Skip to main content

I got this off JSOnline:

Troy Aikman is in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. He’s in the College Football Hall of Fame. He’s a National Football League lead game analyst for a broadcast network, Fox.

So since his first year in the NFL in 1989 until now he has had a pretty good seat from which to view the popularity of pro football.

You might not expect Aikman to be someone to predict the NFL won’t be as popular, say, 20 years from now. But that’s exactly what he said last week in Los Angeles, during a panel discussion about bringing an NFL team to that city. He did not say what sport would replace football in popularity.

"I believe, and this is my opinion, that at some point football is not going to be the number one sport," Aikman said. "You talk about the ebbs and flows of what’s popular and what’s not. At some point, the TV ratings are not going to be there. I can’t justify that because the numbers say otherwise (now), but I guess time will tell."

Concern about concussions could have an impact on football’s popularity.

Aikman said he does not have a son, but he doesn’t know if he would encourage him to play football.

"I wouldn’t tell him he couldn’t play football," Aikman said. "If he wanted to, I would say, ‘OK, great.’ "

But "with other sports, you want your kids to be active and doing those types of things," Aikman said.

Aikman suggested televised NFL football might be spread out over too many days.

"At one time, watching football was an event," Aikman said. " ‘Monday Night Football’ was a big event. Now you get football Sunday, you get it Monday, you get it Thursday and, late in the year, you get it on Saturday."

Fans in Los Angeles, like fans who can’t see Thursday night games on the NFL Network, may have grown used to that absence.

"People in Los Angeles realized, ‘You know what, life’s OK without the NFL.’ If I’m an owner, I don’t want any fan thinking that."



I may have to agree with Troy. Long range future of football at the collegiate and NFL level may indeed fall out of the number spot in American sports.

50-60 years ago many sports fans probably never imagined the baseball would tumble from the top favorite sports spot. But it has and it seems to be slowly sliding down.

My guess is there are a number of reasons why baseball dropped off. Player union and salaries. Owners greed and stubborness. Not adapting to the market.

I see the same issues coming up with football. College has become a mega-business for big schools. And with it, ticket prices and related costs are slowly putting the game out of reach for true fans and making it too professionalized also. Players are becoming major celebrities. Not only locally, but nationally.

The NFL is there too. Rising salaries, new stadiums that burden owners, fans and taxpayers. Advertising costs seek to raise revenues and those too come back to bear down on the consumer with higher prices.

It begs the question too: At what point does the desire to win become diluted by the money and power that engulf its participants? How many college players worry more their playing future than how they can help their team win? How many pro-players just show-up on Sundays knowing they paycheck will be deposited if they catch that pass or not, or tackle that runner or not?

Yeah, I think Troy might be right. Like he said "guess, only time will tell". And will I live long enough to see it?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
50-60 years ago many sports fans probably never imagined the baseball would tumble from the top favorite sports spot. But it has and it seems to be slowly sliding down.


Baseball dropped because the sport became saturated with cheaters and small market teams had and continue to have no real chance of maintaining a winning franchise. Bottom line that is why the sport bowed down to the NFL. When a fan is watching a sport where he believes or has strong reason to believe player A is as good as he is because of chemicals OR is in a market not named NY, LA, Boston, etc it's kind of hard to root for that sport.

I don't think it has anything to do with baseball suddenly got boring. It was entirely about roids and teams like the Yankee's who regularly buy World Championships.

The NBA? Here you have ME first players who half ass it up and down the court, are incredibly over paid and you have Ref's who have openly admitted to fixing games and purposefully not calling fouls because it was Koby or Shack or Jordan.

If the NFL becomes unpopular or drops from #1 it will be because of the above or they found a way to fu** it up. IMO it would have nothing to do with the game itself suddenly becoming Ho Hum.
Baseball was trashed because there are so many hopeless teams like the Royals and Pirates that will never be able to compete against Los Angeles, Boston, Philadelphia and New York. I still root for my Oakland Athletics, but I know that they'll never have that little bit of oomph needed to put them over the top when they do manage to get into the playoffs. Not only do they have all the money for players, but they've learned from teams like the A's to also spend their mountains of money on building up their farm systems and scouting departments. Billy Beane's methods seem to have run out of steam as of late due to the old wells running dry.
The one thing that the NFL has done a poor job of is ensuring the product on the field is of the highest quality. It doesn't bear out right now in popularity, but I think there are signs that the game is losing its luster in this regard.

The main culprit, IMO, has been officiating. They have gone too far with many things, which we all have discussed before. They made officiating too complex, putting too many rules in place. Replay is essential, but they still just cannot allow an official in the booth to look, make a call, an d relay it. A dumb-f**k official has to go under the hood, and then half the time they miss the obvious call anyway.

But the one thing that has to happen is the popularity of another sport must take viewers away. MLB won't compete- different season. NBA is a sad joke, despite being a more exciting sport. Hockey cannot do it.

So while I do think the popularity will wane because people will eventually grow tired of the overly complex rulebook and the over-exposure he speaks of, they'll still be #1 because the game's very nature is perfect for the "now" generations that technology is rearing. 16 games versus 82 or 162... people have short attention spans, and football doesn't demand nearly as much perosnal time as other sports.
I agree with Aikman and with Music City.

