Skip to main content

I guess that it has been brought up before but if a quality player is injured before the draft and drops down the order, then is it worth it to choose him over other men who are camp ready? It seems that if the team has a β€œwin now” philosophy then they pass but a smart GM would snatch up that player and consider it a bargain.

If you are talking about a guy like Ojabo and his torn Achilles, I'd pass, if you are in win now mode.

I'm not sure win-now excludes some of these injured players if they have a speedy recovery.  The point isn't really being ready for TC and winning in the regular season - though that would improve their ability to contribute later.  I think the current team can get to the playoffs as is.  The impact really needs to come in the playoffs.  The real question should be "is this injured player going to be ready to contribute by January?".  That could depend on the position they play and how much practice time they can get in before then but I'm not sure I'd pass on a blue chip talent if he can contribute by the end of the season.  Easier for a EDGE or IDL, tougher for a WR.

Last edited by DH13
@mrtundra posted:

If you are talking about a guy like Ojabo and his torn Achilles, I'd pass, if you are in win now mode.

TT seemed to prefer the long term approach. Gute, not so much. For TT it was build through the draft first and keep the team competitive. As an older fan I have seen the β€œwin now” approach fail for many teams. And even when it works then years of rebuilding often follows. Rookie years are not often productive anyway. Would it not make more sense to get the BPA for the long term success of a team? I am on the fence and willing to listen to the arguments for both sides.

@mrtundra posted:

I can see Gute going WR with both # 22 and #28. Especially now that both Davante and ESB are gone and with MVS's situation unresolved, yet. Then going IDL and O Line with #53 and #59.

I don’t. It seems the Packers’ philosophy has been to look at picks to avoid direct β€œvalue” comparisons, including trading the Favre Jets pick so no player would be β€œthis is who we got for Favre”. It blew up in the Vikings’ face when they selected Williamson with the Moss pick too.

Plus the first round receivers thing.

Last edited by Herschel

Per Kiper's latest, Drake London and Chris Olave will be long gone by the time the Packers pick at 22. He has London going 4th overall to NYJ, Garrett Wilson 8th to ATL and Olave going 16th to PHI. Has Pats taking Jameson Williams at 21, but he is at least a year away since he tore his ACL in January.

Kiper has us taking Texas A&M OG Kenyon Green who many have compared to Elgton Jenkins. He then has us taking Arkansas WR Treylon Burks at #28. Burks has fallen because of a poor 40 in the combine. If he is the only choice at 28, Packers may pull the trigger on NDSU's Christian Watson who is way more athletic than Burks, although played at a much smaller school.

@Packmeister posted:

It's hard to say...there's always some surprises, and also some real head-scratchers, too. I like Kiper, just to hear him rattle off everybody's names and stats, and what-not, but he's not always rarely right after the first 5-10 picks.

One other thing, too...every team has a different board, and player ratings can vary widely from one team to another.

FIFY

@michiganjoe posted:

Gutey getting a good look at Olave.

go watch wilson and don't discount a move UP to get him, this guys is ridiculous too.  very natural catcher and smooth, not olave route running but he's smoov.

@Floridarob posted:

I am liking the Pickens kid from Ga. Big, fast and athletic. I l also like the Burks kid from Arkansas. Burks supposedly had a bad 40 but I never saw anyone catch him.  he reminds me most of Deebo.

There have been many successful WR’s with not so great 40 times.  It’s game speed that you look for.  Trust what you see on game day and on tape.  Production, baby!

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×