****! Do they even have another CB?
Marching right down the field
C'MON D!!!!!!!
LET'S GO!!!1
crap and there goes Gunt!
Does GB have any corners left?
ugh not Gunter!
If it comes down to it and MM doesn't use his TO's, I will whine on this forum relentlessly.
Whitehead? Didn't they bring him up this week?
Don't understand why Atlanta is hurrying? They will end up leaving time for Rodgers...
Does it matter if they have another corner
add another LB and just blitz because they can't cover anyone right now
BrainDed posted:If it comes down to it and MM doesn't use his TO's, I will whine on this forum relentlessly.
And this is different from?
Need to put some pressure on Ryan. He'll throw the ball to GB
Hyde at corner?
BrainDed posted:If it comes down to it and MM doesn't use his TO's, I will whine on this forum relentlessly.
That's why we have moderators. Keep the relentless whining to a minimum, just a couple whines.
Classic Dom D right now
Get after Ryan!!!
Way too easy.
They just pulled a guy out of the crowd to play corner.
Same Capers bull****
rush 3 really
GB refuses to pressure Ryan. Don't get it. At all.
Jones maybe only a decoy now
They have no CBs, he needs to drop 11 in to coverage!
Grave Digger posted:BrainDed posted:If it comes down to it and MM doesn't use his TO's, I will whine on this forum relentlessly.
That's why we have moderators. Keep the relentless whining to a minimum, just a couple whines.
And make them classy.
ATL will run a little to burn clock now.
This is not an easy call on when to use timeouts at all. I'm not sure what the best strategy would be.
How about optimism as opposed to whiney-tool like complaints from the usual suspects?
Go Pack.
Maybe Dom is just setting them up lol
One play, 5 commercials. One play, 5 commercials.....it really gets old.
It's coming...
I really hate this prevent a win defense.
Packy posted:Jones maybe only a decoy now
Not that MM/Capers will notice
Nice D! Keep it up!
Won't be another possession D needs to win this
Tip and pick
Great coverage!
I just keep telling myself this has been a great effort no matter what.
FFS
So close Ha-ha
LETS GO D!!!!
Wasnt that 3rd?
dajim posted:I really hate this prevent a win defense.
You do know they are missing a bunch of CBs?
INT. Smell it.
Generous spot
Mohammed come to us
Sack.. Tipped pass.. Come on!
Killing them softly...
Henry posted:INT. Smell it.
I like your optimism but I wouldn't count on it unless a ball is tipped at the line.
****ing playschool pitch and catch
Dagger
We have TIME!
Wide ****ing open
Sure would be nice if we had more time.
That was an unfortunate way for the defense to end the game. Disappointing he got so wide open.
Barn burner. One good play, one good kick.
At least we have two timeouts left.
ScheiÃe!
Only guy in the whole ****ing end zone.
No pass rush whatsoever
brilliant strategy
DH13 posted:Wide ****ing open
Tough cover for Ryan there. Give Matty credit, he recognized the defensive weakness and took advantage of it.
Offense not blame...32 points should be plenty to win. F Compers.
MichiganPacker posted:DH13 posted:Wide ****ing open
Tough cover for Ryan there. Give Matty credit, he recognized the defensive weakness and took advantage of it.
My 80 year old mom recognized that weakness, and she's never watched a football game in her life.
Not. Over.
PackFoo posted:Offense not blame...32 points should be plenty to win. F Compers.
He's missing his top 3 CBs and his best player (Matthews). I've been very critical of Capers before, but you have to cut him some slack today.
PackFoo posted:Offense not blame...32 points should be plenty to win. F Compers.
You do know that we are playing without our three top DBs, as well as Clay? Can I have what you are drinking?
Hail Mary 3.0
COME ON O!!!!
Jordy - you have to catch that.
That throw was not that high.
22 is a punk ass player
Damn... better use of timeouts would've given us much more time
Way to use a TO.
What a waste of a helluva effort today. Gugh.
Brutal
crap.
That sucked.
Not even close.
Crap.
Good thing that we get 4 TOs first half next week though. Smart.
Damn.
Thanks Dom
PackerPatrick posted:Dagger
Why do you post crap like that when there was still a chance?
Tough loss, but a great game.
Losing that timeout with Nelson not getting off the field was a killer. Jordy has to make that catch and then, barring that, get off the ****ing field. If they have two timeouts you can run for a first down or run a quick play in the middle and call timeout and still have one left. If Nelson was OK to come back in for the last play, he should have been able to crawl off the field.
