Found on the internet:
Nothing good happens on offense unless people get blocked. Ask the Chiefs. The Packers, with 3/5 of an offensive line and missing their best, Jenkins, did a better job of blocking the Eagles than the Chiefs did, even though they had the mighty Creed Humphrey and we only had the not-good-enough-weak-link Josh Myers.
Right now, the Packers have 5 guys on their roster who have shown they can play on the offensive line. They have a couple of unproven, mostly untested backups. Our season ended with one of those backups on the field.
I think that improving the line is THE priority. Four years in a row now our season has ended with backup offensive linemen on the field and us scoring 10, 16, 21, and 10 points. Different QBs, different RBs, different superduper WRs, same result. And on the horizon, Tom, Walker, and Rhyan are all entering their contract year.
So, rather than spend $25M on a WR, I'd rather get some reliable beef. If we could sign one legitimate guy as a backup (Myers?) and draft ONE guy on Day 2, we'd at least be able to go 7 deep. Maybe Glover or Monk is better next year.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
The 22-10 loss to the Eagles doesn't look as bad anymore, considering what they did to the Commies and Chiefs. The Packers played the Eagles as tough as anyone did.
The Chiefs, and Mahomes in particular just got a lesson from Mike Tyson. Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face. Patrick saw phantom punches raining down on him even when he wasn't under pressure.
While we need corners, the lines, both sides, should be the focus of the draft. Also, the Eagles showed how important mid-level free agents can be. It's not all about marquee signings.