Skip to main content

Ho-lee-balls the TEs in this class. Kid from Miami looks good. There's even a 6'4" whitey out of Iowa than ran a 4.52 40. Is this the year Ted finally lands the dominant white TE? 

Only two TEs over 6'5" have ever put up 20 plus on bench press, 30 plus vertical, sub 4.55 40, 10' plus broad jump. OJ Howard and Jared Cook. 

CB is still deeper but this draft has some really good TEs. 

Last edited by ChilliJon

As good as Howard is going to be. He's probably long gone at 29. And even if he isn't. There will be a crap load of defensive players with equal grades just sitting there. Ted should get an impact starter on D whether he goes CB or edge rusher. 

This is not a good year to need OL in the draft. All the more reason to try and get something done with TJ. 

You never know, but my guess would be no. Ted likes to catch underrated guys who haven't hit their ceiling yet in round 1. Kenny Clark is the perfect example, he has tremendous physical skills but hadn't fully developed yet because he was only like 20 when they drafted him. I'm not saying McCaffrey has hit his ceiling, but he was used so much in college that I think what you see is what you're getting. Aside from that we already have a versatile scatback type in Monty and Cobb, if they look at a RB I would think it would be more of a bigger downhill runner like Lacy or Starks. 

BrainDed posted:

Good. Leave those CB's and pass rushers on the board.    I'm fine with Lacy, Monty, UDFA and Rip holding done the backfield.   

Yeah, I can't figure this out.  I can see drafting one RB 3rd or 4th round but it's not a bad backfield at this point.  

TT really needs a win on defense.  I think he finally did with Kenny Clark.  If he can add one more difference maker it would go a long ways to patching up the D.

Ted does not like to use draft picks on sub 5-11 DBs.  Ted has drafted 13 defensive backs in the last 11 drafts and only 1 of those 13 measured in at under 5-11.  That happened to be Randall who missed the mark by only 1/8th of an inch and so far has not lived up to his draft status.

In the late first round area, the cornerback that probably has the best natural cover skills is LSU's TreDavious White.  Most websites had listed him at 5-11 and LSU's website listed him at 6-0 this year but he had been listed at 5-11 last year.  I didn't think he'd make 5-11 at the combine but he measured in at 5-11 on the nose and now figures to be very much in the mix for the Packer's first round pick.

The following are cornerbacks grading in the first five rounds that did not make the 5-11 mark.  I'd be surprised if Thompson drafted any of these players.

Desmond King/Iowa = 5-10

Adoree' Jackson/Southern California = 5-10

Jourdan Lewis/Michigan = 5-10

Damontae Kazee/San Diego State = 5-10

William Likely/Maryland = 5-6 5/8 (will be drafted as return specialist)

Very surprising that there were 22 cornerbacks worth a pick in the first five rounds and 17 of them are 5-11+.  Very deep pool for Thompson to pick from.

If Thompson trades down it won't be because value isn't there, it will be because there is so much top-flight talent there that he figures he can get similar quality at a later pick.

For example, if Thompson wants to go cornerback first it wouldn't be surprising if he has as many as 8 cornerbacks graded as first round picks provided 7 of them work out as expected and Tankersley runs better than expected (sub 4.55).  The 8 would be Lattimore/Ohio State, Tabor/Florida, Jones/Washington, Humphrey/Alabama, White/LSU, Conley/Ohio State, Wilson/Florida, Tankersley/Clemson.

All the word out of the combine is that Watt does figure to be a late first round pick.  Charles Harris, listed at 235 pounds, weighed in at 253 and just ran the 40 in pretty respectable times in the low 4.8's.  Thompson may exclude Carl Lawson based on his height (6-1 3/4), but he was an early round two candidate and was just credited with running one of his 40's at 4.68 at 261 pounds.  Obviously Takkarist McKinley figures heavily in this area, although Thompson may exclude him medically.  All that being said, we'll have to wait until all these players run the short shuttle and 3-cone because Thompson seems to value those numbers more than any other when it comes to evaluating defensive front seven players.  But as I type this, it appears that there are least 4 outside linebacker candidates that look like really solid picks at #29.

