@Goldie posted:or a crushing as I like to hope for.
Your boyfriend McCarthy is getting a crushing. 
Would much rather see Martin than Summers out there.
So you win the challenge but it's first down anyway. Worth it?
@Henry posted:So if Jones wasn't so good in the passing game I'd feel comfortable going with Williams. Hopefully Dillon develops a bit more. A very good conundrum to have, Jones is worth the money because he truly is a dual threat. Not just the receiving out of the backfield either.
It's whether putting about 35 million dollars into Bakh and Jones is better than putting that money towards 4 or 5 other "good" pieces.
@PackerHawk posted:So you win the challenge but it's first down anyway. Worth it?
Not to lose a challenge for 10 yards, no. It's still first and 10 at the 35 instead of the 25.
@Iowacheese posted:Catch no doubt. Wasted challenge
Any stock tips?
So here's the spot where the refs have been instructed to call a bunch of bullshit against the Pack to help the Texans (clearly inferior team) get back in this game.
@Henry posted:So if Jones wasn't so good in the passing game I'd feel comfortable going with Williams. Hopefully Dillon develops a bit more. A very good conundrum to have, Jones is worth the money because he truly is a dual threat. Not just the receiving out of the backfield either.
??? Williams has neither the vision, burst or hands of Jones. He's a pretty pedestrian back.
@Boris posted:So here's the spot where the refs have been instructed to call a bunch of bullshit against the Pack to help the Texans (clearly inferior team) get back in this game.
Right on schedule
@Boris posted:So here's the spot where the refs have been instructed to call a bunch of bullshit against the Pack to help the Texans (clearly inferior team) get back in this game.
Instructions radioed in from the grassy knoll.
Packers run defense has been pretty good today.
Keep calling those plays Texans
@PackerPatrick posted:Summers looks slow
That's because he is slow.
Bleah. I wanted a game where I wouldn't be worrying in the 4th quarter.
@Blair Kiel posted:Instructions radioed in from the grassy knoll.
Grassy hole
Again Summers not covering his guy. He cannot be expected to cover a WR.
@PackerPatrick posted:Summers looks slow
He's known for that
Texans finally get some possession time. Might cost Rodgers a 6 TD game. 
Just gonna say this once. If you have a roster that depends on people like Ty Summers to play extensively, you're going to have a difficult time winning championships.
@PackerPatrick posted:Summers looks slow
But he's short.
This just in. Ty Summers was a 7th round pick for a reason.
@Boris posted:😕
I have no doubt the Texans offense will score.
Nostradamus strikes again!
We have to upgrade the LB position in the offseason. They cannot cover anyone
It’s why we are playing a guy like Greene who may be a hybrid but he can’t cover anyone either.
There's the Packer defense we know & love.
Can we get 30 more points total between these 2 teams?
@Blair Kiel posted:But he's short.
Even a good week of practice can't fix that
@Pakrz posted:Just gonna say this once. If you have a roster that depends on people like Ty Summers to play extensively, you're going to have a difficult time winning championships.
You'll win 10 or 11 regular-season games and then get steamrolled by good teams that can exploit the middle of the field. None of the three guys they have to replace Martinez (Kirksey, Summers, or Barnes) is an upgrade.
@Henry posted:This just in. Ty Summers was a 7th round pick for a reason.
But Trophies had him in the HOF.