Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

El-Ka-Bong posted:
GBFanForLife posted:

Why does anyone really care what Ben Fennell thinks?

This is an interesting post, why should we attend to it?  

It is a free world, you don't have to reply to it. Just an honest question. Been seeing a lot of Ben Fennell references lately. Maybe people just like that he has the initials BF?

Every single time I hear "Cleveland Browns", I always recall the NFL Championship game following the '65 season. St. Vince's first Championship, and the beginning of the greatest dynasty.
Dominating them on both sides of the ball, and shutting down the "great" Jim Brown.... man, those were the days!

It's sad to think that today's Browns have no real connection to those teams of the '60's, and have become what they have become.

I've looked at this game as being the one that may largely determine MM's future with the club. He has been digging his own grave since ARod's injury, and a loss here could put him in it much faster than expected.
There's not a single reason why the Pack shouldn't dominate and win this game going away. Even if Callahan had to play, for whatever reason, I'd still expect them to win.
That being said, I have no idea which Hundley will play or how this game may unfold. And that's a scary thought.....

Timmy! posted:

Every single time I hear "Cleveland Browns", I always recall the NFL Championship game following the '65 season. St. Vince's first Championship, and the beginning of the greatest dynasty.
Dominating them on both sides of the ball, and shutting down the "great" Jim Brown.... man, those were the days!

It's sad to think that today's Browns have no real connection to those teams of the '60's, and have become what they have become.

I've looked at this game as being the one that may largely determine MM's future with the club. He has been digging his own grave since ARod's injury, and a loss here could put him in it much faster than expected.
There's not a single reason why the Pack shouldn't dominate and win this game going away. Even if Callahan had to play, for whatever reason, I'd still expect them to win.
That being said, I have no idea which Hundley will play or how this game may unfold. And that's a scary thought.....

Which Hundley?  How many are there?

Timmy! posted:

Every single time I hear "Cleveland Browns", I always recall the NFL Championship game following the '65 season. St. Vince's first Championship, and the beginning of the greatest dynasty.
Dominating them on both sides of the ball, and shutting down the "great" Jim Brown.... man, those were the days!

It's sad to think that today's Browns have no real connection to those teams of the '60's, and have become what they have become.

I've looked at this game as being the one that may largely determine MM's future with the club. He has been digging his own grave since ARod's injury, and a loss here could put him in it much faster than expected.
There's not a single reason why the Pack shouldn't dominate and win this game going away. Even if Callahan had to play, for whatever reason, I'd still expect them to win.
That being said, I have no idea which Hundley will play or how this game may unfold. And that's a scary thought.....

it really is kind of sad for what the Browns have become in the last 20 years or whatever it has been since they have been back.  The amount of ineptitude is insane.  They have had I think ONE playoff appearance since they have been back, I think they have lost 18 or 19 opening games in a row, have started 556 different Qb's, and have not won on a Sunday since Manziel was a starter.

But all of this makes me happy and warms my heart.  All of my ex wives family are die hard Browns fans and I hope their misery continues.  May sound petty but nope I don't care.

All kidding aside like DH13 I am VERY worried about this one and I immediately became worried when #12 went down. 

 

Per Bad Bob McGinn, The Browns have lost 2 of their best pass rushers for the year. The only one left worth anything is Myles Garett.

EDIT: The Browns are also 26th in the NFL in defensive scoring allowing 25.7 points per game. The Packers by comparison are 17th.

Their rushing defense is good, 6th in the NFL allowing 96.9 per game. The Packers are 14th in the NFL.

Last edited by packerboi
Brainwashed Boris posted:

Yeah they blew their shot to do something special with the loss to Pittsburgh.

I'm having nightmares of Josh Gordon with 400 yards receiving & 5 TD's this week

The Pitt game, while frustrating, at least showed they can compete. The real problem was the shutout nonsense against the Ravens--at home--coupled with the Lions loss.

Those are two games that should have been won but for terrible play calling and an inability to lead at the QB position. We should be 8-4 right now--no sarcasm.

If the Packers win out they have a 90% chance of getting in. Playing with the Playoffs machine with nothing off-the-wall crazy (unless you count going 4-0 by the Packers crazy) gets us the 6 seed and probably a trip to Minnesota if we win the Wild Card game.

Brainwashed Boris posted:

Yeah they blew their shot to do something special with the loss to Pittsburgh.

I'm having nightmares of Josh Gordon with 400 yards receiving & 5 TD's this week

You seem to have nightmares every week. Maybe you should get together with Josh Gordon, Lance Kendricks, Geronimo Allison and Aaron Jones, they could probably get you mellowed out.

Last edited by GBFanForLife
Brainwashed Boris posted:

Yeah they blew their shot to do something special with the loss to Pittsburgh.

