Skip to main content

@Dr._Bob posted:

If they could fight Covid with those AK47s, I have no doubt they would be out in force shooting up those foreign Wuhan viruses.  But if the solution makes them feel weak?  Not a chance.  They feel stronger fighting the people who are talking about it.  I think the key to understanding all of this is that reason is and always has been irrelevant.  It's emotions that drive us.

THAT'S BULLSHIT! *begins sobbing*

Yeah.  I don't get it either.  I really feel bad about his death.  He was high risk, too.

So, if he knew he was high risk due to his battle with cancer, then he should've worn a mask and social distanced a bit more IF he had to go the rally.   I really would like to hear from his family on that thought process.    Did he have a mask but took it off once the rally started?   It is strange.

The rally was five weeks ago. I doubt that was the culprit. 

I look at wearing a mask like arguing with Mrs Timmy!
I may be 100% right, but in the long run, it's much easier just to say "yes, dear" and move on. 

Edited to add with current restrictions now in place, it's virtually impossible to go to any 'public' environment without having a mask requirement.
Apparently, exceptions are made, and there are the type of people who are willing to fight over it, and most store personnel won't challenge those that won't comply, but it's easier to go along with the program and gtfo asap.

Last edited by Timmy!
@Timmy! posted:

I look at wearing a mask like arguing with Mrs Timmy!
I may be 100% right, but in the long run, it's much easier just to say "yes, dear" and move on. 

Edited to add with current restrictions now in place, it's virtually impossible to go to any 'public' environment without having a mask requirement.
Apparently, exceptions are made, and there are the type of people who are willing to fight over it, and most store personnel won't challenge those that won't comply, but it's easier to go along with the program and gtfo asap.

We've had mask policies in stores for awhile now in New York State. 99% of the people in our area are complying, however when they don't I don't see store employees challenging them. Of course I have limited variety of stores since I've really only been going in grocery stores. 

@Timmy! posted:

No matter the discussion, there's always the asshole(s) who feels compelled to bring their political views into it. 

So I'll add mine: 
Those same owners who donated 7 figures to Trump's campaign are the same ones who make it possible for us to enjoy the game of football.
Pretty goddamned ironic, no?

Green Bay Packers-proof positive that community owned initiatives are far superior to businesses focused entirely on greed and profit.....You could call it socialism, but really it is just the benefit of smart partnerships and a curbing of unnecessary excesses of wealth and hubris.

At what point does the NFL need to look at a bubble format like the NBA to save their season?   The idea that teams and players will be able to travel and have unlimited movement (like MLB) and not incur mass infections is misguided optimism at best.  The difference in baseball is they can move their schedule around and call up players.  I still don’t think the baseball season survives but the NFL?  No chance in hell. 

Pick one bubble location for each division and play each team twice.  Allow for 2-3 bye weeks to allow for flex scheduling options.  Playoffs could be played in home stadiums to reward the best teams but it could be spread out by a couple of weeks to build in automatic quarantine periods. 

As for college football, my personal opinion is it should simply be moved to Spring 2021.  They face even greater hurdles than the NFL to get a season in.  Start in March and finish by Memorial Day. 

@FLPACKER posted:

We've had mask policies in stores for awhile now in New York State. 99% of the people in our area are complying, however when they don't I don't see store employees challenging them. Of course I have limited variety of stores since I've really only been going in grocery stores. 

We never should have put minimum wage employees in charge of public health anyway.  Every video I see of grocery store employees getting berated makes me want to see that person get violent diarrhea at that very moment.  We ask teachers to be child mental health experts, police to be social works and cashiers to be nurses.  Add Dr. Facebook to the mix and it's no wonder we are proactively thinning the heard.  We celebrate anti-science dumbfuckery, I thought it was bad when we actively brought back measles, turns out that was just the prologue.  

Last edited by "We"-Ka-Bong

There is already spring football and hopefully by then a vaccine is developed that’s why timing might make sense.  But I don’t disagree with the criticisms or arguments.   I think college football has the biggest challenge of all the sports including professional sports. 

The NBA is in the same boat for next year but guessing they push back the start to  holiday period like Mark Cuban suggested. 

Any plan that doesn’t include some form of a bubble is destined to fail 

Ultimately some of the decision processes for college football may come down to whether the new congressional coronavirus rescue package contains a provision that makes universities (and businesses) immune to liability if people die from COVID after having students or workers come back.  That's one of McConnell's biggest priorities and if universities know they can't be sued if they pack people into football stadiums (or at least get the TV money) and rake in the cash, I can guarantee you there will be college football - especially in the SEC.  

If you provide organizations immunity from the consequences of making decisions that put their people at risk, they will make riskier decisions.
Liability law serves an important purpose.  Allowing businesses to discount the health and well being of their employees, or student athletes, when calculating the efficacy of a business plan is bad public policy.

Ultimately some of the decision processes for college football may come down to whether the new congressional coronavirus rescue package contains a provision that makes universities (and businesses) immune to liability if people die from COVID after having students or workers come back.  That's one of McConnell's biggest priorities and if universities know they can't be sued if they pack people into football stadiums (or at least get the TV money) and rake in the cash, I can guarantee you there will be college football - especially in the SEC.  

It would be difficult to trace it back to a college's fault anyway. Kids are out partying all the time all over the place with all sorts of folks. How would you trace that? 

@antooo posted:

If you provide organizations immunity from the consequences of making decisions that put their people at risk, they will make riskier decisions.
Liability law serves an important purpose.  Allowing businesses to discount the health and well being of their employees, or student athletes, when calculating the efficacy of a business plan is bad public policy.

I don't disagree with you, but McConnell has stated that this is non-negotiable.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/2...ity-protections.html

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×