Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Goldie posted:
Move along! Move along!
Nothing to see here.
Positives:
Tretter didn't have any bad snaps.
Schum had at least one good punt.
Negatives:
Offense
Defense
Special Teams
Coaching
They lost, and liked like sh!t doing it.
Positives: Not sure
Negatives: You could throw a dart and hit someone on the offense, defense, ST's and coaches that deserve some criticism. Maybe a vendor or two also.
The lack of someone with a chloroform soaked rag ready to prevent MM from deferring won coin tosses. It was kind of consequential in the last 2 losses.
+
HHCD Really good game until he whiffed at the worst possible time. A relatively small positive and the only one.
-
Everything. Poor play in all three phases and Colts looked like they had more energy and wanted it more. Inexcusable and goes right to MM.
Neg or pos, 3 winnable road games coming up. We shall see what the team is made of.
This is what a MM / TT team looks like without elite QB play. Time to dislodge from the sack folks.
+++
Monty had a few nice runs
Clinton Dix with a couple of picks
Schum looked OK
Badgers and Bucks basketball
----
Too many to ****ing list starting first with this ****ty coaching staff
Next game up but the way Tennessee runs the ball they might have 200 on the ground
If I could pick one word for this team. It's stagnant. There is no flow to this team. Nothing is moving in any direction. I mean 4-4.
I realize this is a bull**** generalization but it seems like everyone is kind of sick of everyone and even sicker of answering questions about everyone else. Stagnant.
Positives.
+ A couple young guys looked good. Ryan taking a jump, Dix making impact plays and Adams starting to look like a NFL caliber WR.
Negatives
- Rodgers back to beyond bad QB play. Staring down his guy and not reading the D.
- Special teams cost us 13 points. TD return for 7, long return for 3 and missed FG for 3.
- Defense has no heart two weeks in a row. Can't make a play when it matters most.
- Pass rush. Colts can't pass protect for ****. Our front 4 couldn't get home. What happened to Perry, he was having a great year.
Neg....this SB favorite never lead the woebegone Colts at Lambeau....
Twenty-five continuous years of a HOF QB behind center and they'll probably only have 2 SB wins to show. Wow. 
The drops and missed throws early jacked with any chance of a rhythm.
PackLandVA posted:Twenty-five continuous years of a HOF QB behind center and they'll probably only have 2 SB wins to show. Wow.
Muns man is not in yet...
PackLandVA posted:Twenty-five continuous years of a HOF QB behind center and they'll probably only have 2 SB wins to show. Wow.
Neither QB wins their SB without the team around them.
The "standard" offense continues to look predictable, stale, and overmatched by NFL teams that continue to adjust to things that work. They don't have WRs that can consistently just "get open" and "beat their man". Sometimes the do, but not anything close to consistently. Haven't for the last 2 seasons, yet they simply tell the WRs to beat their man. When they play in a spread formation they at times have more success. But, they use it sparingly until in desperation mode. Manbeaters are not and apparently will not be a philosophy that Mike McCarthy buys into. Not Pennsylvania enough, I imagine.
The defense has moments. They've played the run well enough. But, they continue to be exposed by NFL teams that aren't content to just do the same things over and over. Again, the middle is exploited by a defender while they do nothing whatsoever to combat this. The Pass rush was anemic against an OL that has been a sieve all year.
The special teams gave up points, and again, was exposed by opposing coaches that scout their opponents and adjust what they do to take advantage of that instead of sticking to the same things they've always done.
This team is 8-10 in their last 18 games. This is what they are. This isn't a Super Bowl contender going through a rough patch. This isn't Miami/Washington 2 game stretch in 2010. This isn't a team that will turn it on once they get healthy. They don't have a 6-0 start to cushion them this year.
Maybe something clicks and they go 6-2 down the stretch. Continuing with status quo doesn't make that seem all the likely, but I'm often wrong, and will be again.
Hungry5 posted:PackLandVA posted:Twenty-five continuous years of a HOF QB behind center and they'll probably only have 2 SB wins to show. Wow.
Neither QB wins their SB without the team around them.
..and you just witnessed what a MM/TT team looks like without elite QB play. Did you like what you saw?
GB loses by 17 without Rodgers today.
ChilliJon posted:GB loses by 17 without Rodgers today.
Preposterous.....with or without Dick they lose by 5.
Hungry5 posted:PackLandVA posted:Twenty-five continuous years of a HOF QB behind center and they'll probably only have 2 SB wins to show. Wow.
Neither QB wins their SB without the team around them.
My statement is not an indictment of either QB. The teams 'built" around them should've been capable of winning more than one each IMO. There's plenty of blame to go around.
+ We aren't the Browns
- Browns might beat them
Neg:
Mason Crosby and his Kick-offs = 14 pts
Blake looked lost
Pos:
HCD
Jake Ryan is a keeper
Pikes Peak posted:ChilliJon posted:GB loses by 17 without Rodgers today.
Preposterous.....with or without Dick they lose by 5.
If you replace RichRod with a guy that could outrun the average NFL DL (or block better than a scatback), we win by 10.
BrainDed posted:This is what a MM / TT team looks like without elite QB play. Time to dislodge from the sack folks.
Amen.
Negative: The Packers got exposed as Super Bowl imposters on national TV at Lambeau against a bad and very injured Colts team.
Positive: The Packers got exposed as Super Bowl imposters on national TV at Lambeau against a bad and very injured Colts team and it is getting harder and harder to ignore the fundamental deficiencies that exist from top to bottom in the organization.
RR's new name is Jenga. It only takes a cough to topple that guy over.
- Another depressing loss from a team that should be 6-2, at worst
+ Mike McCarthy, Dom Capers and Ron Zook won't be in Green Bay much longer
Goalline posted:Positives: That squirrel was dynamite
It was secret squirrel
Attachments
Images (1)
Richard Rodgers has the elusiveness and balance of Bubba Franks, the speed of Ed West and the blocking abilities of Jeff Janis.
Plus
Hmm...I don't agonize over the Packers losses anymore...maybe I am getting stale just like the Mike McCarthy Packers.
I am stalling cuz no positives come to mind
Minus
Stale Offense: It was like Indy knew some of the Packers plays
Unprepared and unready: MM is on the hot seat and should be
Defense
Janis looks like a goof with a perfect TD pass bouncing off his face mask
S/Ts looking worse and worse
Three road games in a row now
Third place...but we are ahead of the Bears
HHCD was so inconsistent today. He made some big plays but was blown out of the tackling lane on the opening kickoff then failed to tackle Luck with the game on the line.
Goalline posted:Positives: That squirrel was dynamite
That was one of my 2 positives. The squirrel made me laugh and so did Jeff Janis' pathetic attempt at catching a perfect deep pass from Rodgers that bounced off his facemask and will probably make a bloopers reel. 2 lighter moments in a sea of crap.
Janis watching a TD bounce off his chin was comical.
I have to give credit to the Colts. With three minutes left, McStupidface would have run two dives and a sweep for negative 1 yards. Colts went for the jugular and threw killer passes (granted, they were to the middle of our defense, so, it was a pretty safe play). 4-4, time to stop being stupid and start kicking ass.
Dom Capers sucks