Sometimes you just don't have enough healthy players.
Tschmack posted:Thanks Dom
How is that Dom's fault with our 6/7 CBs playing at that point?
JFC.
Horse****
Good effort. The lack of CB's caught up with them.
Well they limited hulio
I come away thinking this Packer team, with any amount of health, can make a post-season run. I didn't think that before today.
I'm good.
Hey BK did they win the game?
Thaf was an awful way for the defense to piss it away after the O fought like hell to get the lead back
And before you post some bunk ass "posting alone" response my wife said "what are they doing on D" and "way to let Rodgers and the offense down"
Drop the microphone
Good to see the old Rodgers today.. Too bad it came with the old MM and his piss poor clock mgt.
Tschmack posted:No pass rush whatsoever
brilliant strategy
...and you.
You are fukking awful to try to watch a game with...that's why you're sitting there alone posting.
Do me a favor, don't post during Badger or Packer games.....you're a turd in the pool.
Blair Kiel posted:I come away thinking this Packer team, with any amount of health, can make a post-season run. I didn't think that before today.
I'm good.
Me too.
We have a lot of work to do, but it CAN be done.
Get healthy and let the O rip as we have seen they can.
Tschmack.
I feel so very sorry for your wife.
She hates you too?
Reminded me of the NE game in 2010. Duct tape and wood glue and they gutted it out with all they could and almost got it
Lot of kids grew up today.
Cavetoad posted:Tschmack posted:Thanks Dom
How is that Dom's fault with our 6/7 CBs playing at that point?
JFC.
And he didn't even get beat on the outside. They isolated a slot guy on a LB and made the play.
Dix and Gunther both had chances to make game ending interceptions. Both would have been good plays, but that's what needs to happen.
Nelson drops a catchable ball within long FG range.
Guys didn't make plays when they needed to. The coaches put them in position to do so
Offense only scored eight in the second half. Appears to me Quinn did a better job of adjusting than Pittsburgh Macho did.
That is a win if played in Green Bay, just one of those games with a slight advantage goes to the home team.
They also win, a lot, if Dom Capers doesn't suck.
Just had a great BLT with extra mayo
Blair Kiel posted:Tschmack.
I feel so very sorry for your wife.
She hates you too?
I think Mr. and Mrs. Tschmack share an inchoate, puffing their cheeks and holding their breath together, rage toward Dom Capers, is what he was saying.
Blair Kiel posted:I come away thinking this Packer team, with any amount of health, can make a post-season run. I didn't think that before today.
I'm good.
Tschmack posted:Thaf was an awful way for the defense to piss it away after the O fought like hell to get the lead back
And before you post some bunk ass "posting alone" response my wife said "what are they doing on D" and "way to let Rodgers and the offense down"
So, I guess you've proven that your football knowledge is matched by your wife.
We knew this was going to be a shoot out. All on the depleted defense ? You're ok with the offense scoring once in the second half ?
michiganjoe posted:Offense only scored eight in the second half. Appears to me Quinn did a better job of adjusting than Pittsburgh Macho did.
Dropped balls on 2 of the drives (Geronimo to open the half and Nelson the last drive) were big plays. Other drives ended because the OL couldn't pass protect. You expect some mistakes from a guy playing his first game (Geronimo) but not Lang/Tretter and Nelson. That's not on MM.
PackerPatrick posted:Blair Kiel posted:I come away thinking this Packer team, with any amount of health, can make a post-season run. I didn't think that before today.
I'm good.
Me three.
Great game, just needed a bit more from the defense in the end.
derps posted:Just had a great BLT with extra mayo
So you were icing BLTs.
Three losses through 7 games, all in the conference. Tie-breakers not looking good.
Blair Kiel posted:I come away thinking this Packer team, with any amount of health, can make a post-season run. I didn't think that before today.
Me too, especially if they have a 20 point lead in the 4th quarter.......
Lol my wife and I are fine
Our health is good, we have two wonderful daughters, and we love our jobs and don't worry about finances.
So yeah we suck BK and and go ahead and feel sorry for us. Says the guy always preaching and correcting others on an Internet forum.
As for the "everyone's hurt" I get that but the offense gave them the lead. With a number of guys hurt. This is on Capers. Play to your strengths which they didn't. That is frustrating but it's Capers MO.
"Our defense, comprised of one Mike Daniels, was unable to stave off Matt Ryan and an injured Julio down by the school yard."
So yeah we suck BK and and go ahead and feel sorry for us. Says the guy always preaching and correcting others on an Internet forum.