I am really liking the way this draft shapes up for Green Bay.  Only real problem area is if Lang and Tretter both leave, getting a quality guard (or tackle projected to play guard) outside of the first 45 picks looks to be a problem.  Also a later round inside linebacker could be hard to find but that's a secondary concern.  But CB, OLB, RB, TE...looks like pretty good quality to me.

FLPACKER posted:
IL_Pack_Fan posted:

There looks to be about 8 TEs in this class that would instantly become the most athletic at the position for GB if drafted.

There are not 8 TEs more athletic than Cook

Ok, fine. His aggregated combine results would have made him the 7th most athletic TE in this class by SPARQ. That of course assumes A) he re-signs and B) he hasn't lost a step in 8 years.

https://www.playerprofiler.com/nfl/jared-cook/

https://3sigmaathlete.com/rankings/te/

(Sorry, can't embed links on phone.)

Underwear Olympics far from the be all end all, but I'd love to see another athlete paired with Cook and ready to hold down the spot in the future. 

Last edited by IL_Pack_Fan

Jordan Willis/DE/Kansas State (would play OLB in Green Bay) probably raised his stock more than any other player today.  Was thought of as a try-hard guy with a good motor but he posted some pretty incredible workout numbers.

6-3 3/4

255 pounds

4.53 in the 40 (best time among DLmen, only player in LB group that did better was Jabrill Peppers and he will be a safety)

averaged 1.56 in the 10-yard time

39 inch vertical

10'5" board jump

4.28 short shuttle (3rd best among DLmen)

6.85 3-cone (best among DLmen, waiting on LB times)

33 tackles for loss and 21 sacks over the last two seasons.

A third rounder heading in, now looking like a possible first rounder.

Last edited by PackerJoe

I think TT goes pass rusher in the first round.  Those guys killed it as a group today, so no doubt at least 1 first round rated guy will be there at 29.  Even if Perry comes back, CMIII may never be the guy we saw 3+ years ago and after those two, cupboard is bare.  

I also wouldn't mind Ross, McCaffrey or Cook at 29 either, since any of those would add game breaking speed to the offense (which is lacking right now).  Sounding like McCaffrey goes earlier but with Cook's disappointing combine, maybe he drops.  Ross could go earlier too, he was late first/early second before he ran a 4.22, so probably goes in the teens now.  

OL is very weak this year so really hope either Lang or Tretter comes back.  Not sure Barclay, Spriggs or Murphy are ready to start at guard.  

I see this year as a good year to trade down. A lot of good players will drop to end of first and beginning of the second round. If Ted is so inclined he can get both BPA and needs addressed in the 2nd to 5th rounds.

Due to the lower perceived value pure guards  (not converted tackles) can be found 4th and 5th rounds. Lindsay was a pure center and he worked out well enough for center.

Patrick (no relation) is reported to have good potential as guard and is already on the PS.

Cook's issue isn't HIS character, it's apparently the character of his crew. He needs to get that under control and learn to separate himself from those that are damaging his reputation. If they're sold on his character though I wouldn't hesitate to take him, he's a feature back who could contribute day 1. 

Yeah Jordan Willis is a guy I wouldn't be surprised to see us take in round 1. Film is there and just like Watt the question was about how he stacked up athletically. Really solid numbers. 

Goalline posted:
DH13 posted:
ChilliJon posted:

OJ Howard. 6'6". 251lbs. 4.51 40. Those numbers make no sense. 

Unless your names are Usain and Bolt.  But seriously, a long strider who can get his stride rate fast enough to pull a 4.5 is very rare.

What were his 10 yard splits?

 Don't think he lasts until the Packers pick, but he's going to be a major TE weapon for someone. 

There is just a great big old bunch of speed and depth and talent in this draft at LB and DB. It's genuine silliness how much athletic talent there is at those two positions.

