Skip to main content

I have defended MM's play calling in the past. Mostly because we have outplayed other teams man on man. I think that it worked because of that. I have not seen many open lanes for the RBs and open receivers. I believe that some of that is on the players. One the other hand we have not adjusted well. That's on the coaching staff. Adjustments  would have helped but can only do so much. Perhaps nothing more can be done this year. I cringe at the thought of a coaching and GM change. Perhaps, all we can expect is a new season with some draft picks next year and some maturation from our current rookies.

Dumping the GM while keeping the coach always seems to be a bit tricky, unless that GM is an internal promotion. I haven't been one to clamor for Elliot because I honestly can't name one thing he's done, but he's reportedly sought after in the league. IF he's still hotly pursued an IF the powers that be are growing weary of Ted's ability/long term plans, I suppose that's a move that's certainly possible. Even if it's Ted "stepping down."

Last edited by IL_Pack_Fan

just dawned on me that I don't recall seeing Trevor Davis on the field last Sunday, and sure enough he wasn't.  found the below online.  either Geronimo is all that or?  how does a practice squad rookie move ahead of a rookie that's been on the 53 all along?  is Geronimo that good or is Trevor being punished for his muff, or...

November 21, 2016 1:50 pm

Packers' Trevor Davis: No snaps on offense Sunday
by RotoWire Staff | RotoWire

Davis did not play a snap on offense in Sunday's loss to the Redskins, Rob Demovsky of ESPN.com reports.

Davis played a season-high 36 snaps in Week 8, but with fellow receiver Geronimo Allison added to the mix that week and Ty Montgomery moving back into more of a role at the receiver position, Davis has played just 10 snaps in the three games since. With both Allison and Montgomery ahead of him on the depth chart, as well as four other players, it's unlikely he will make an impact on the offensive side of the ball anytime soon.

Henry posted:

Problem with that is MM is the offense. 

I have no doubt with a little retooling to the talent on the field they are back in it.  Problem is MM isn't going to be the guy to do it. 

http://www.packers.com/news-an...20-b023-a6cb3d84bf77

Entering the final stretch of his 11th year as Packers head coach, McCarthy has fashioned one of the most consistently prolific offensive attacks in both franchise and NFL history.

If current projections hold, the Packersโ€™ offense is on pace to finish inside the top 10 in both total offense and scoring for the 10th time in McCarthyโ€™s 10 seasons as the teamโ€™s primary playcaller, and for the ninth time in passing yards.

McCarthyโ€™s teams have registered a plus-97 turnover margin in his 11 seasons, second only to New England (plus-135) and more than twice that of third-place Atlanta (plus-44) over that span. Only nine other NFL teams are in the black in takeaways since 2006.
 
There are some cool graphics in the article and you can play around with the different categories. The one that really stands out is the turnover margin difference between MM's Packers and Holmgrens' Packers.
 
CD Angeli once penned an article about the Culture of Carelessness with Favre throwing picks and Ahman Green putting the ball on the ground way too often.

BrainDed posted:

Rodgers finding his accuracy again goes a long way in making MM look like a savant.   

I give him credit for not losing the team.  A lesser leader would have had a mutiny on his hands.   That said, the warts are still there.  Loyal to a fault with assistants and maybe in player development, game / clock mgt and stoopid face syndrome. 

As a Mc game management detractor, I'll throw him a bone and say that at least he tried to hand off the duties and it was even worse!

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×