Technically, that's Henry, not BK.
You can't "blame" Capers under those circumstances. But those same circumstances are why you probably shouldn't put the game in the defenses hands if you can help it. They deferred on the kickoff. Atlanta got 3 points. The Packers got zilch in the 2nd half. As the Falcons were mounting their winning drive I was more worried about how much time would or wouldn't be left when the Packers got the ball back. I had no expectation they would stop them. 1:36 with 0 timeouts and needing a FG to win sounded more appealing than 31 seconds with 2 left. Or 0:00 with 2 timeouts left.
And I apologize in advance to those who hate hindsight b***ching. It's the nature of fans and message boards after a loss.
MichiganPacker posted:That's not on MM.
MM is ultimately responsible for the product on the field, including mental mistakes and poor execution.
Tschmack.
I appreciate your in-game passion, I really do.
But are you as negative in real life as you are in game threads?
I bet you're not.
The Packers offense scored 32. No Cobb, no Monty, no RBs.
Yet we feel the need to let the defense off the hook? I guess but that's coaching.
And yes, Packdog- my wife is probably more astute than me with football but that's OK too.
I'm just glad we can count on Compers when it matters. Had I dropped LSD this afternoon the AZ playoff game last year may have come up
Not sure I call it negative I just call it like it is. It's a game and I'm already over it BK. Looking forward to Halloween after work tomorrow with the kiddos.
Just don't know how many more chances this team will have to capture greatness and yes I think Capers is holding them back and has been for a while now.
Doesn't make him a bad guy but it's time to move on.
AR doesn't play defense.
And yes, Packdog- my wife is probably more astute than me with everything but that's OK too.
Fixed it for you.
Blair Kiel posted:Tschmack posted:No pass rush whatsoever
brilliant strategy
...and you.
You are fukking awful to try to watch a game with...that's why you're sitting there alone posting.
Do me a favor, don't post during Badger or Packer games.....you're a turd in the pool.
Shhhhhhhhh...supposed to be quiet...ïŋ―ïŋ―
Tschmack posted:
I'm just glad we can count on Compers when it matters. Had I dropped LSD this afternoon the AZ playoff game last year may have come up
You must have yesterday when you compared the Bucks and Indians being as much fun as a Badger win.
You nailed it that's exactly what I said. And I meant that in reality and context. What's not to like about all three of those outcomes?
Oh I get it you are a Cubs fan then.
Tschmack posted:Not sure I call it negative I just call it like it is. It's a game and I'm already over it BK. Looking forward to Halloween after work tomorrow with the kiddos.
Just don't know how many more chances this team will have to capture greatness and yes I think Capers is holding them back and has been for a while now.
Doesn't make him a bad guy but it's time to move on.
Dom doesn't catch tipped balls.
Players make the plays. I didn't see D calls that cost us the game. I saw season beginning deep roster backups having to play and doing pretty well.
I guess some people need to manage expectations. Going in to a game against currently the league's top pass offense with arguably the best WR tandem in the game and the defense without the top pass rusher and CBs 1, 2, 3 and then to lose CB 4 toward the end, getting out of there only giving up only 33 is surprising. It's never okay to give up 33, but some perspective on this is necessary.
Keeping that in mind the D got out-coached and out-played at times, the last TD was not a #5 CB issue...that was giving Sanu a free release against Jake Ryan. There should have been a 3-deep look with a Brice or Dix or Burnett right there in the middle to keep that from happening. Players have to also come though though... pass rush has to win, if Perry wants to get paid like a #1 then he needs to show he can be a primary pass rusher. Peppers gets paid like a king and only plays half the time so he is fresh for those situations late in the game. No excuse for him to not take over.
Love the offense though. Lane Taylor had the worst game I've seen from him, Clayborn is a tough player though. Glad to see Adams finally healthy and playing like I hoped he was capable of. Good to see some promise from Davis, Allison and Janis also.
Overall it was a strong effort, tough loss, but it's time to move on to Indy. Offense is finding its feet and that can only mean good things. Get healthy and get to work!
I just so wish Gunter had caught that ball. It's there, man. It's right there.
You didn't see a conservative defense on that final drive? I DVRd the game and watched it again just to be sure I wasn't hallucinating.
They brought 4 guys on every play except 2 plays when they brought 3. Not one blitz that I saw and Ryan picked them apart.
That was the infamous Compers bend-then-break defense. He saves it for special occasions. Doesn't matter if the defense is healthy or not. It works regardless.