For me, the lack of consistency in officiating, and/or when the officiating makes the rules meaningless such that strategy is no longer possible (as in the NBA), I'll find something else to do. The reason form my enjoyment will cease to exist.

I don't think anything has to compete with it sports wise, like Aikman says about Los Angeles, they find something else to do. There are a lot of other ways for me to spend my time. But for now, I do enjoy the game.
I think his stance is reasonable, though I just don't see what sport could topple it. And I agree that the officiating is the problem. My view: most of these "experienced" refs are just too old. Get some new blood into the league. And KISS, especially when it comes to what is and isn't a touchdown.
quote:
Originally posted by Timmy!:
I guess it could be possible...but what would replace it?


I think two things will threaten the long-term success of pro-sports:

Technology - who know what devices and play-things will be invented in the next two decades?

Money - Corporate dollars are pouring into teams. Tickets getting out of reach for everyday fans; What did the SB tickets cost this year? $3K $4K?? Plus they will develop PPV for all teams. In order to see your favorite team, you will have to pay to watch on TV. ie., Sunday Ticket...but everyone will have to pay to watch.
quote:
Aikman suggested televised NFL football might be spread out over too many days.

"At one time, watching football was an event," Aikman said. " ‘Monday Night Football’ was a big event. Now you get football Sunday, you get it Monday, you get it Thursday and, late in the year, you get it on Saturday."


the above and the idiocy of an 18 game schedule and/or adding more teams. also, the ridiculous rules and refs. yep, keep watering down the product and raising the prices and the NFL will make Aikman correct.
quote:
Originally posted by GBP1:

I think two things will threaten the long-term success of pro-sports:

Technology - who know what devices and play-things will be invented in the next two decades?

Money - Corporate dollars are pouring into teams. Tickets getting out of reach for everyday fans; What did the SB tickets cost this year? $3K $4K?? Plus they will develop PPV for all teams. In order to see your favorite team, you will have to pay to watch on TV. ie., Sunday Ticket...but everyone will have to pay to watch.



I agree about the money being a factor if the NFL were to decline in popularity. Today it costs a small fortune to take a family of 4 to an NFL game, I can't imagine what it will cost even 5 years from now.
Aikman is right the NFL is slowly ruining the game. Do not reject his opinion just becouse he is a blowhard, somethimes even jerks like Aikman are right.
Do not underestimate the importance of the concept of event. An event is not any everyday experience it is something that happens only occasionally or is difficult or expensive to attend. Going to Broadway show is an event it is difficult to get tickets, has to be planned in advance, is an occasion for many to dress up and have a special evening. Going to a Packer game for many is an event of a life time because getting a ticket can be very difficult.
The Wizard of Oz in 60’s was broadcasted only once a year around Thanksgiving, the movie was an event for families. Monday night football in the 70’s and 80’s was an event, it was one of the few times people could see their favorite team if they lived out side the home marker. The half time show so was the only chance people had to see any part of a game not broadcasted in their market.

Football is becoming over exposed, if you can see the game anytime it is not special. The NFL allows way too many commercials during the game, it is annoying to watch at home and all the breaks ruin the stadium experience. Football does not need more games, more mid week games, what it needs more then anything else is less commerical breaks.
quote:
Originally posted by turnip blood:
Aikman is right the NFL is slowly ruining the game. Do not reject his opinion just becouse he is a blowhard, somethimes even jerks like Aikman are right.
Do not underestimate the importance of the concept of event. An event is not any everyday experience it is something that happens only occasionally or is difficult or expensive to attend. Going to Broadway show is an event it is difficult to get tickets, has to be planned in advance, is an occasion for many to dress up and have a special evening. Going to a Packer game for many is an event of a life time because getting a ticket can be very difficult.
The Wizard of Oz in 60’s was broadcasted only once a year around Thanksgiving, the movie was an event for families. Monday night football in the 70’s and 80’s was an event, it was one of the few times people could see their favorite team if they lived out side the home marker. The half time show so was the only chance people had to see any part of a game not broadcasted in their market.

Football is becoming over exposed, if you can see the game anytime it is not special. The NFL allows way too many commercials during the game, it is annoying to watch at home and all the breaks ruin the stadium experience. Football does not need more games, more mid week games, what it needs more then anything else is less commerical breaks.
The constant bending of the rules to allow more offensive production has cheapened the game just as much (if not more) than the increase in TV coverage. I really don't know what the NFL is thinking with going so far to this extreme. If NFL fans dug what we saw last year so much, the Arena league would be a lot more popular than it is. Virtually every fan I've heard speaking on this matter doesn't care for the weak, sissified play that we saw on the field last year. Tim Tebow would have had a passer rating of <40 and take ten sacks every week if he had played in the NFL just 8-9 years ago.
I do believe quality play and performance have been eroding in the NFL ever since "parity" became the standard. And it is becoming more and more evident as some of you have cited already.

As things are headed now, Money, Power and Greed will bring it down one day...it is inevitable.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×