@SteveLuke posted:Rodgers to SF makes so much sense.
ARod returns "home" to make a SB run with the first top defense he's had in over a decade;
Gutey opens it up for his QB to take over;
The Pack's salary cap concerns over the next couple of years disappear; and
The Pack loads up on premium draft picks (and maybe a player or 2) so that they can continue to be "competitive" and regularly win the NFC North.
Now, that management can paint Rodgers as the villian, Gutey should get er done to ensure the Packer management dream of another decade of NFC North competitiveness.
Those NFC North Champions banners really mean a lot. What does it say when teams are spending ridiculous amounts of draft capital to try to find a QB that can win a Super Bowl and the Packers appear to be doing everything they can to get rid of an MVP QB and hand the reigns over to an unproven guy. If Love turns out to be good, they'll look like geniuses. If Love busts, the entire front office is gone in 3 years.
If there is a trade, it's not happening until June.
Packers will trade Aaron Rodgers eventually. Just not this year.
@Tschmack posted:I say this not because Iâm down on Rodgers or high on Love, but the Packers are more than 1-2 players away IMO. This team wonât beat a healthy TB or KC team.
Dude we were 1-2 PLAYS away last year, and we have the same team this year. I seriously can't believe people think we don't have a SB capable team right now. We just need our star players to play like it and not shit the bed like they did in the NFFC game. That includes Rodgers.
The one thing I know for certain, and itâs right here on this board now, is that Rusty is a slacker and Pâboi is covering for him.
@Tschmack posted:Itâs fun to banter about it, but considering what LA gave up to get Matt Stafford- who is probably 2/3 the QB that Rodgers is - it would take multiple 1sts (including #3 overall) and multiple players likely to include Warner, McGlinchy, Deebo Samuel, and maybe another key guy to make it work.
So letâs say that is the proposal- #3 overall, their next 2 #1s and those 3 players would you do it? #3 overall would have a lot of value to someone wanting a QB. You could flip that for more picks and players.
I say this not because Iâm down on Rodgers or high on Love, but the Packers are more than 1-2 players away IMO. This team wonât beat a healthy TB or KC team.
Three firsts, Warner, Samuel and McGlinchey? I'd take that in a heartbeat.
Rodgers stayed healthy and had his best year. They didnât retain Linsley. Corner and backup corner is still a mess as is DL. Bak is still out for probably half the season.
So yes, I am concerned that they wonât be as good even with Rodgers.
TB is running everyone back and KC addressed most of their issues in the offseason.
So yes, the Packers are clearly 3rd behind both of those teams and maybe the Rams as well.
I won't be convinced of that until I see them play.
I wouldn't be at all surprised to see Tampa take Harris or Etienne with #32.
What are the odds that Tampa Bay takes a QB at 32 tonight in order to start preparing to replace their soon to be 44-year old QB?
SF gave up a ransom to move up to 3rd. If the plan was Rodgers weâve had heard about it a month ago.
Im down with Elijah Moore tonight. But ROK should be the pick.
ROK = Round One Kicker?
Cleveland is LOUD.
Zach Wilson low-fives half the crowd and then makes out with Goodell.... Then he stands 6' away from interviewer just to be safe. Jesus fuck.
Goodell looks more like Barney Rubble every year.
Fucking team hats look like 1950's gas station signs.
45 minutes to draft 3 qbs, the Packers won't pick before 5 am
How come these kids dress like car parking valets?
Great chance Pitts ends up being the best pick of this entire draft.
@Blair Kiel posted:How come these kids dress like car parking valets?
The double dip because they have a work ethic. Unlike some here.
I'm unemployed.
I own it.
At least I direct-posted about Rusty, damn.