Blair Kiel posted:I come away thinking this Packer team, with any amount of health, can make a post-season run. I didn't think that before today.
I'm good.
I feel that way as well. That said, it hurt to play as well as they did for 55 minutes and have 5 minutes of crap at the end ruin a great effort by a very shorthanded team.
You can only blitz if you have faith the back end can cover. If you blitz with shotty coverage then you either get home and sack the QB or you get burned badly. At least with dropping 6 or 7 you know you're not getting burned deep. You rely on one of your pass rushers to get home, maybe force Ryan to hold it too long for a coverage sack if you only rush 3. What it comes down to is that GB hadn't been pressuring Ryan consistently the entire game, so you have to play conservatively and rely on dropping more in coverage. Maybe if you had Matthews, Gunter and Rollins or Randall or Shields you can take chances, but a depleted D with Goodson and Hawkins starting young have to give them help.
You're right, rushing more was not an option for Dom.
Neither was covering the middle of the field.
Or holdong a lead late in a game.
Not an option for Dom
Grave Digger posted:You can only blitz if you have faith the back end can cover. If you blitz with shotty coverage then you either get home and sack the QB or you get burned badly. At least with dropping 6 or 7 you know you're not getting burned deep. You rely on one of your pass rushers to get home, maybe force Ryan to hold it too long for a coverage sack if you only rush 3. What it comes down to is that GB hadn't been pressuring Ryan consistently the entire game, so you have to play conservatively and rely on dropping more in coverage. Maybe if you had Matthews, Gunter and Rollins or Randall or Shields you can take chances, but a depleted D with Goodson and Hawkins starting young have to give them help.
I could not DISAGREE more with this post if I tried.
You blitz in the final 4 minutes precisely because you have NO FAITH in your 4, 5, & 6 CBs holding a good passing attack on 4 consecutive downs.
And yes you blitz exactly because you either get home or get burned badly. If outcome 1 occurs, your D may steal a win. If outcome 2 occurs, your are down 1 point with Aaron Rodgers and a very hot O needing only a FG to win the game.
The one thing that could not happen was to allow Ryan to throw quick, basically uncontested short routes and bleed the clock out. This is of course exactly what transpired.
Rely on one of your pass rushers to get home? When Ryan was throwing short play after play? When as you state "GB hadn't been pressuring Ryan consistently the entire game?" Not bloody likely.
You know you're not getting burned deep? Exactly. You're allowing Atlanta to burn clock and depriving your best player an opportunity to win the game.
I just could not disagree any more with this purported "logic" if I tried.
All that said, this bend, bend, bend and pray you don't break has certainly been the way Dom has coached for years, so I can understand why a loyal fan would defend it.
Should have just rushed 11, gotta be aggressive.
So your solution is give them a better chance to score because Rodgers might also score? Great call Holmgren, how does that strategy work. Blitzing hadn't worked to that point and allowing Julio, Sanu, or the deep threat guy (who had already burned Goodson 1 on 1) to have a 1 on 1 with any of our guys is exactly what Ryan wanted. That's a disastrous mismatch because at least 1 guy has no help over the top. Keep the O in front of you and make them work down the field. Shannahan schemed well to get Sanu open, pass rush just needed to win 1 on 1's.
Blitzing hadn't worked to that point because they didn't blitz, not because blitzing didn't work.
Maybe they would have lost by 4 if they had found a way to pressure Ryan
Grave Digger posted:Should have just rushed 11, gotta be aggressive.
So your solution is give them a better chance to score because Rodgers might also score? Great call Holmgren, how does that strategy work. Blitzing hadn't worked to that point and allowing Julio, Sanu, or the deep threat guy (who had already burned Goodson 1 on 1) to have a 1 on 1 with any of our guys is exactly what Ryan wanted. That's a disastrous mismatch because at least 1 guy has no help over the top. Keep the O in front of you and make them work down the field. Shannahan schemed well to get Sanu open, pass rush just needed to win 1 on 1's.
The Pack had not blitzed much all day prior to the final drive so the excuse that "Blitzing hadn't work to that point" is pure post-game support the coaching staff without reservation alternative reality.
Play it conservative? All that did was make sure the Falcons used up clock while matriculating the ball down the field while preventing ARod from having a legitimate shot to win the game.
Rely upon a "pass rush [that] just needed to win 1 on 1's?"
Seriously, are you the same poster who insisted above that "GB hadn't been pressuring Ryan consistently the entire game" and don't those 2 statements expose the fallacy of Dom's approach and those who are so tirelessly defending it?