I'm having nightmares of Josh Gordon with 400 yards receiving & 5 TD's this week

^^this^^  you are not the only one having this nightmare.  If Dom's D gives up that much I say leave him in Cleveland that would be a suitable punishment.

This has nothing to do with the Browns game, but I learned today that a good friend of mine died in his sleep last night.  72 years old.  We found each other at a sports bar in 1994 watching the Packers, don't remember the game.  Been watching with him ever since.

Two years ago he and I and another buddy went to an outdoors show (local South Carolina version of Ducks Unlimited) where they had an auction.  4 tickets for any Panthers home game were one of the items, 50 yard line, maybe 20 rows up.  Pack is visiting that year, so we'll go up to $600 and split four ways (with my son as the fourth).  We get to $500 and we're about to win, and I said something like "we're gonna get them."  He thought I told him to bid, so he did.  Ended up costing us $550.  We went, had a great time, Packers almost came back.  That was the game Newton ripped the Packer banner down in the end zone.

He would've loved x4.  Most negative guy I've ever watched games with.  Lots of examples, but here's my favorite:

Great play to seal a great victory.  Go to about the 30 second mark.  Rouse does his leap.  What does Alan have to say about the play?  "I thought he was supposed to be an athlete?  Can't even jump into the stands."

Sorry to derail a bit.  RIP, Alan. 

 

 

YATittle posted:

From JSO: To replace King on the 53-man roster, the Packers activated Demetri Goodson from the physically unable to perform list. Goodson did not practice Wednesday because he was nursing a hamstring injury.

When I first saw this I thought it has to be a joke right?  I saw where Simms picked the Browns this week and man I am getting nervous.

Browns are 6th best run defense (yds / game allowed), but are 6th worst in pts allowed, and 17th in passing yards allowed. They are -19 in turn-over margin, and are one of the worst in time of possession. CLE has a 31% 3rd down success, which is dead last in the league.

Even with a limited passing game, the Packers should win this game if they stick to the run game. 40+ rush attempts is needed.

Brainwashed Boris posted:

Deshon Kizer to Josh Gordon.

I'm already firing up the Bong & shaking my head in disgust.

With Josh Gordon in single coverage against Randall, House, or Goodson? I'm guessing Goodson since Dom will figure  what better way to reward a long, arduous rehab than by throwing him immediately into the deep end of the pool and seeing if he can survive.

I've seen enough improvement in the team the past couple weeks under Hundley that I think they find a way to win.  3 weeks ago I probably favor the Browns, but I think the Pack gets it done.

I will say this, the Browns will treat this as their Super Bowl knowing they face a team vulnerable without Rodgers.  It's one of their last chances for a win.

Lambeau Lobo posted:

If they win this and they beat the Bears in a couple weeks, they could lose the #1 overall pick.  I know players don't care about that, but you better believe that the front office wants the top pick.  Do you think that impacts the decision making within the organization?  I wouldn't dismiss the possibility.  

Brak posted:

This has nothing to do with the Browns game, but I learned today that a good friend of mine died in his sleep last night.  72 years old.  We found each other at a sports bar in 1994 watching the Packers, don't remember the game.  Been watching with him ever since.

 

So sorry you lost your friend, Brak. My sympathy to you and his family. Hugs.

pboi  -  from what I read, no scan until after the Browns game. The scan can limit healing so what I read was he had one right after the surgery and then will wait till the last moment before the next scan and possible activation to the 53.

Since he technically can't be activated until week from tomorrow, he probably gets scanned Thursday after practice. Then if cleared, he is activated on Friday (15th).

Hungry5 posted:

Since he technically can't be activated until week from tomorrow, he probably gets scanned Thursday after practice. Then if cleared, he is activated on Friday (15th).

The issue with waiting all the way to next Thursday to x-ray him, is who then practices with the 1's all week next week (assuming the Pack wins Sunday)?

Rodgers would benefit from being with the 1's all week and shaking off the rust as much as he can. If the scan shows it's not healed quite yet, then there would be no point in having him practice all week with the 1's. That should then be #7.

According to local blabber I heard on the radio today, the Packers would have likely not put him in pads unless they already knew or felt almost certain he's good to go. Rationale being, no wouldn't be hit in padded practice, but yes he's running around the field full speed and could fall or risk some inadvertent contact. The mood in the locker room was apparently pretty upbeat today as well.

link 1

We won't find out the answer to that question until next week after the Packers take on the Cleveland Browns. According to Jason Wilde of ESPN Wisconsin, the Packers will have Rodgers' collarbone scanned at that time. The reason the Packers aren't doing it now is they don't want extra radiation being pumped into his body according to Wilde.



Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×