Skip to main content

GreenNgoldBlood posted:

With #12's clock ticking, this is NOT the time to bring in many new bodies. This is the time to draft a few immediate, impact players. If the Packers use all 12 picks, or anywhere close to it, then I will know they still don't "get it". They don't need 12 new bodies...get 5 or 6 high impact guys and call it a day. use all those picks to manuever up as much as possible.

Yeah, because youโ€™re guaranteed to hit on those 5 picks.  If a guy is reasonably in reach a trade makes sense.  Throwing away half your picks because you think a handful of guys are a sure thing is idiotic. Go figure. 

Grave Digger posted: I donโ€™t think Vander Esch is the right guy to pair with Martinez, Iโ€™m sure he will end up being a fine LB though. Theyโ€™re too similar in terms of what they bring to the defense, we need a missile like Rahsaan Evans to pair with Mart, who (like LVE) is an inside grinder. 

Fitzpatrick or trade down unless thereโ€™s an unlikely event like a top player like Ward, Nelson, or Chubb falls. 

I don't think they'd see Vander Esch as an ILB though, unless he's the Matthews heir and he's moving all around the formation. He's tailor-made to play on the outside in a 3-4.  

I also think Evans could play outside also, but think he's better inside. I really like Oren Burks to pair with Martinez in the 3rd or 4th round.

Herschel posted:

I don't think they'd see Vander Esch as an ILB though, unless he's the Matthews heir and he's moving all around the formation. He's tailor-made to play on the outside in a 3-4.  

I also think Evans could play outside also, but think he's better inside. I really like Oren Burks to pair with Martinez in the 3rd or 4th round.

But then you're getting into a project again, converting LVE to an OLB in odd fronts or off the ball SLB in even fronts (since Pettine won't label the scheme, I'm guessing it will be hybrid). LVE hasn't been a full time pass rusher, mostly rushing the QB from ILB and even then only totaling 5 sacks in 3 years. He's a complete unknown in that type of role.   

Hungry5 posted:

I think there are only 5 or 6 can't miss difference makers, than a whole lot of really good contributor types who can excel in the right situation. That is why I want more 2nd or 3rd round picks.

I'm guessing it would have to be a scenario where a team wants to double dip in the first round.  As you say, considering the depth of the contributor types not sure who would pull the trigger on a trade.  I guess there are still a good share of twitchy GMs out there.

I hate the draft!

When we picked Nick Collins, Jordy Nelson, Davonte Adams I said, "who the hell is that guy"  I'll even admit that I was not that high on Mathews.  I was, "meh" on AR.  I was excited about AJ Hawk.  

I have no idea who will turn out and who won't.  The only thing that I'm relatively sure about is that the best way to get a blue chip player is to pick the best player available in the first round.  Drafting for need in the early rounds seems to produce less than BPA.

I also hate that even though I hate the draft, I'll be checking my phone/tv to find out who we get.

Nevermind, I'm post call and really don't know my head from a$$hole currently.

The one time I was 100% sure that the Packers had massively screwed up a pick is when they traded away two picks to move up into the third round to draft BJ Sander, which almost all the experts had as someone who was an UDFA. I think a lot of us thought that as it happened.

One other time I thought that the Packers had massively screwed up was when they traded away a first round pick of the Falcons second round pick the previous year. I remember thinking "what is this new GM doing." That was the Favre trade.

The draft is fun to watch because for every Rich Campbell and BJ Sanders there is a Donald Driver, Aaron Rodgers, Mike Daniels.

MichiganPacker posted:

The one time I was 100% sure that the Packers had massively screwed up a pick is when they traded away two picks to move up into the third round to draft BJ Sander, which almost all the experts had as someone who was an UDFA. I think a lot of us thought that as it happened.

One other time I thought that the Packers had massively screwed up was when they traded away a first round pick of the Falcons second round pick the previous year. I remember thinking "what is this new GM doing." That was the Favre trade.

The draft is fun to watch because for every Rich Campbell and BJ Sanders there is a Donald Driver, Aaron Rodgers, Mike Daniels.

As a Packers fan who had seen many screwed up Packers drafts in my life I was honestly really mad when Wolf traded their first round pick for the 3rd string Falcons QB.  At the time I was thinking "well thats the same old Packers doing something stupid in the 1st round"  and I also thought they have Magic why did they do that?  

MichiganPacker posted:

The one time I was 100% sure that the Packers had massively screwed up a pick is when they traded away two picks to move up into the third round to draft BJ Sander, which almost all the experts had as someone who was an UDFA. I think a lot of us thought that as it happened.

One other time I thought that the Packers had massively screwed up was when they traded away a first round pick of the Falcons second round pick the previous year. I remember thinking "what is this new GM doing." That was the Favre trade.

The draft is fun to watch because for every Rich Campbell and BJ Sanders there is a Donald Driver, Aaron Rodgers, Mike Daniels.

Itโ€™s more fun when we get the Drivers and Rodgersโ€™ and the Vikings choose the Williamsโ€™ and Erasmus Jamesโ€™ of the draft.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×