Skip to main content

Even in pass-happy NFL top 10 teams in % of plays they pass (ATL,NYG,MIA,PIT,CLE,DAL,STL,WAS,JAX,ARI) a combined 18-38. Only MIA above .500
 

Now, maybe it is because these teams suck and are often playing catch up, but with the Packers emphasis on a more balanced attack, could we be seeing an ever so slight correction back to the norm for run/pass split? Of the top 6 teams in rush yards / game only BUF is below .500 and they are not Top 10 in yards / carry.

 

The Packers are 6th in rush yards / game. T2nd in yards / carry. 5th in passing yards / game and T2nd in yards / completion... Nice to have the balance!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I think it's clear that pass pro is the only thing holding this team back. I'm not buying into any argument that says Rodgers is thrown off by the running games success.  

 

It's borderline absurd.  So LB's having to respect the LOS more, thus creating bigger lanes to throw in somehow has Rodgers flustered?    What about the playoff run with Starks, he didn't look flustered when we opened against CHG with play action to Jennings multiple times for 60 yards or so.  

We are already seeing dividends in balance.  Losing Jones and Cobb would've been a absolute killer last year.  

 

It speaks highly to MM implementing the change in blocking scheme and TT getting the players needed.  Running game is developing, the OLB situation is evolving, hopefully Hayward can help mask the safety deficiency.  

 

What becomes intriguing is what this oline can do in the future when Buluga, Tretter and Sherrod become options.  I'm looking forward to Tretter getting off the PUP and using the rest of the season and next years TC to learn the system.  

 

Overall the wins have been ugly but evolving.  Pass game needs to get in stride.  Don't need gaudy numbers but we need Rodgers efficiency.  Pass protection has been mentioned.  The whole "not respecting the LOS" would also explain Cobb coming out of the backfield for big gains.  If that is what it takes then Franklin needs to fill the roll.  We've seen a sample of what he can do.  Yet, I do agree the red zone production needs to get on track.

 

 

Last edited by Henry
Originally Posted by FLPACKER:

Defenses will continue to give us 150 yards on the ground in exchange for not allowing big plays in the passing game. 

This approach has certainly worked out well for teams this season...Packers are tied for 6th in pass plays of 20+ yards (24) and 4th in pass plays of 40+ (5). They're also 7th in the NFL in running plays of 20+ yards (5) and 2nd in running plays of 20+ (2). We're averaging 309 pass yards per game (5th in NFL) and 140 rush yards per game (6th in NFL). Based on those numbers I can't tell if defenses are daring us to run or pass because we're doing both very well and if they're trying to prevent big plays then they're not doing a very good job. 

Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
Originally Posted by FLPACKER:

Defenses will continue to give us 150 yards on the ground in exchange for not allowing big plays in the passing game. 

This approach has certainly worked out well for teams this season...Packers are tied for 6th in pass plays of 20+ yards (24) and 4th in pass plays of 40+ (5). They're also 7th in the NFL in running plays of 20+ yards (5) and 2nd in running plays of 20+ (2). We're averaging 309 pass yards per game (5th in NFL) and 140 rush yards per game (6th in NFL). Based on those numbers I can't tell if defenses are daring us to run or pass because we're doing both very well and if they're trying to prevent big plays then they're not doing a very good job. 

Thanks for the stats, I was just thinking this morning how many TD passes of over 15 yards we have had this season compared to the rest of the league? Teams are clearly playing us to stop the pass, LT and others have also commented on this when asked about Lacy's success, pointing out that teams are playing us 6 in the box. I'm wondering where our stats would be minus the Redskins game, in which Haslett played the first half in a look that dared us to pass (AR's words, not mine). 

Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
Originally Posted by FLPACKER:

Defenses will continue to give us 150 yards on the ground in exchange for not allowing big plays in the passing game. 

This approach has certainly worked out well for teams this season...Packers are tied for 6th in pass plays of 20+ yards (24) and 4th in pass plays of 40+ (5). They're also 7th in the NFL in running plays of 20+ yards (5) and 2nd in running plays of 20+ (2). We're averaging 309 pass yards per game (5th in NFL) and 140 rush yards per game (6th in NFL). Based on those numbers I can't tell if defenses are daring us to run or pass because we're doing both very well and if they're trying to prevent big plays then they're not doing a very good job. 

 

That's great but I think the point isn't the overall yardage but yards and scoring in the red zone.  Packers are 13th in red zone production right now.  I fully expect that to shift as the season goes forward.  It's a testament to this team being a more rounded team.  Defense isn't getting blown away (thank you Burnett) and Crosby appears to have his head relatively straight again.  

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×