Peppers shows the Bears he's not out of gas, three sacks and a forced fumble, which Hawk runs in for a TD.
Rodgers finds Boykin for two TDs, Cobb for one, and everyone does RELAX.
Packers 34, Bears 24
Peppers shows the Bears he's not out of gas, three sacks and a forced fumble, which Hawk runs in for a TD.
Rodgers finds Boykin for two TDs, Cobb for one, and everyone does RELAX.
Packers 34, Bears 24
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Fearing Sam Shields is too short to cover Alshon Jeffery the Packers sign Manute Bol to play CB. Packer fans go completely ape-schit about the signing, claiming how could anyone who played in the NBA possibly know anything about playing defense...?!?!
They were right. Also Manute Bol doesn't like to run.
Bears - 63
Packers - 48
I'm pretty sure a fumble could outrun Hawk.
Manute does block 4 extra points and a field goal
He would have blocked more kicks but Manute Bol doesn't like to jump either.
Less likely to tear your acl that way.
I don't have my finger on the pulse of the network for dead celebs and sports heroes (pun intended). It does explain why Manute Bol doesn't like to run & jump though.
As always I will defer to your obvious expertise in all things dead.
Tottenham Hotspur 0 Arsenal 3. Yup, another schitty sports weekend for me.
Thanks crypt-keeper
Pack wins in a route, 38 - 10. Our offense comes to life and the D makes vajay-jay go all vajay-jay. Book it!
Too much talent on the offensive side of the ball for it to not eventually emerge. Offense comes out of its funk and combines with an improving defense for the victory.
Pack 34
Bears 24
Didn't know where to post this.....hope it hasn't been already.
Green Bay - The following is a summary of coach Mike McCarthy's post-practice press conference Thursday (the injury report is listed first):
INJURY REPORT
MIKE MCCARTHY
And that's it for McCarthy. We'll have updates from assistant coaches and players later this afternoon.
and forgot to say.....another horrible loss.... GB 23 - Bears 35 They remember the Packers knocked them off the last game of the season last year....and they're going to be hot. JMHO, and I hope I'm soooooooooooooooo wrong.
Bears 38-30
Dam starts to leak...Like your mom - too many holes not enough fingers.
Packers stock shares drop big time Monday morning on the exchanges.
At least I got tickets to the Panther-Packer game for my birthday ! Theyll still be
mathematically alive!
MM made a comment that lining up CM3 in the same position makes it easier on the offense.
Saw a stat today the GB has run offensive plays from their Zebra formation (3 WRs, 1 TE, 1RB) 78.4% of the time this year.
That does sound like talking out both sides of your ass.
Got to start changing things up this week.
There's NO way the Pack lose this game. It's just not going to happen. Nope!
Originally Posted by ChilliJon:
Saw a stat today the GB has run offensive plays from their Zebra formation (3 WRs, 1 TE, 1RB) 78.4% of the time this year.
Product of the no-huddle, fewer substitutions.
I get the no huddle has led to almost 80% of the plays being run from the same formation.
What I don't get is running an offense with almost 80% of the plays being run from the same formation.
Im sure it's not lost on anyone that the Packers longest play of the year (80 yards to Jordy) was run out of a 2TE big set with PA.
MM has forgotten more football knowledge than I'll ever acquire. But damn he can be maddening at times.
MM knows what he's doing and Dom Capers doesn't?quote:MM made a comment that lining up CM3 in the same position makes it easier on the offense.
Saw a stat today the GB has run offensive plays from their Zebra formation (3 WRs, 1 TE, 1RB) 78.4% of the time this year.
That does sound like talking out both sides of your ass.
Both countries are empty, they're all here making your pancakes and then pouring on the maple syrup.
It sucks that central Ohio gets the Pittsburgh game. Might be BW3 time.
Won't start picking against the Pack now.
Pack 34
Barz 2
31-17
Pack first three opponents all tied for 1st in rush D giving up 2.8 YPC. Not necessarily weighed down by Packer games as GB outperformed the average against each. Bears giving up 5.0 per carry.
GB D only giving up 3.7 per carry against RBs (WR/QB runs excluded) and only 3.06 since Lattimore took over. Bears are dead last in running the ball. (while they've also faced three top 10 run d's, they appear to be a big contributor to their opponents' numbers.)
Getting the Pack running game back on track will do great for the O, and I like the D's chances of minimizing damage in the passing game.
Pack 30-24.
As much as I'd like to pick the Bears in this game, I can't. After being humbled in Detroit, the Pack should be focused and ready for a dinged-up Bears' team coming off consecutive road games (to both coasts) and a short week of prep.
27-21 Pack.
B-N-D
Then maybe we can prop him up on the sideline and put a clip board in his hands. We could use a coach who doesn't think to much.
The NFC North standings are all off kilter. They need balance and correction. Lions and Bears both lose this weekend. Parity says it will happen. It's the Packers "turn" to win.
The Vikings will also lose, but not because of parity, but because they suck ass.
Relaxed Packers 38
Chitcago Bares 30
Rodgers Is Like Montana
RILM
Bears get a RILM job. It's @Houston the redux? It's got that vibe.
Avg game for Clay = Pack by 7
Above Avg game for Clay = Pack by 17
So....
Packers 39 Barelies 22
Yay, i'm in a red state! Pack 31-28
I have a good feeling about this one. Packers 37-16 and it doesn't feel that close.
Packers will have the lead going into the 4th quarter and we'll see a steady dose of Lacy and Starks, Pack wins 27 to 17.
I have a good feeling about this one. Packers 37-16 and it doesn't feel that close.