I just flipped my Packers calendar to November and here's what I saw...
That's what you call a good omen! #17
Attachments
Images (1)
DH13 posted:Soooooo. Z, Gary and Keke were pulled over and Z was cited for possession. Weed.
I don’t believe that weed is good to be on when driving. I don’t like it when drivers are impaired. But usually smoking weed results in driving too slow. 81 in a 60 is too fast.
Wifey & I take CBD's occasionally. Helpful for relaxing
https://fox11online.com/sports...marijuana-possession
Christ almighty, just legalize it already. So lame when half the nation laughs at these "citations"
PackerPatrick posted:DH13 posted:Soooooo. Z, Gary and Keke were pulled over and Z was cited for possession. Weed.
I don’t believe that weed is good to be on when driving. I don’t like it when drivers are impaired. But usually smoking weed results in driving too slow. 81 in a 60 is too fast.
No signs of impairment and no DUI charged.
Unlike this guy
I think it should be required for all commuters.
No criminal charges for Z, but can Goodell suspend him if he wants?
He can and he will suspend him because it’s still a band substance
No wonder there's such a large turnout for "team nights".
Haven’t been keeping up on what the League does on a first offense, but I think under the current CBA he just earned himself extra urine tests. Put himself on the radar, so to speak.
I don’t think a first offense gets him a lengthy suspension (if any), but a future dirty test would.
So it doesn’t start out as a big deal, but it could turn into one in a heartbeat if he doesn’t quit weed.
packfanincolorado posted:This better not be a trap game.
Why do we refuse to just fucking enjoy success?
YooperPackfan posted:He can and he will suspend him because it’s still a band substance
Depends on the band. Those Sousa kids are wild.
Pakrz posted:packfanincolorado posted:This better not be a trap game.
Why do we refuse to just fucking enjoy success?
Because it's a trap!
“Don’t worry. Bout a thing. Cause every little thing. Gonna be all right”
Sing it. Loud.
Henry posted:YooperPackfan posted:He can and he will suspend him because it’s still a band substance
Depends on the band. Those Sousa kids are wild.
New kids on the Block?
Pistol GB posted:PackerPatrick posted:DH13 posted:Soooooo. Z, Gary and Keke were pulled over and Z was cited for possession. Weed.
I don’t believe that weed is good to be on when driving. I don’t like it when drivers are impaired. But usually smoking weed results in driving too slow. 81 in a 60 is too fast.
No signs of impairment and no DUI charged.
Going 81 in a construction zone with a car carrying passengers and something deemed illegal seems impaired to me. Or at least poor judgment.
Henry posted:YooperPackfan posted:He can and he will suspend him because it’s still a band substance
Depends on the band. Those Sousa kids are wild.
Oh for crying out loud, I can’t believe I did that, UGH!!
PackerPatrick posted:Pistol GB posted:PackerPatrick posted:DH13 posted:Soooooo. Z, Gary and Keke were pulled over and Z was cited for possession. Weed.
I don’t believe that weed is good to be on when driving. I don’t like it when drivers are impaired. But usually smoking weed results in driving too slow. 81 in a 60 is too fast.
No signs of impairment and no DUI charged.
Going 81 in a construction zone with a car carrying passengers and something deemed illegal seems impaired to me. Or at least poor judgment.
As we all know, 20 somethings are known for their good judgement.
Henry posted:PackerPatrick posted:Pistol GB posted:PackerPatrick posted:DH13 posted:Soooooo. Z, Gary and Keke were pulled over and Z was cited for possession. Weed.
I don’t believe that weed is good to be on when driving. I don’t like it when drivers are impaired. But usually smoking weed results in driving too slow. 81 in a 60 is too fast.
No signs of impairment and no DUI charged.
Going 81 in a construction zone with a car carrying passengers and something deemed illegal seems impaired to me. Or at least poor judgment.
As we all know, 20 somethings are known for their good judgement.