I don't agree with the early love crush on Willis given his combine numbers. It happens every year. The game tape screams 3rd round. A cone drill convinces everyone to move up a few rounds. Given how much filthy nasty speedy playmakers are going to be sitting at 29 he damned well better not be the guy. If he's there in round three? Have at it. A crazy combine showing should push a guy slightly up your board. Never a few rounds. 

That LB and DB happen to be two areas that GB needs to become better and faster at is such a wonderful thing. Ted may not pick THE perfect guy in round 1 and 2 but he should be able to add talent, depth, and speed. 

ChilliJon posted:

There is just a great big old bunch of speed and depth and talent in this draft at LB and DB. It's genuine silliness how much athletic talent there is at those two positions.

That LB and DB happen to be two areas that GB needs to become better and faster at is such a wonderful thing. Ted may not pick THE perfect guy in round 1 and 2 but he should be able to add talent, depth, and speed. 

I'm of the belief that the best GM's/personnel guys are always looking 2-3 years out and draft / sign FAs accordingly. Having this class line up with GBs needs may not be that serendipitous.

I generally agree with that but for the fact that I doubt he was looking 2-3 years out 2-3 years ago and planned on taking multiple high round DB's 2 years in a row.  But he may not be.  If 1265 has full faith in R&R we may not see another DB taken high this year.  Plenty of other spots for the first 3 rounds to shore up with talent.  They probably need a solid FA vet at DB than another rook.

Packdog posted:

Jordan Willis against a good O-Line - Stanford

Looks pretty ordinary here.

I actually think he looks pretty impressive here, aggressive and assignment sure. He's going back and forth between rushing from a wide 9 and a defending the run from 4/5 tech End spot. He gets the better of that RT 4 times by my count, the one time Stanford did NOT throw a quick pass he forced a fumble. He keeps his outside contain pretty consistently against off=tackle runs and keeps his eyes on the pitch man against the option forcing the early pitch. 

Last edited by Grave Digger
DH13 posted:

I generally agree with that but for the fact that I doubt he was looking 2-3 years out 2-3 years ago and planned on taking multiple high round DB's 2 years in a row.  But he may not be.  If 1265 has full faith in R&R we may not see another DB taken high this year.  Plenty of other spots for the first 3 rounds to shore up with talent.  They probably need a solid FA vet at DB than another rook.

Agreed, and I was referring more to the LB position. No way Thompson would know the 2016 would be the last of Shield's career.

Hungry5 posted:
ChilliJon posted:

There is just a great big old bunch of speed and depth and talent in this draft at LB and DB. It's genuine silliness how much athletic talent there is at those two positions.

That LB and DB happen to be two areas that GB needs to become better and faster at is such a wonderful thing. Ted may not pick THE perfect guy in round 1 and 2 but he should be able to add talent, depth, and speed. 

I'm of the belief that the best GM's/personnel guys are always looking 2-3 years out and draft / sign FAs accordingly. Having this class line up with GBs needs may not be that serendipitous.

You have got to be ****ting me...

If that was the case, you're suggesting that TT knew 2 to 3 years ago when he let CB's walk and drafted our current crop that there would be good replacements for his failures in this draft.    

Riiiiiiight.  Sounds like a winning strategy. 

I don't know about 2-3 years out, but Ted is definitely always thinking about the next year when he drafts/signs FAs. He's looking at his where the salaries are going, whose contracts are up, etc. On more than 1 occasion he's drafted WRs when we're mostly stocked at the position. He drafted Fackrell last year when we were 4 deep with pass rushers, why? Peppers and Perry are FAs, Clay is over 30 with a big salary, etc. He's not alone in that, Belichick dumped Chandler Jones and Jaime Collins when, realistically, those players would have made major contributions to this team the same year. The best GMs are playing for the now and the next year and down the road, that's why Ted doesn't go hog wild in FA, gotta protect the team long term.

Herschel posted:

Ouch, Teez Tabor and Marquez White ran brutal 4.63 and 4.68 40s, respectively. Obviously this is in shorts and not backpedaling but those are not good times. 

