Skip to main content

@Fandame posted:

The HOF is getting pretty watered down; this year there are a couple I question as well. It seems like voters are in many ways choosing guys who got ink rather than who earned it with blood, sweat, and tears. It lost some of its meaning when they voted in Terrell Davis in the class of 2017. I wasn't a huge fan of Warner either; I thought he was borderline. Since then, I've felt "meh." I do like reading the bios of the historical guys and guys who played decades and decades ago...

Writers are by any objective wordsmiths. Very few of them have evolved into thinkers. And sportswriters are a particularly lazy bunch who will do the barest minimum in the way of research. Football players are even worse. These are the bulk of the voters.

Take the name literally. It is called the Hall of Fame and Leroy was never famous because he played with Reggie and Brett and never got on TV.

Lynch got in I believe also because the Bucs don't have many in the HOF and guys like Butler and Tim McDonald (who has better stats and more Pro Bowls than Butler) are not in...Packers and 49ers have a bunch of HOF.

If you are someone that hasn't played in a decade plus, you have to have a vocal media advocate to get you noticed. Took over a decade for Jerry Kramer's daughter to get him noticed enough by enough voters to get him in. And she was relentless about it...total grassroots effort.

Sterling Sharpe still needs to get in. If those clowns put in Boselli (after doing it with Terrell Davis), then they’re demonstrating once again that length of career doesn’t really count that much. Still arguably a top ten all time WR.

On Lynch and Alstott, let’s face it if either weren’t getting constant love from John Madden then they wouldn’t have gotten Pro Bowl slots and HoF mentions. If Nate Newton hadn’t been such a coke head then Madden-love probably would’ve got him in too.

Last edited by ilcuqui

He probably has one (an argument for Lynch) but it's probably one of two things (or both). He's not going to readily admit to either one.

1. Lynch has given him some inside scoops on personnel matters after he became the Niners GM.

2. The classy Tony Dungy advocates strongly for Lynch, and King and Dungy spent a lot of time together on football pregame shows the last few years.

Lynch made 9 Pro Bowls to Butler's 4, but Butler had more interceptions, sacks, made more All-Pro teams, was 1st team all decade in 90s (Lynch was 2nd team in the 2000s), and was the key person in one of the most iconic plays in NFL history (Lambeau Leap).

Just like the only thing he has on Butler (Pro Bowls), it's a popularity contest.

More All-Pro teams? Telling!

@ChilliJon posted:

I’ll never understand how Kurt Warner is in the Hall. Bert Jones was twice the QB.

Warner had such a weird career. He didn't play until he was 28 years old and then had three great years. 98 TD passes and the Rams had a 35-8 record. Two Super Bowls, one ring, and a great narrative.

Then, 5 terrible years after he had shell shock from the Martz system (which spread the field at the expense of protecting the QB).

The teams he started for went 5-23 and he had 27 TDs against 30 interceptions in those 28 games.

Then, 3 strong years with the Cards getting them to the Super Bowl. 93 TDs.

Basically, the voters just ignored those middle 5 years of his career.

@ilcuqui posted:

Sterling Sharpe still needs to get in. If those clowns put in Boselli (after doing it with Terrell Davis), then they’re demonstrating once again that length of career doesn’t really count that much. Still arguably a top ten all time WR.

On Lynch and Alstott, let’s face it if either weren’t getting constant love from John Madden then they wouldn’t have gotten Pro Bowl slots and HoF mentions. If Nate Newton hadn’t been such a coke head then Madden-love probably would’ve got him in too.

Alstott was more because of Chris Berman's ESPN highlight shows, but he did score 71 TDs.

@Pakrz posted:

Agree GL.  Lynch was a household name around the NFL when he was playing.  He just got a lot of publicity.  Same goes for Mike Alstott... and I always thought he couldn't carry William Henderson's dirty jockstrap.  

Mike Alstott was no fullback. He was an average RB but an elite short yardage back. We shouldn’t put guys in the HOF for that.

@Goalline posted:

Mike Alstott was no fullback. He was an average RB but an elite short yardage back. We shouldn’t put guys in the HOF for that.

Agreed.

Compare these two RBs. They were almost exactly the same size (6'1, 250). Both guys played college football in the Big 10 and were 2nd round picks.

Player A. 11 seasons. 5088 yards rushing, 3.7 yards/carry, 58 rushing TDs, 305 receptions, 7.5 yards/reception, 13 receiving TDS. 71 total TDs. Played in one Super Bowl (team won)

Player B.  8 seasons. 5626 yards rushing, 3.8 yards/carry, 76 rushing TDs, 175 receptions, 7.6 yards/reception, 6 receiving TDs. 82 total TDs. Team lost one Super Bowl

Player B had more yardage, rushing TDs, and total TDs in 3 fewer seasons.

Alstott is Player A. Pete Johnson of the Bengals (1977-84) is Player B.

When was the last time anyone mentioned Pete Johnson as a Hall of Famer? Alstott just has good PR.

Last edited by MichiganPacker2

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×