Have we really gone almost 2 months without any comments in this thread?!?!?
That's a link to Murphy's monthly Q&A column. Someone references his time in Washington and how good those teams were with adequate QBs but excellent defenses, massive O-lines and strong running game. Then Murphy is asked his thoughts on winning a SB in today's game with that formula, specifically not an elite QB.
Murphy gives an okay answer, about what would be expected from someone within the org:
"Over the years, the league has really become a quarterback-driven league. Washington won three Super Bowls with three different quarterbacks – Joe Theismann, Doug Williams, and Mark Rypien. All very good, but not Hall of Fame quarterbacks. In my mind, things were different in the 1980s and 1990s, but it is also a great tribute to Joe Gibbs. I don't think you can win a Super Bowl now without an elite quarterback. The other issue is whether you can win with an elite quarterback getting paid a full-market salary. Tom Brady has been paid less than full market throughout most of his career, and Patrick Mahomes won the Super Bowl while on a rookie contract."
Interesting he adds last two lines to his reply. I'm sure it will infuriate some, but he's probably right.