I think that after the first scripted plays GB started to use some of those left over from the Chicago game. That would explain the lull in action. ;-)
We need to remember this is the second game and they are still trying to get their bearings. Not an easy task against two of the better defenses in the league.
2-0 and 2-0 in the division. Hard to really complain too much about that.
Henry posted:MichiganPacker2 posted:Henry posted:That was the least satisfying win in awhile.
No win against a division opponent is unsatisfying. That's a game that Favre used to lose 20 years ago and it's a game that MM would have lost during the last 4 years.
That's all fine and good but rightly or wrongly I'm unsatisfied after watching them gallop out front. I wanted to break their ****ing spirit.
They might have done that to themselves by watching their qb self destruct and squash any chance they had to steal this one when we couldn't put any more points on the board.
Fair point. Those INTs were fun as ****. Guaranteed money!!!
Back-to-back wins against the Bears and Vikings is a nice way to start a season.
Do we care that Aaron was hollering at LeFleur??? I’m sure it’s going to be the topic of the week, or maybe some talk of it. *shrug*
No and it shouldn't be a ****ing off week topic. The same ****ing thing happens on every ****ing sidelines for every team. Christ I'm over that tripe.
Blair Kiel posted:NedFlanders posted:Lot's of stuff to "clean up".
How about we start with premature "daggers"?
It was the Coors Light talking.
Tschmack posted:We need to remember this is the second game and they are still trying to get their bearings. Not an easy task against two of the better defenses in the league.
2-0 and 2-0 in the division. Hard to really complain too much about that.
This really is the summary of the year so far.
NFC North. 2-0
NFC: 2-0
Vs the best D's in the NFL last year 2-0
A road win, the home win... honoring Bart.
4 of the next 5 at home. As this gets figured out, any hay that's made is hay for the year.
Today had playoff implications.
Great fugging WIN!!
Henry posted:No and it shouldn't be a ****ing off week topic. The same ****ing thing happens on every ****ing sidelines for every team. Christ I'm over that tripe.
Yikes.....well ok then Henry, I hear ya......settle down. 
Goldie posted:Do we care that Aaron was hollering at LeFleur??? I’m sure it’s going to be the topic of the week, or maybe some talk of it. *shrug*
No. We don’t. Seriously. WTF is this comment.
I didn't see ARod "yelling" at MLF.
I think he was expressing some displeasure over the play call, but I've seen him bark louder than that.
Much ado about nothing.
But yes, the media desires controversy of any kind.
Even if they have to make it up.
RE: MLF and AR. So on the 3rd and 1, the reason AR was bitching at the ref was because he saw the ref place the ball at the 1st down yard marker. So Aaron is thinking they have the first. He didn't realize it's now 4th and 1. He wanted to run a quick play to make it 2nd and goal at worst. MLF wasn't ready for a quick call and so it was a miscommunication between them.
It happens. This is a new offense. It's a new regime. From post game analysis, it was nothing more then that. AR thought he got the 1st. They didn't.
The Packers are 2-0 after beating their 2 biggest rivals. Key players leave the game healthy.
WTF else do people want. As others said, much ado about nothing.
ChilliJon posted:Goldie posted:Do we care that Aaron was hollering at LeFleur??? I’m sure it’s going to be the topic of the week, or maybe some talk of it. *shrug*
No. We don’t. Seriously. WTF is this comment.
Got it off Bleacher Report....shows the video.....I can’t get it to copy to show it here. Go see it for yourself.
PackerPatrick posted:I predicted that Cook would have a lot of yards...but not THAT many yards on the ground. Wow. Tough win but well earned.
He got 75 yards on ONE run with the Viking O-Line holding (not called).
Anytime a defense holds a top RB to 19 carries on 79 yards, that's a "win"
Very satisfying win. I expected 80-3 after that 21-0 start. I was beyond disgusted with the Spermheads pulling out a game like that over the last 3-4 years.
2-0 in the League & Division. The Pack hasn't started a season like this in a LONNNNNNNG time.
****. the. Vikings!
S till
K eep
O n
L osing
Goldie posted:Do we care that Aaron was hollering at LeFleur??? I’m sure it’s going to be the topic of the week, or maybe some talk of it. *shrug*
The key to that is not pay mind to PFT or Florio. He's the only one that gives a **** about the faux soap opera in Green Bay. Let him stir it up in the midst of his purple loss. Here's to hoping the played up drama only galvanizes this Packer team. If MLF and AR figure this out, with a competent defense, they can stir the ****storm.
Goldie posted:ChilliJon posted:Goldie posted:Do we care that Aaron was hollering at LeFleur??? I’m sure it’s going to be the topic of the week, or maybe some talk of it. *shrug*
No. We don’t. Seriously. WTF is this comment.
Got it off Bleacher Report....shows the video.....I can’t get it to copy to show it here. Go see it for yourself.
Do you realize you are part of the problem. You’re giving the drug addict money. Stop being an enabler if you don’t like the behavior.
Boris posted:PackerPatrick posted:I predicted that Cook would have a lot of yards...but not THAT many yards on the ground. Wow. Tough win but well earned.
He got 75 yards on ONE run with the Viking O-Line holding (not called).
Anytime a defense holds a top RB to 19 carries on 79 yards, that's a "win"
Very satisfying win. I expected 80-3 after that 21-0 start. I was beyond disgusted with the Spermheads pulling out a game like that over the last 3-4 years.
2-0 in the League & Division. The Pack hasn't started a season like this in a LONNNNNNNG time.
****. the. Vikings!
S till
K eep
O n
L osing
Yes, 75 on one run. And Cook earned it. I doubt it happens again with anyone else.
I love the reframing of SKOL. I will remember that.
BrainDed posted:Goldie posted:ChilliJon posted:Goldie posted:Do we care that Aaron was hollering at LeFleur??? I’m sure it’s going to be the topic of the week, or maybe some talk of it. *shrug*
No. We don’t. Seriously. WTF is this comment.
Got it off Bleacher Report....shows the video.....I can’t get it to copy to show it here. Go see it for yourself.
Do you realize you are part of the problem. You’re giving the drug addict money. Stop being an enabler if you don’t like the behavior.
Please explain......I have no idea who you are talking about.....the guy who posted this topic?? Who’s a drug addict?? How am I being an enabler?? Sorry, please help me understand.