In some drafts Tabor would probably still have a chance to be a late first round pick but with the strength at CB this year he's very much a long-shot to be a round one pick now.  He'll have to rebound big-time at Florida's Pro Day to work himself back into round one.  Could end up being a steal because the guy can play.  Quincy Wilson wasn't great in the 40 but his short shuttle time was very good.  He could still be in the running for round one but doesn't appear to be in that top tier of cornerbacks.  Tankersley was the opposite, way better than expected in the 40 but his short shuttle was only average.  Probably a borderline first rounder.  I expected slightly better numbers from Sidney Jones.  Nothing bad when looking across the board but nothing that would really sell me on the idea that he should be a top 20 pick.  He's probably still in round one.  Was disappointing that Lattimore and Humphrey did not do the agility drills but the 40 time, vertical leap and broad jump put these guy solidly in the top 20.  All of Conley's numbers were excellent and he could have very well jumped from #7 to #3 on the cornerback board.  Tre'Davious White, a bit disappointing like Sidney Jones, White's probably in round two.

As far as the lower tiered guys heading in, both Colorado CB's and Washington Kevin King's had pretty impressive days.  King's numbers were better than Sidney Jones and not too many people expected that.  UCLA's Fabian Moreau was pretty great across the board.  If there was a player who could make that huge jump up the board it was him.  He was thought of as a first rounder two years ago and messed up his foot which knocked him way down.  Looks like he is all the way back from that, I sure don't see him making it out of the top 50 now and he's back to first round consideration like he was a couple years ago.

Right now I'd guess Lattimore, Humphrey and Conley will be off the board at #29.  One or two more could come off the board before #29 but the next best list that Ted could be looking at would be Sidney Jones, Cordrea Tankersley, Quincy Wilson, Tre'Davious White and Fabian Moreau.  Considering Jones and Moreau are in Sam Seale territory, smart money would be on one of those two.

If the NFL loves the short shuttle and 3-cone times then T.J. Watt will not make it to the #29 pick.

6.79 3-cone

4.13 short shuttle

As of now there are 25 3-cone times posted for the DEFENSIVE BACK group, and if Watt's 3-cone time is stuck in there it would rank 7th.

As of now there are 30 short shuttle times posted for the DEFENSIVE BACK group, and if Watt's short shuttle time is stuck in there it would be tied for 7th.

NFL mock draft 3.0

29. Green Bay Packers β€” Tre'Davious White, CB, LSU: One reason QB Aaron Rodgers had to be so good down the stretch last year was because he had to compensate for a secondary that was scalded pretty much on a weekly basis, with most of the blame lying with the corners.

Edit: Not familiar with the guy but based on what I've read (soft and really a slot player) I'd pass.

Last edited by michiganjoe

It's a weak draft for good OL and it appears to a decent draft for outside pass rushers and DL.  

That tells me that if I'm TT I make a strong effort to resign Lang and Tretter and I probably let Nick Perry and Peppers walk. 

Ted loves taking DL early although if it were me I'd look at a TJ Watt or a corner in round 1 and then look OLB in round 2.   

The issue is Watt graded out very well athletically and I'm not sure he's there now at 29 and before anyone calls me a UW homer CMIII and Watt had almost identical numbers with the pre-draft drills despite Watt being 2 inches taller and 12 pounds heavier.  I think TJ may have moved himself into the 20-25 range with his workouts.  

 

The Packers met with the following players at the combine:

Seth Russell/QB/Baylor

Dalvin Cook/RB/Florida State

D'Onta Foreman/RB/Texas

Corey Clement/RB/Wisconsin

Ryan Ramczyk/OT/Wisconsin

T.J. Watt/OLB/Wisconsin

Zach Cunningham/ILB/Vanderbilt (maybe OLB, but with GB I'd project him inside)

Marlon Humphrey/CB/Alabama

Clement was quoted as saying a Packer scout told him that Green Bay could draft two running backs.

