Skip to main content

Compare 1996 to 2015

 

1996

Brett Favre coming off MVP season

Dorsey Levens an established running back

Lost Robert Brooks for the season

Signed an electric return man Desmond Howard

Play Vikings week 17

 

2015

Aaron Rodgers coming off an MVP season

Eddie Lacy is an established NFL running back

Lost Jordy Nelson for the season

Signed an electric return man in Ty Montgomery

Play Vikings in week 17

 

R-E-L-A-X

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I think you got the cart a bit in front of the horse with this one:

Signed an electric return man in Ty Montgomery

hope so, ain't really seen it yet, but opportunities are slim in the kicking games these days.

Originally Posted by Tdog:

I think you got the cart a bit in front of the horse with this one:

Signed an electric return man in Ty Montgomery

hope so, ain't really seen it yet, but opportunities are slim in the kicking games these days.

Dude runs sideways way too much.

Dorsey Levens wasn't the "feature" back until 1997. Edgar Bennett was still the starter, Levens came on later in the season and was productive in the playoffs.

Bennett had 899 yards rushing coming off a 1000 yard season the year before. Levens had 566 yards.
Originally Posted by Dr._Bob:

I still remember Levens' leaping catch in the corner of the endzone that was a sign of good things to come.  Sorry, that's as specific as I can get.

Don't know if this is the game you are referring to, but Levens had a very nice TD reception in the NFC Championship game against Carolina.

 

Levens did come on strong as the season progressed and I thought by the playoffs was outperforming Bennett.

I like it Hungry5, and I tend to agree. We ought to be better than last year, that's for sure. Raji is back at NT, Gaston is showing really well there too. DEs have Daniels returning with better talent behind Guion and Jones in Pennel/Ringo/Boyd - we'll get a good group out of these guys, at least better than last season. OLBs seem improved. ILB talent is younger, faster. Secondary filled with ball hawks. Jam packed! Safeties with more experience, and man, can they range.

 

If our O can pick it up after losing Jordy, and everyone stays relatively healthy, this could still be a very special season. I have confidence in Adams and Montgomery to take the reins at WR along with Cobb. Running game is improved. With our #1 OL in tact, this gets pretty exciting.

 

Now, if only McCarthy's involvement in our STs pays off...

What I liked about TT's comment/opinion is that he gave one. This is about as far as we've ever read/heard/seen him go in praising a player/position/group... often when asked about what he is seeing he comments with stuff like: "we like our guys"; "we have a chance"; "ah, ya, sure"; "quite frankly".

 

 

 

Following H5's tweet, I'm wondering if MM is re-thinking the overall game plan...

 

This isn't rocket science...

 

Before Jordy going down, I think it's fair to say, that, once again the O puts up 30 points and the D needs to keep it under that.  Now, I don't think the O can put up that consistently, so now the D has to pick up the slack.  If we have a top 10 D, which is possible, then the O, doesn't need to be perfect, and we should still be in the hunt?    

 

 

How does the information of the quantum state of particles falling into a black hole reemerge in the outgoing radiation? This is the question that the black hole information paradox poses.

 

The answer, we propose, is that the information is stored in a super translation of the horizon that the ingoing particles caused. It means that each generator is shifted an independent amount and that encodes the information. In other words, the ingoing particles determine a super translation of the horizon. This in turn, will determine varying delays in the emission of wave packets. The information about ingoing particles, is returned, but in a chaotic and useless form.

 

You can watch my technical talk in which I summarize the idea. With Professor Malcolm Perry presenting full detail later that day.

Originally Posted by El-Ka-Bong:

 The information about ingoing particles, is returned, but in a chaotic and useless form.

 

I've been saying this for years; but nobody listens to an old man yelling at particles:

 

"Get out of my SP2 Orbitals you ungrateful biscuit eating sons of bitches !  

Originally Posted by MEl-Ka-Bong:

With Professor Malcolm Perry presenting full detail later that day.

Just what this site needs. Another Perry making a late arrival. 

 

Did anyone know Malcolm Perry was one of the doctors that attempted to save John F Kennedy's life at Parkland Hospital? Performed a tracheotomy on the President. 

 

Pretty cool huh? 

 

I'm going to shut up now. 

Last edited by ChilliJon
Originally Posted by Satori:
Originally Posted by El-Ka-Bong:

 The information about ingoing particles, is returned, but in a chaotic and useless form.

 

I've been saying this for years; but nobody listens to an old man yelling at particles:

 

"Get out of my SP2 Orbitals you ungrateful biscuit eating sons of bitches !  

I imagine this is roughly the same process that happens when a player leaves the Packers and joins the Vikings.

Originally Posted by MEl-Ka-Bong:

How does the information of the quantum state of particles falling into a black hole reemerge in the outgoing radiation? This is the question that the black hole information paradox poses.

 

The answer, we propose, is that the information is stored in a super translation of the horizon that the ingoing particles caused. It means that each generator is shifted an independent amount and that encodes the information. In other words, the ingoing particles determine a super translation of the horizon. This in turn, will determine varying delays in the emission of wave packets. The information about ingoing particles, is returned, but in a chaotic and useless form. 

 

The exact moment you die is like a celestial tweeter distorting in a waxed paper pond.

Originally Posted by MEl-Ka-Bong:

How does the information of the quantum state of particles falling into a black hole reemerge in the outgoing radiation? This is the question that the black hole information paradox poses.

 

The answer, we propose, is that the information is stored in a super translation of the horizon that the ingoing particles caused. It means that each generator is shifted an independent amount and that encodes the information. In other words, the ingoing particles determine a super translation of the horizon. This in turn, will determine varying delays in the emission of wave packets. The information about ingoing particles, is returned, but in a chaotic and useless form.

 

You can watch my technical talk in which I summarize the idea. With Professor Malcolm Perry presenting full detail later that day.

 

Packers win the penant!  Packers win the penant!

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×