There's a Joe Bag O' Doughnuts on RC who's a total Pole Smoker. Coincidence? I think not.
Look for a Notre Dame Jesus reference while you're there. Maybe we can wrap this up with 2 fish in one newspaper.
Packiderm posted:There's a Joe Bag O' Doughnuts on RC who's a total Pole Smoker. Coincidence? I think not.
My name is a tribute to packer great Frank Winters, who John Madden would call Frankie Baggadonuts.
You're not much of a Packer fan if you didn't know that.
Disappointing!
Sorry I couldn't help it!
Tearing me up with sympathy versus mockery here.
The struggle is real! I don't want to go to internet hell.
Pistol GB posted:The struggle is real! I don't want to go to internet hell.
Don’t you have to register to get onto Rube Chat?
It will be just my luck if he's an innocent 12 year-old somewhere getting all warped and ready to go Slenderman on someone.
Each and every day I swear.
Frankie is like Goofy at Disney World...no matter how we poke him or bait him, he stays in character.
Until we grab his donuts.
Stop it I'm dying!!!!!!!!!
I can't breathe.
EDIT: This is all Henry's fault. I used to be a good poster and a nice guy. Now look at me. Straight to hell.
Frankie Baggadonuts posted:Packiderm posted:There's a Joe Bag O' Doughnuts on RC who's a total Pole Smoker. Coincidence? I think not.
My name is a tribute to packer great Frank Winters, who John Madden would call Frankie Baggadonuts.
You're not much of a Packer fan if you didn't know that.
Disappointing!
Hateful!
I've been a Packet fan long before Frankie Bag O'Winters and his drinking buddy Brent Favor were a twinkle in their fathers eyes.
Pistol GB posted:I used to be a good poster and a nice guy.
You did? 
Good thing "not smurf" friend is here for you.
Henry posted:Good thing "not smurf" friend is here for you.
You scored that point alright.
Frankie Baggadonuts posted:I dont get the smurf thing.
They are little blue creatures who like to wear hot pants and dance hand in hand. They have a habit of constantly reappearing.
Let's put this in a context you understand. You're herpes.
The best PREDICTIVE NFL stats in the bizness says this about your Green Bay Packers...pretty damn good report card mid season...run defense is fixable when it counts cuz it's just emotion and attitude if you want it.
Courtesy of Cold Hard Football Facts:
Are the Packers for real? Maybe. A lot can change from week-to-week, and a simple loss by the 49ers would likely vault Green Bay to the top of NFC consideration. They're pretty close to that already: third in the Intelligence Index, sixth in Passer Rating Differential (right in the range of serious super Bowl contender) and third in Real QBR Differential. Those all seem like the kind of numbers that foretell of a potential Super Bowl run if things keep breaking right. That's not to say there isn't room for and a need for improvement. The Packers rank 13th in both of the Hog Indexes (that's actually better than the Patriots in the Offensive Hog Index but far down the list on the defensive side). More worryingly, they're 21st in Defensive Rusher Rating and have truly struggled to stop the run against opponents with a competent rushing attack. That will probably have to improve for Green Bay to keep playing into February, but there's time for that to come, starting this week with a primetime matchup with the Chiefs. Even without Pat Mahomes, that's could prove a telling game
BrainDed posted:TouchdownWhitewaterJesus posted:R MaN posted:Packers are 4.5 favorites
Betting lines are used to do one thing, bring in bets.
Sure.. and the ultimate goal that bringing the bets works toward is making money for the Casino. Therefore it behooves the casino to place a number that will draw equal action on both sides (They win regardless of outcome because they collect the juice or vig, typically 10%). In other words, an accurate number.
That is not really true either...the casino's in effect shade it toward placing their own bets...because they have the best numbers in the business...so they do not try to balance so much as they shade it toward house advantage long term.
They leave way way too much money on the table only taking a 50/50 vig...and this is why some lines don't make sense to Joe Six pack
Pakrz posted:fightphoe93 posted:For whatever reason, Packers' teams have not fared particularly well in Kansas City over the years. That said, this a completely different couple of teams from ones that have lost in KC in the past. The Chiefs gave the 2011 Packers their only regular season loss. I believe the 2007 team is the only one that I can remember that actually won a game in KC.
I am going into this game thinking it's going to be high scoring no matter who the QB is. I remember even in 2017 when Alex Smith was a QB, he was lighting up the scoreboard for much of that season and was an MVP candidate. He's obviously better than Matt Moore, but it shows that Mahomes isn't the only reason the Chiefs have had a great offense the past few years.
2011, 2007, etc. have absolutely nothing to do with a game being played in 2019.
Surprisingly...there are many of these types of long term trends in the NFL...and for whatever reason...that we do not understand...some teams just can't do it in certain stadiums...teams ect.
And if I remember right...the Chiefs put a crimp in one of our playoff runs early years under Bert...they almost blueprinted us in a game where they dominated and locked us down good.
The Chiefs running game is not good.
They will attack the short passing game and take advantage of our db's inability to tackle.
Henry posted:Frankie Baggadonuts posted:I dont get the smurf thing.
They are little blue creatures who like to wear hot pants and dance hand in hand. They have a habit of constantly reappearing.
Let's put this in a context you understand. You're herpes.
You're a butt hole. Ha
Are you asking for a friend?
Well I was....err,....uhh,...yes! Asking for a friend.
Frankie Baggadonuts posted:I dont get the smurf thing.
You don't get a lot of things... not the least of which is a Super Bowl trophy.
They just opened up a Vikings museum next to their practice facility. It's where all their fossilized hopes and dreams are on display.
They have a full skeletal Shankopotumus right next the Failosaurus.
This is Chiefs week, why are we talking about the smurfheads?
The shorter list is things/people that don't.
Henry posted:Because you make my balls itch.
I recommend the 'pinch and roll' technique.
Pakrz posted:Frankie Baggadonuts posted:I dont get the smurf thing.
You don't get a lot of things... not the least of which is a Super Bowl trophy.
4 of them!
Frankie Baggadonuts posted:Pakrz posted:Frankie Baggadonuts posted:I dont get the smurf thing.
You don't get a lot of things... not the least of which is a Super Bowl trophy.
4 of them!
You must of studied at Minnesota Institute of Theoretical Winning.
0 x 4 = 4
Big names on D, but that's also their starting left side of the O-line that'll be missing action.