Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Boras thinks that his client Lohse was diserviced by the current CBA. He said that the draft pick compensation rule drove down the price on Lohse and he did not receive money equal to Dempster - who was older and less effective than Lohse.

3/33 is not a bad deal for Lohse IMO. I think we will be regretting the deal in year 3, but hopefully in year 1/2 he gives us sub 4 ERAs.
I would agree with anyone who believes that you build your team through the draft. If you draft good players and they turn out eventually they will get to the bigs. I would love to see what the percentage is for the Brewers of the number of players they draft that make it to the big leagues with either Milwaukee or a team the draft choice was traded to. Doug and Mark chose Lohse based on what they believe he will give the team based on what he has done the last few years. If we get two good years out of Lohse, it's a win for the Brewers. There is no guarantee that the 17th pick in the draft will make it.
3 years, 33 million and a first round pick is to high for Loshe. That is my problem.

I can live without the pick, I would just hope that the return would be more than Loshe. I can live with Loshe, just don't like those dollars/years/pick being part of the package.

I'm going to do some research on this "good players who were drafted eventually playing in the major leagues" theory though. That might just have legs.
HardballTalk ‏@HardballTalk 4m Adam Wainwright’s deal announced: he gets a no-trade clause http://dlvr.it/38MJ9K

Wainwright gets a five-year, $97.5 million contract. And a kicker that wasn’t reported: a no-trade clause.

Wainwright, 31, posted a 3.94 ERA, 1.25 WHIP and 184/52 K/BB ratio across 198 2/3 innings in 2012. Now, one more year removed from Tommy John reconstructive elbow surgery surgery, he feels like someone poised for a big year.

Lohse the last two years (ERA/WHIP/IP):

2011: 3.39/1.168/188
2012: 2.86/1.090/211
His first outing in Arizona was pretty darn good. I don't think Wolf or Suppan brought the same degree of pedigree that Lohse brings. Neither Wolf or Suppan had that ability to put the ball where they wanted it on a consistent basis and they didn't have that big out pitch when they couldn't spot the ball. I may eat my words later in the season but I think he will be a huge addition to this staff.
well, then Wolf's credentials were just as good as Lohse any day of the week.

Wolf was an all star (once, whoo hoo!), Lohse never was. Wolf had an ERA under 4 five times (once as a Brewer), Lohse two times (last year 2.86). Prior to signing with Milwaukee, they both pitched about the same innings and struck out guys at about the same pace. Lohse gives up less walks (pound that strike zone!) and less homers (but not much). Wolf pitched 100% more from the left side than Lohse does. Wolf was two years younger. Career numbers favor Wolf.

If by pedigree (or credentials), you mean one really great season, then Lohse wins. Last year was great for him.

I guess Suppan is a better comparison based on your (arbitrary) criteria. He won a WS game right before we signed him.
I don't think it is unfair to look at the whole picture, but Dave Duncan gave Lohse a new pitch and changed who he was. The picture is different from that point on (albiet, older...)

Mark A. had Suppan over for supper and was very impressed. There was some comment about both of them being Catholic, which was exaggerated into the "reason" Mark A. fell so deeply in love with Suppan the pitcher. I don't think that converting to Catholicism will get you a meal with, or a contract with, Mark A.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×