#Packers ILB Jake Ryan said Mohamed Sanu was not his responsibility on game-winning TD. "Maybe just some miscommunication error," he said.
â Ryan Wood (@ByRyanWood) October 31, 2016
Grave Digger posted:Should have just rushed 11, gotta be aggressive.
So your solution is give them a better chance to score because Rodgers might also score? Great call Holmgren, how does that strategy work. Blitzing hadn't worked to that point and allowing Julio, Sanu, or the deep threat guy (who had already burned Goodson 1 on 1) to have a 1 on 1 with any of our guys is exactly what Ryan wanted. That's a disastrous mismatch because at least 1 guy has no help over the top. Keep the O in front of you and make them work down the field. Shannahan schemed well to get Sanu open, pass rush just needed to win 1 on 1's.
Will this man ever get tired of straw man arguments? I doubt it.
You know what happens if you blitz late in the game and get burned....the exact same thing that happened anyhow...except you give your offense more time to win the game.
This is not hindsight. It was obvious that Atlanta was going to score (sorry...it was) especially after they got to the 30 so quickly. Why not send the kitchen sink....worse case scenerio you give the offense a couple more seconds.
Jake Ryan is never responsible for the middle of the field.
No one is.
Once again I have hurt Brainded's feelings. Shocker.
Maybe you're right JAPF. I guess I don't mind playing conservative and keeping the O in front of you in this situation. If we had a full complement of players I would agree with being more aggressive, but I think if you had opened it up then they would hit a bomb and milked the clock like they did. Instead of 1 long bomb and milking the clock they worked the clock down methodically going down the field. It's a tough situation regardless of the tact you take.
It was just so reminiscent of the Arizona playoff game. Banged up offense fights like heck to put them in a position to win and the defense craps the bed. Yes they had injuries too but I don't get the "keep it in front of them" strategy unless you have 15 seconds left in the game which they did not. Just as maddening was not using the 2 timeouts but whatever.
almost like a pattern with the defense
Maybe we get healthy enough to make a playoff run like we did 2010/2011, if we make the playoffs. Dream big!
I see McGinn wrote something about Rodgers not delivering. only saw the headline, didn't read it.
Very familiar game yesterday, Rodgers and the offense get the lead late only to have the D fail. Certainly the D was under manned, but Capers and staff have to better know the limits of their players and do more to put them in position to succeed.
If GB is missing a S or CB, it's Dom's nature to go pure conservative vanilla. So with his top 3 CB's on the bench it's no surprise he decided to rush 3-4 and try and keep everything in front of the secondary.
GB really needed a big play out of Ha Ha or Morgan yesterday. Ha Ha almost made one.
The McGinn piece was utterly ridiculous. He's suggesting Rodgers failed to deliver (once again) in the clutch but must have missed that 75 yard TD drive with 3 minutes remaining.
So Rodgers didn't drive them 40 yards with 30 seconds left - for what would have been a long FG attempt. Yeah that's totally on him.
I think the strategy would have changed a little also if they had 2 TO's instead of 1. It's no one's fault that they had use the TO due to Nelson's injury, but I think it truly is what killed the drive. They had to keep going for big chunks of yardage along the sideline instead of trying to hit a big play over the middle, call TO, then be in a better position to make another play over the middle to get in FG range.
Carbon copy of the 2010 regular season game in Atlanta. AR hits Jordy for a 10yd TD with 1:06 left. ST gives up a 40 yard kick return AND a facemask putting ATL on GB 49. 20 yards and 40 seconds later ATL hits the game winning FG. Defense has played that scene out many times.
At the start of the third quarter yesterday the sideline reporter said MM told her "we need to run the ball in the second half" and I swear my eye started twitching. Those two third quarter possessions were where this game was lost. Going to 11's and getting nothing done. Even 3 points on either of those drives and it's likely a different outcome.
Grave Digger posted:Once again I have hurt Brainded's feelings. Shocker.
Maybe you're right JAPF. I guess I don't mind playing conservative and keeping the O in front of you in this situation.
You and BrainDed take it to Blair Kiel's suite at the Holiday Inn Express, why don't you?
And the prevent defense only prevents you from winning.
Per Rob Demovsky, Packers WR Ty Montgomery said the symptoms that kept him out were related to sickle cell trait. He said doctors told him it isn't career threatening and he even hopes to play this week against the Colts.
Hopefully, back soon.
Hungry5 posted:I see McGinn wrote something about Rodgers not delivering. only saw the headline, didn't read it.