And before anybody gets too excited about this list, last year there were about the same number of player meetings that were confirmed and the Packers didn't draft a single one of those players (Kolby Listenbee, Chris Jones, Su'a Cravens, Jaylon Smith, Reggie Ragland, etc).

PackerJoe posted:

The Packers met with the following players at the combine:

Seth Russell/QB/Baylor

Dalvin Cook/RB/Florida State

D'Onta Foreman/RB/Texas

Corey Clement/RB/Wisconsin

Ryan Ramczyk/OT/Wisconsin

T.J. Watt/OLB/Wisconsin

Zach Cunningham/ILB/Vanderbilt (maybe OLB, but with GB I'd project him inside)

Marlon Humphrey/CB/Alabama

Clement was quoted as saying a Packer scout told him that Green Bay could draft two running backs.

And before anybody gets too excited about this list, last year there were about the same number of player meetings that were confirmed and the Packers didn't draft a single one of those players (Kolby Listenbee, Chris Jones, Su'a Cravens, Jaylon Smith, Reggie Ragland, etc).

We spend a lot of time during the season criticizing the organization for not thinking outside of the box, not participating in free agency, draft/develope philosophies, etc.

Yet now I look at that list and think the best outcome is if we got all three Badgers in the draft.

So much for out-of-the-box thinking on my part.  In Ted we trust.

ChilliJon posted:

I think Reddick was second round coming out of the senior bowl. Then he graded out well at the combine. Some mocks now have him going anywhere between 18-26 which seems like natural combine over reaction. I do think he is going first round though. 

I'd be interested to see how the NFL careers pan out of those who climb the chart at the combine.... I'll bet its a lot of disappointment.... game film has to be more reliable....

YATittle posted:
ChilliJon posted:

I think Reddick was second round coming out of the senior bowl. Then he graded out well at the combine. Some mocks now have him going anywhere between 18-26 which seems like natural combine over reaction. I do think he is going first round though. 

I'd be interested to see how the NFL careers pan out of those who climb the chart at the combine.... I'll bet its a lot of disappointment.... game film has to be more reliable....

It depends on what you mean by climb. A guy like Reddick is too small to play DE in the pros because he's isn't flat-out more athletic than the guys he'll line up across from and just beat them up field. He was in college so that's where they put him. So the Senior Bowl is his chance to show he's coachable and can play other positions and the combine is where he can show he's athletic enough to make the switch. 

I admit there's part of me that would love to see him in Green Bay where the Wizarding World of Wallabee Hairpieces could play with he and Matthews moving around the formation, wreaking havok. In "base" he'd line up inside but in (sub?/most) packages he could line up in many spots. 

The upside of Reddick is how he moved easily from ILB to OLB in drills at the senior bowl. And he's better in coverage. Reddick is a chess piece you can move around with Clay. Agreed that Reddick is probably too light to play OLB as a full time edge/rush guy. If GB is looking for a FT OLB/edge guy then TJ Watt or Jordan Willis would be fine selections. 

Last edited by ChilliJon

If the Packers took Reddick they very likely put him inside.  Most of the talk is CB and OLB but one of the Journal-Sentinel writers (thought it was Silverstein but can't find the link) listed three primary needs for Green Bay: CB, OLB and ILB and then secondary needs like RB and OG (can't remember all the secondary need positions).  If Thompson sees it the same way then Reddick could very well be the best player available and 29 and Ted could cross everybody up and take the ILB when this is the first year in the last half dozen where most people don't seem to think ILB is a primary need.

The one thing that makes me think Reddick is an impossibility is that it would be like Ted giving up on Martinez, and since Martinez probably was the best rookie in training camp last year I can see Thompson being perfectly content to project him as a starter in 2017 even though he was brutally bad at the end of last year.

Last time I mocked out a first round I had Reddick going to the Dolphins at #22 and he did nothing at the combine to make me think he'd slide down much further than that.