True. I have been guilty of that myself. And Z was a stand up guy when he took it on himself. I admire that. My complaint about his actions has to do with speeding in a construction zone. I travel a lot every summer and people who do that risk other peoples lives. That’s nothing to sneeze at. For all I know, the arrest may have been bogus but the actions that preceded it was poor judgment at best.
YATittle posted:I'm really digging Lizard as I watched the game. I think there's a place for him in the offense, a trustworthy possession receiver who isn't a deep threat but is reliable and uses his height to his advantage.
5-5 vs KC. Most reliable WR we have until Davante comes back.
Seems logical there will be more opportunities for everyone with Adams on the field.
Boris posted:Wifey & I take CBD's occasionally. Helpful for relaxing
https://fox11online.com/sports...marijuana-possession
Christ almighty, just legalize it already. So lame when half the nation laughs at these "citations"
You'd think the NFL would be leading the push for legalization. So many players are using it, now, for pain control, etc., that the NFL could be missing out on revenue from not sponsoring it.
The citations are such bullshit. Gestapo action. The cop supposedly smelled weed, 3 blunts, that was stored in the duffel bag in the back of a Yukon while standing outside the driver side window.
Give me a fucking break. Unless this cops mother was a blood hound, thats just not realistic probable cause. This super sense cop then handcuffs 3 citizens without any physical evidence of wrong doing to search their property.
This bullshit needs to end.
Which part of this scenario is bullshit that needs to end? The reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop? The probable cause for the search? The detainment of the occupants of the vehicle? The citation? The prohibition of marijuana in general?
Make your case and back it up with facts related to the constitution and case law rather than your opinion.
I'll hang up and listen.
This oughta be good....
The cop's sense of smell for one. (Drug dogs, FWIW, are basically probable cause generators.) As for doing 81 in a construction zone, was there any construction work going on at the time? The report doesn't say.
Pakrz posted:Which part of this scenario is bullshit that needs to end? The reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop? The probable cause for the search? The detainment of the occupants of the vehicle? The citation? The prohibition of marijuana in general?
Make your case and back it up with facts related to the constitution and case law rather than your opinion.
I'll hang up and listen.
Because it's a well known fact that cops olfactory senses are greatly diminished due to sticking their own heads up their asses.
Science man, science.
@Fedya
The courts have stated that an odor of marijuana in a vehicle triggers probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of the vehicle. I have no reason to question the officer's ability to smell marijuana in this instance since the search of the vehicle revealed exactly what he smelled.
A contstruction zone is a construction zone. Besides, the driver was well over the speed limit to begin with. Your argument is weak. Do better if you're going to chime in with dumb.
Henry posted:Pakrz posted:Which part of this scenario is bullshit that needs to end? The reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop? The probable cause for the search? The detainment of the occupants of the vehicle? The citation? The prohibition of marijuana in general?
Make your case and back it up with facts related to the constitution and case law rather than your opinion.
I'll hang up and listen.
Because it's a well known fact that cops olfactory senses are greatly diminished due to sticking their own heads up their asses.
Science man, science.
Now THAT is a compelling argument!
Pakrz posted:Which part of this scenario is bullshit that needs to end? The reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop? The probable cause for the search? The detainment of the occupants of the vehicle? The citation? The prohibition of marijuana in general?
Make your case and back it up with facts related to the constitution and case law rather than your opinion.
I'll hang up and listen.
The probable cause. There is no way the cop smelled 3 blunts stored with tobacco in duffle bag in the back of the truck. Anyone who has experience with weed will know how incredibly unlikely that is.
It’s a BS excuse that cops can use to conduct a search.
If they were smoking it in the car, sure. But officer blood hound surely would have done a field sobriety test if that was the case. He didn’t, because they weren’t smoking.
What’s the repercussions of Officer Blood Hound is wrong? You got 3 innocent men detained in handcuffs because of a smell? That is bullshit.
Smoke em ya got em...at home.
Pretty simple if you think about it.