional.  No matter the reason, the pass-catching isn't anywhere near where it needs to be so fuck that guy.  

I want to see Tonyan lining up at #1.  Get it done young man. 

The Packers just promoted Evan Bayliss from the PS. IS he going to be used as a blocker or a receiver more? Gute and MLF have expressed a liking for Bayliss's talents on the field based from his play in camp. Will we see more Bayliss than Tonyan? More Bayliss than Graham or Lewis?

packerboi posted:
Pakrz posted:

That's been AR's problem for awhile now (Getting the ball out quickly).  

I'm going to the game this weekend and am really looking forward to seeing the whole field.  TV cameras typically focus on the QB and we are left with seeing AR just dance around and hang onto the ball.  I am curious to see if guys are open and he isn't seeing them or if everybody is covered. 

Yep. No arguments here. For those wondering why AR is still occasionally showing that same habit, I think we have to remind ourselves he didn't get into the sandlot style football/waiting forever for a guy to get open overnight. 

That was years of being in an inept, stale offense where he developed those bad habits. Coupled with his complete disdain to throwing INT's. Then add to that, having a QB coach in Frank Cignetti who reportedly AR hated and had no respect for and a HC in MM who tuned out. 

I fully believe MLF can get AR out of those habits including some bad footwork he's still showing here and there. But it's going to take some time. 

Hope we don't get copy and paste 13 more times this year.

mrtundra posted:
Pakrz posted:

Like everybody, I knew that Graham couldn't block but gave him a pass because his pass-catching abilities could be exceptional.  No matter the reason, the pass-catching isn't anywhere near where it needs to be so fuck that guy.  

I want to see Tonyan lining up at #1.  Get it done young man. 

The Packers just promoted Evan Bayliss from the PS. IS he going to be used as a blocker or a receiver more? Gute and MLF have expressed a liking for Bayliss's talents on the field based from his play in camp. Will we see more Bayliss than Tonyan? More Bayliss than Graham or Lewis?

I like Baylis and we “Pay Less” for him.

Troy posted:
packerboi posted:

Well, this is one way to bond as a Team Captain..

Easily the best free agent signing since Woodson.  Very happy to have him leading this defense.  

Peppers was a pretty good signing. I might give it more than 2 games before declaring this signing to easily be the best since Woodson. 

ChilliJon posted:
packerboi posted:
ChilliJon posted:

Great. So a dinged up Graham is gonna make a go of it. That’s just fucking spectacular. 

One of the few things known about Jimmy, he don't miss games. IIRC, he had one season where he played like 11 games, almost every other seasons he's played it's been the full 16. 

He broke his thumb last season. Didn't matter, he played. 

He didn't play well, but he played. 

Think his thumb injury led to a tipped pick in the EZ that should have been a TD. 

I get the guy is an all timer at TE. But how everyone can be cool with Clay in LA because his best days are in the rear view mirror but Graham just needs a chance is homerism on a grand scale. Graham looks about as done as done can look. And the last thing I want to see is done with a bad groin. 

Tonyan is a better option in this offense. He can’t block either (and while we’re here Lewis hasn’t exactly been a blocking force either) but Tonyan is a slightly poorer man’s version of George Kittle. 

Tonyan is a lot closer to being on the practice squad than he is a legitimate starter. Same as Kumerow 

13X posted:
ChilliJon posted:
packerboi posted:
ChilliJon posted:

Great. So a dinged up Graham is gonna make a go of it. That’s just fucking spectacular. 

One of the few things known about Jimmy, he don't miss games. IIRC, he had one season where he played like 11 games, almost every other seasons he's played it's been the full 16. 

He broke his thumb last season. Didn't matter, he played. 

He didn't play well, but he played. 

Think his thumb injury led to a tipped pick in the EZ that should have been a TD. 

I get the guy is an all timer at TE. But how everyone can be cool with Clay in LA because his best days are in the rear view mirror but Graham just needs a chance is homerism on a grand scale. Graham looks about as done as done can look. And the last thing I want to see is done with a bad groin. 

Tonyan is a better option in this offense. He can’t block either (and while we’re here Lewis hasn’t exactly been a blocking force either) but Tonyan is a slightly poorer man’s version of George Kittle. 

Tonyan is a lot closer to being on the practice squad than he is a legitimate starter. Same as Kumerow 

Disagree. Too harsh.

YATittle posted:
13X posted:
ChilliJon posted:
packerboi posted:
ChilliJon posted:

Great. So a dinged up Graham is gonna make a go of it. That’s just fucking spectacular. 

One of the few things known about Jimmy, he don't miss games. IIRC, he had one season where he played like 11 games, almost every other seasons he's played it's been the full 16. 

He broke his thumb last season. Didn't matter, he played. 

He didn't play well, but he played. 

Think his thumb injury led to a tipped pick in the EZ that should have been a TD. 

I get the guy is an all timer at TE. But how everyone can be cool with Clay in LA because his best days are in the rear view mirror but Graham just needs a chance is homerism on a grand scale. Graham looks about as done as done can look. And the last thing I want to see is done with a bad groin. 

Tonyan is a better option in this offense. He can’t block either (and while we’re here Lewis hasn’t exactly been a blocking force either) but Tonyan is a slightly poorer man’s version of George Kittle. 

Tonyan is a lot closer to being on the practice squad than he is a legitimate starter. Same as Kumerow 

Disagree. Too harsh.

Maybe a bit harsh, but it's a more realistic take than thinking either can be a starting-caliber player  

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×