Grave Digger posted:I think the strategy would have changed a little also if they had 2 TO's instead of 1. It's no one's fault that they had use the TO due to Nelson's injury, but I think it truly is what killed the drive. They had to keep going for big chunks of yardage along the sideline instead of trying to hit a big play over the middle, call TO, then be in a better position to make another play over the middle to get in FG range.
For one, Nelson should have caught the ball.
Did Nelson play on third down snap? I wasn't sure if he sat out a play or they used the timeout to allow him to come back into the game on the next play. If Nelson wasn't there, they were running a 2 minute drill with one guy (Adams) that had ever played any number of meaningful snaps in Green Bay prior to yesterday.
ChilliJon posted:Carbon copy of the 2010 regular season game in Atlanta. AR hits Jordy for a 10yd TD with 1:06 left. ST gives up a 40 yard kick return AND a facemask putting ATL on GB 49. 20 yards and 40 seconds later ATL hits the game winning FG. Defense has played that scene out many times.
At the start of the third quarter yesterday the sideline reporter said MM told her "we need to run the ball in the second half" and I swear my eye started twitching. Those two third quarter possessions were where this game was lost. Going to 11's and getting nothing done. Even 3 points on either of those drives and it's likely a different outcome.
Does anyone know if Atlanta changed their personnel to start the second half? There are some personnel groupings that you almost have to try to run the other team out of. I don't know if they did, but it might affect the criticism of MM for trying to run the ball.
Also, the play-calling wasn't exactly run-heavy and, if guys executed, worked well. The first drive included a 12 yard run by Ripkowski. What killed it was a drop by Allison and the middle of the OL getting trashed on a 3rd and six at the Atlanta 47. The second drive also ended on a sack by Clayborn. You could criticize MM for personnel I guess, but personnel groupings don't affect a dropped pass and two bad pass protection sets by the middle of your line.
Also, the failure to down the ball inside the 10 on the punt was another problem.
Green Bay Packers at 15:00
5-M.Bosher kicks 65 yards from ATL 35 to end zone, Touchback.
1-10-GB 25 (15:00) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short middle to 87-J.Nelson (23-R.Alford).
2-10-GB 25 (14:54) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers scrambles left end to GB 33 for 8 yards (91-C.Upshaw).
3-2-GB 33 (14:05) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass short left to 17-D.Adams to GB 37 for 4 yards (34-B.Poole).
1-10-GB 37 (13:24) (Shotgun) 22-A.Ripkowski right tackle to GB 49 for 12 yards (59-D.Campbell, 97-G.Jarrett).
1-10-GB 49 (12:37) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short left to 81-G.Allison.
2-10-GB 49 (12:31) 12-A.Rodgers pass short right to 17-D.Adams to ATL 47 for 4 yards (22-K.Neal).
Timeout #1 by GB at 11:43.
3-6-ATL 47 (11:43) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers sacked at GB 45 for -8 yards (99-A.Clayborn).
4-14-GB 45 (11:11) 10-J.Schum punts 55 yards to end zone, Center-61-B.Goode, Touchback
Green Bay Packers at 03:31
5-M.Bosher kicks 65 yards from ATL 35 to end zone, Touchback.
1-10-GB 25 (3:31) 12-A.Rodgers pass short right to 17-D.Adams to GB 32 for 7 yards (23-R.Alford).
2-3-GB 32 (2:52) 30-K.Davis left guard to GB 32 for no gain (99-A.Clayborn).
3-3-GB 32 (2:07) 12-A.Rodgers pass short middle to 17-D.Adams to GB 46 for 14 yards (21-D.Trufant).
1-10-GB 46 (1:39) (No Huddle) 34-D.Jackson right end ran ob at GB 45 for -1 yards (45-D.Jones).
2-11-GB 45 (:57) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass short left to 17-D.Adams to GB 43 for -2 yards (34-B.Poole).
3-13-GB 43 (:12) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers sacked at GB 35 for -8 yards (99-A.Clayborn).
Tschmack posted:The McGinn piece was utterly ridiculous.
What's up with him lately ? Does he have a personal issue with Rodgers or is he going Skip Bayless to garner more clicks ??!! Seems like he's gone crabby old man or turned into Tabloid Bob.
To say Rodgers is to blame, having been given 31 seconds to move into scoring position, is a stretch. Maybe pick on the half time adjustments, poor clock management, defensive finish, or the injuries, etc....all would have been a more reasonable landing spot.