So, a ton had been made about the Packers lack of a 100 yard rushing since week 5 of 2010. 44 regular season games! Longest active streak in the NFL. What a disaster for this offense. What sheer ineptitude! How embarrassing! My even the Jacksonville Jaguars haven't plumbed the depths of that futility.
Packers record during that 44 game regular season stretch? 33-11. Winning percentage of .750.
If you want to really look at the streak after Starks game vs Philly in the playoffs (and include the playoffs), the Packers record in all games since that WC win in the 2010 playoffs is 30-9, a winning percentage of .770.
Houston and Minnesota have been among the 2 best rushing teams over that same period of Wk 6 2010. Minnesota has had 18 games with a 100 yard rusher. Houston 24. Minnesota's record, 18-28. Houston's, 28-20.
So, other than some mythical and ceremonial round number, what was the impact of not having a 100 yard rusher exactly? Feels like this is a meaningless "stat" that is nothing more than some old school romance of hitting a round number.
Hell, if we play .750 football, I don't care if we ever see another 100 yard rusher. Plus, it will give morons like Joe Buck something to talk about...