 

100% agree Patrick. Depth is going to be hit hard to start the season. Daniels, Clark, Lowry, and Ringo are the only 4 we have for the first 4 games. I expect them to add at least 1 DL in the draft before Round 5 and possibly an FA DL. Jonathan Hankins or Sylvester Williams might not be bad pickups, they will command more reasonable money unlike guys like Poe or Brandon Williams. 

Last edited by Grave Digger

They'll likely add Price to the 53 for depth. They signed him to a futures in December so he's in their plans. Take a look at the DL FA list at the end of March. Draft someone in round 5 with the comp pick. Maybe an UDFA. 

Really talking about replacing snaps here and not so much productivity. 37 total tackles in 16 between Guion and Pennel. Substantial snap count though. 

It's a bad year for 3-4 NT in the draft.  D.J. Jones of Ole' Miss and Stevie Tu'kolovatu of Southern Cal are about the only two that project at playing that position.  Then there are some players like Caleb Brantley/Florida, Jarron Jones/Notre Dame, Elijah Qualls/Washington, Carlos Watkins/Clemson that could play nose tackle but would probably be better at other positions.  Then there are some later-round, try-hard guys that aren't great fits for NT but probably could make it work because they are workers and would give it everything they have.  Michigan's Ryan Glasgow might be the best example of that.  There are probably only about 7 worth drafting.  Tu'kolovatu was pretty mediocre at the combine and knowing Thompson's love for athletes on defense I'd think he's a long-shot to be picked by Green Bay.  Caleb Brantley would only be available with the Packer's first rounder and it's pretty unlikely that would happen, so cross him off the list for now.  Jarron Jones probably is best at 5-technique and Watkins really shoud be a 3-technique...putting those guys on the nose really wouldn't be a good fit for their talents.  Qualls would be the most logical fit of that bunch.  May be able to cut the good, realistic options down to D.J. Jones, Elijah Qualls and Ryan Glasgow.  And again, Glasgow would be a really undersized guy that could only make it work because of effort.  Worth noting that Glasgow would be a later round guy and posted a 4.50 short shuttle and 7.55 3-cone time which are really good numbers, but him holding up at NT over a long haul would be really questionable.  He didn't play NT at Michigan (Matt Godin was their NT), so he'd be a projection that would be counted on to share snaps and not have to carry the full load.

Grave Digger posted:

I don't think they look for that classic run stuffing NT like Casey Hampton. They seem to want more 3-tech's who can slide down to NT when they actually play a base 34 (which isn't often). Guys who can play the run and don't have to come off the field on passing downs.

yes, in reality we played a 2-4 significantly more than a 3-4 

Walter Football's updated prospect visit list (COM= Combine, SR= Senior Bowl, EW= East/West Shrine Game):



  • Dalvin Cook, RB, Florida State (COM)
  • Julie'n Davenport, OT, Bucknell (SR)
  • Marlon Humphrey, CB, Alabama (COM)
  • Aaron Jones, RB, Texas-El Paso (COM)
  • Jonathan McLaughlin, OT, Virginia Tech (EW)
  • Fabian Moreau, CB, UCLA (EW)
  • T.J. Watt, 3-4OLB/OLB/ILB, Wisconsin (COM)
  • Joseph Williams, RB, Utah (EW)


I'm surprised they met with Dalvin Cook, I wonder if they were doing due diligence because there's the potential he could drop?

"Cook's inate ability to catch the ball is one aspect of his game that might separate him from other backs. Longtime wide receivers coach Jerry Sullivan, who recently retired after 25 years in the NFL, told Omnisport that Cook reminds him of Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell.

"The guy’s got the whole package," Sullivan, who was most recently with the Jaguars from 2012-16, said of Cook. "He’s a great receiver out of the backfield, smart, instinctive. If you put him outside, he can catch"

The Bell comparison is accurate. Total package at RB who's three year career at FSU stands up. Like Bell you can't pretend he doesn't have character issues that might come back and bite you. Risk is probably worth the reward because he's going to produce in the NFL. I'd love to see him in GB. I just don't see him lasting past the 15th pick. 

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×