Skip to main content

@BrainDed posted:

Lol.   Not a chance in hell with that throw.    So bad.

The receiver that wasn't there didn't fight hard enough for the ball. Just like every pass, receiver didn't fight hard enough, ran the wrong route, caught it behind him and late but didn't get any yac, blah, blah, blah.

Still can't throw for 300 yards and scored 19 points and somehow the bar is so low that it's considered a good game. Pathetic.

.

@titmfatied posted:

He did get hit mid release

Still have no clue how to embed a tweet  

Screenshot_20231112-142428

Screenshot_20231112-142013

Screenshot_20231112-142037

Screenshot_20231112-142154

TaDaaaa!!! 🤭

Attachments

Images (4)
  • Screenshot_20231112-142013
  • Screenshot_20231112-142037
  • Screenshot_20231112-142154
  • Screenshot_20231112-142428
Last edited by Boris

I'm not saying.....I'm just saying..... 🤬🖕🏼

@Boris posted:

I'm not saying.....I'm just saying..... 🤬🖕🏼

The only thing I can think of is they were going by the "receiver's" feet.

Or the home team camera crew somehow withheld that angle shot.

When the receiver's feet are even with the QB's and the receiver has to spin 180 degrees with arms extended to try to catch a ball that goes off his fingertips, I'm pretty sure it's a backward pass. The zebras were horse's asses on that one.

@FLPACKER posted:

I thought it is where the ball is when released, not where the feet are ...correct?

It is and it's ridiculous they don't use the chip. The office in NY should have access to that information and it's real simple to know.

The yard line is straight...yes??

Screenshot_20231112-162650

Screenshot_20231112-162650~2

Screenshot_20231112-163010~2

Screenshot_20231112-163010~3

It's just fucking ridiculous to get it wrong. We all have HD TV. We all can see it. 

This kind of shit occurs in every game. I don't even get mad any more. It's pointless because the NFL will keep games close so people don't turn the channel. It doesn't matter what actually happens on the field. They will call it to keep it close.

Attachments

Images (4)
  • Screenshot_20231112-162650
  • Screenshot_20231112-162650~2
  • Screenshot_20231112-163010~2
  • Screenshot_20231112-163010~3

It was clearly a backwards pass but I don't think it matters where anybody's feet are. I think it's determined by where the ball is when released from the QB's hand and where it is when it arrives at the receiver.

@Boris posted:

The yard line is straight...yes??

Screenshot_20231112-162650

Screenshot_20231112-162650~2

Screenshot_20231112-163010~2

Screenshot_20231112-163010~3

It's just fucking ridiculous to get it wrong. We all have HD TV. We all can see it.

This kind of shit occurs in every game. I don't even get mad any more. It's pointless because the NFL will keep games close so people don't turn the channel. It doesn't matter what actually happens on the field. They will call it to keep it close.

It was a bad call, however if they gave the Pack the score it still would have been close.  Real close

Check out the ignorant final sentence in this article. Little effect?????

.......................

NFL fans were none too pleased with CBS’s Gene Steratore on Sunday after the rules analyst and former NFL official offered a curious take on a questionable call during Week 10’s Packers-Steelers game.


Steratore found himself in a bit of controversy after agreeing with the officiating crew for deeming an apparent illegal forward pass from Steelers quarterback Kenny Pickett an incompletion.


“Sometimes these are really difficult,” Steratore said of the play. “To me, it was just not enough to overturn one way or the other, guys. You may disagree with me, Charles, but I just felt like it was a tough one.”


The Packers’ unsuccessful challenge, despite Steratore’s analysis, was quickly met by disdain from CBS commentator Charles Davis, who said he disagreed “vehemently” with the call before the ex-ref explained his view.


“I think if the official on the side moves himself in position, Davis said, “he sees clearly that that’s a lateral and that should’ve been Green Bay’s ball.”


Although the ruling had little effect on Pittsburgh’s eventual 23–19 win, many fans made sure to let their disapproval of Steratore known in the moment

@PackerRick posted:

It was clearly a backwards pass but I don't think it matters where anybody's feet are. I think it's determined by where the ball is when released from the QB's hand and where it is when it arrives at the receiver.

At best the pass is straight down the line which is still a lateral. I was showing where his front foot is in relation to the yard line for ease of seeing his relative position on the field. He releases the ball about a yard behind and the pass ends up 1.5 yards behind the yard line.

The Packers still had chances to win this game & didn't get it done.

@Pikes Peak posted:

It was a bad call, however if they gave the Pack the score it still would have been close.  Real close

Don't disagree 🙂👍🏼

The Packers haven't won in Pittsburgh since Starr was QB

Last edited by Boris

It is easier to see than looking at footwork.  The QB's arm is ahead of the 14 yard line marker when he releases the ball and the receiver's hands are between the 13 and 14 yard markers when he drops the lateral.  Yah, I'm not calling it a pass either.

@Boris posted:

At best the pass is straight down the line which is still a lateral. I was showing where his front foot is in relation to the yard line for ease of seeing his relative position on the field. He releases the ball about a yard behind and the pass ends up 1.5 yards behind the yard line.

The Packers still had chances to win this game & didn't get it done.

Don't disagree 🙂👍🏼

The Packers haven't won in Pittsburgh since Starr was QB

The Steelers were complete doormats in the 60s. But don't ask Steeler fans, they either don't remember or weren't on the bandwagon yet. Pittsburgh fans are so overrated. Check out attendance at a preseason game or a Pirates game.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×