Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

So I saw the end of Game 3 last night with the "controversial" obstruction play and a couple of things jump out to me:

 

-First, I keep hearing pundits/experts/etc. say that there doesn't need to be intent for an obstruction call to be made.  That may be true, but does anyone really believe Middlebrooks didn't raise both legs in an effort slow down the runner (Craig)???  Watching the play over and over, his actions look so unnatural other than to think his first impulse was to slow the runner down. He actually raised his legs a bit for a split send, and then raised them again.

 

-Secondly, once obstruction was called, the Craig automatically is awarded home plate.  But does the runner need to touch home plate???  I'm not so certain he ever actually touched the plate.  In slow motion, it appears that his pant leg may have touched it, but I'm not positive.  And I don't think he new he was awarded the base.  I think he thought he was called safe since he teammates came running out of the dugout..  That, and being injured on the play, he kinda just laid there on his belly for a while.

Last edited by PackLandVA

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×