Skip to main content

The only thing the NFL cares about is eyes on the tube. And the only matchups that are going to change that number are the teams from the 3 large population centers- NY/LA/Chicago, each with millions who would only watch if the local team were in it. As all are eliminated, the cash producing numbers- the ratings- will  be the same 100 million people who always watch as fans of football, spectacle or gambling.

The fact of the matter is the Bucs are a good team.   They should present a decent challenge to the Packers.  

But if the Packers get physical (like they did against the Rams) and donโ€™t turn the ball over multiple times they should win.  The Saints shit the bed and gave up 21 easy points due directly to the Brees INTs and the Cook fumble.   No different than the first time the Packers and Bucs played.  The Rodgers pick 6 changed the game.

I think Mike Evans goes all Aaron Donald, due to the great coverage on him, by Jaire Alexander. Jaire has the guy whining all game long, because of Jaire's excellent coverage. Brady throws a couple of INTs to our Safeties, because of great coverage by our CBs and the pressure from our D Line. TBB scores late, in the game, but it's not enough to beat the Packers. Packers win 31-29.

Last edited by mrtundra
@mrtundra posted:

I think Mike Evans goes all Aaron Donald, due to the great coverage on him, by Jaire Alexander. Jaire has the guy whining all game long, because of Jaire's excellent coverage. Brady throws a couple of INTs to our Safeties, because of great coverage by our CBs and the pressure from our D Line. TBB scores late, in the game, but it's not enough to beat the Packers. Packers win 31-29.

If weโ€™re daydreaming, why daydream a 2 point win?

@ilcuqui posted:

Packers need to figure out a way to run the ball. If that happens everything else will fall in place.

Agree. Was interesting to see how much the Saints stuck to the run...although when you you see how much Brees arm strength has eroded, it makes sense. It's sad to watch him at this point.

Tampa is far an away the best run defense in the league. That said, the Pack has faced 6 of the top 7 run defenses this season...and faired pretty well.

Tampa has an amazing array of weapons and their defense can play hard and fast. Their biggest problem is that they've been inconsistent. Beat the mighty Packers by 28 , but lose to the Bears

@ilcuqui posted:

Packers need to figure out a way to run the ball. If that happens everything else will fall in place.

Looked to me like the Saints were running the ball just fine. Kamara was 18/85. A 4.7 clip. Hell even Ty Montgomery got 4 carries for 14 yards. They didn't have Murray yesterday.

Very seldom do you win a playoff game when your QB throws 3 INT's & 1 very nearly a pick-6.

The Bucs win because their defense is opportunistic & gets takeaways. If the Packers play their game with 0 turnovers, the Bucs have ZERO chance of winning.

Linsley will be dealing more with Suh but I'd sure love to see Jenkins knock the snot out of him.

Williams needs to keep running like a beast like he did against the Rams.  That alone will have a huge impact for Jones staying fresh and opening up the offense.

You just gotta love the guy.  I hope the Packers are able to keep him around as well.  Both he and Jones are a huge positive in the locker room as well.

Last edited by Henry
@Packdog posted:

Selective memory then. It was in most game threads , I recall cause I was a Jamaal fan from the beginning. "why are they giving Williams so many carries" , "we need a better #2 back" "Williams is too slow".

You or me?  I'm pretty sure asking why Jones, who I think we agree is better than Williams, is merely fans pontificating on plays.

I sure the hell didn't see anyone "bagging" on Williams.  He isn't Jones, plain and simple.  He's a nice change of pace back that pairs well with Jones.  I don't think that qualifies as a "great majority bagging on Williams".

Last edited by Henry
@Henry posted:

You or me?  I'm pretty sure asking why Jones, who I think we agree is better than Williams, is merely fans pontificating on plays.

  I meant me. Just remember defending Williams during game threads ... plenty of  "why are they giving Williams so many carries" , "we need a better #2 back" "Williams is too slow",

Maybe some of that was true, but most importantly, he and the coaches have made himself better. He's become a solid back and is tough as nails.

@Packdog posted:

  I meant me. Just remember defending Williams during game threads ... plenty of  "why are they giving Williams so many carries" , "we need a better #2 back" "Williams is too slow",

Maybe some of that was true, but most importantly, he and the coaches have made himself better. He's become a solid back and is tough as nails.

Ah, well I don't agree with those sentiments either.  He's a perfectly solid back and he produces.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×