Skip to main content

Henry posted:
bdplant posted:

Did they have any competent receivers on the field during the four wins without 17, or were those four wins all luck?

McVincePlant joins the conversation.  Maybe you should keep up and take in the entire conversation.  I said it isn't sustainable and anyone who says different is fooling themselves. 

Go have a bowl of Piss Cocoa Puffs with your snivel crew.

Lol. Vintage Henry...somebody disagrees with him and he resorts to name calling. 

I followed the entire conversation. You’re wrong!

bdplant posted:
Henry posted:
bdplant posted:

Did they have any competent receivers on the field during the four wins without 17, or were those four wins all luck?

McVincePlant joins the conversation.  Maybe you should keep up and take in the entire conversation.  I said it isn't sustainable and anyone who says different is fooling themselves. 

Go have a bowl of Piss Cocoa Puffs with your snivel crew.

Lol. Vintage Henry...somebody disagrees with him and he resorts to name calling. 

I followed the entire conversation. You’re wrong!

So everyone is saying, "Damn, why isn't GMo getting more action?"

You missed my edit McVincePlant.  Who were the major factors in the Packers offensive when Adams was out?  MVS?  GMo?  Even Lazard?

Dolt.

Oh yeah, get over yourself.  Didn't get to bitch enough?  Complete failure not to beat this team by 4 scores?  The turnovers weren't real?  Eat up McVincePlant.

Last edited by Henry
PackerHawk posted:

Man, has there been a bigger underachieving team than the Eagles this year? Might be a tie with them and the Cowboys. 

They were winning 28-14 and now it's 34-28. 

They need to be knocked out. They sneak into playoffs they will be an issue for everyone.

bdplant posted:
Henry posted:
artis posted:
Henry posted:
artis posted:
Henry posted: 

So what accounts Jones getting nowhere in the run or the short outs being completely ineffective? 

Again, I don't disagree with scaling back on Jones in the pass game but the WRB position came out of necessity.  Just like Lazard telling Rodgers what routes he can run Adams and WRB position is going to get sniffed out. 

Simple fact, you can't manufacture a complete offense with 8 competent offensive players.

You're right. Defenses have adjusted to that. My issue is since 17 had come back, when AR feels heat more often than not it's a blind prayer 17's way. Idk if it's Rodgers or MLF but prior to Adams coming back there was a bit of continuity with getting more ppl involved. Like I said, the offense looked at its best in the 2-3 weeks before Adams' return. I believed they could be scary good considering how they were finding their groove while he was out. The line is an ongoing issue. Rodger's at his age really should understand that being on schedule with down and distance will serve to protect him more, yet he can't help but get into 3rd and longs consistently. It hurts the whole team.

I'm not saying you're wrong but you've just pegged the two best players on offense as the problem.  The math doesn't add up. 

And I'm not saying you're wrong. But I'm pegging one guy. Not Adams. 12 to 17 is a great combo. But we've seen 2 cases now that to compete with solid teams requires getting everyone involved in the offense. When AR locks in on Davante is when the offense consistently stalls. I just think to compete in Dec/Jan we need all hands on deck instead of crossing our fingers for the Adams big play/PI call. A balanced attack can only help a 35 yr old vet who wants a shot at a ring. He's not helping his own cause with tunnel vision stagnance.

My personal summary:  I'll completely agree with you if/when another competent/consistent WR is on the field.

Did they have any competent receivers on the field during the four wins without 17, or were those four wins all luck?

Lazard!

artis posted:
PackerHawk posted:

Man, has there been a bigger underachieving team than the Eagles this year? Might be a tie with them and the Cowboys. 

They were winning 28-14 and now it's 34-28. 

They need to be knocked out. They sneak into playoffs they will be an issue for everyone.

I don't buy it. They might knock out someone in the WC round but that's about it. The only team that can keep them out is the Cowboys and they could very well lose 2-3 more games including the Eagles. 

Henry posted:
 
Oh yeah, get over yourself.  Didn't get to bitch enough?  Complete failure not to beat this team by 4 scores?  The turnovers weren't real?  Eat up McVincePlant.

Nope. Very happy with today’s win....sorry if that doesn’t fit into your whole “snivel” narrative.  But by all means, keep it coming with your entertaining nicknames. We’re all anxiously awaiting your next creation!

YATittle posted:

Lazard!

Yeah, let me know how long Lazard telling Rodgers which sandlot route he can run will hold up. 

Shit, Rodgers holding the ball, sandlot, downfield passes.  Pretty sure peoples heads would fucking explode around here.

PackerHawk posted:
artis posted:
PackerHawk posted:

Man, has there been a bigger underachieving team than the Eagles this year? Might be a tie with them and the Cowboys. 

They were winning 28-14 and now it's 34-28. 

They need to be knocked out. They sneak into playoffs they will be an issue for everyone.

I don't buy it. They might knock out someone in the WC round but that's about it. The only team that can keep them out is the Cowboys and they could very well lose 2-3 more games including the Eagles. 

They have not been a good team. But they're just hanging around and hanging around. It's unfortunate that the only team that can keep them out is Dallas. I think it would be unanimous that the other 5 teams that get in would rather it be DAL and not PHI.

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×