Add Reaction
ðŊâĪïļððððĪððđððâïļððŧððŋðĒðĪŠðĪĢâ
ððĪ·ðĨðððĪŊOriginal Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Originally posted by TD:
I can just imagine what the current crop of Kentucky Wildcats took for classes - Counting Fun with Marbles, Painting by Numbers, Making Popcorn with ease, and Leisure Bowling.
quote:Designated Beerdrinker?
quote:Eliot Wolf â @eliotwolf46
Wonderlic test is archaic & overrated. If a player has a reading comprehension issue or dyslexia, they are not given special circumstances
quote:Originally posted by The Crusher:
Claiborne is articulate in interviews.
quote:Originally posted by Rusty:quote:Eliot Wolf â @eliotwolf46
Wonderlic test is archaic & overrated. If a player has a reading comprehension issue or dyslexia, they are not given special circumstances
Interesting...pretty sure this is a violation of the ADA
quote:Originally posted by The Crusher:
Must be learning disabled. Probably dyslexic.
I used to teach learning disabled kids. Usually very bright but don't do well in standardized tests. Claiborne is articulate in interviews. Feel bad for the kid that this all over the news.
quote:Originally posted by Herschel:
..... but they're sometimes written in "tricky" ways .....
quote:Originally posted by Fandame:
Who cares about intelligence on a standard test for a football player?! If they really want to test a guy's intelligence for his new profession, base the test on football terms or rules or coverages or how many yards there are on a football field. Most professions test specifically for that profession, so why should football be any different?