Henry posted:If we want to do a hyper capitalist cost benefit analysis, yes, talent vs. poopy diapers might account for it. Again, don't tell me he isn't better than half the scrub backups in this league.
Well considering the owners and commissioner of the league are all capitalists... I’m guessing that they have accountants and marketing/PR people that will tell them what the win/loss in $$$ is on hiring the guy.
If that assessment come out as 99% likely a money loss (even if a small $ loss) then he doesn’t get hired.
The question isn’t - is he better than the worst quarterback on a NFL roster currently?
the question is - does he make us money?
now he can do that in 2 ways - winning, successful teams sell more merch
or by personal popularity - the jerseys I own aren’t for players like tony mandarich.
”Kaepernick is the key to winning a Super Bowl this year” - said no one in 2019
apparently there aren’t enough people willing to buy a Kaepernick bengals jersey to pay him 3 million dollars (or whatever backups earn)