Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

He had the knowledge and the instincts and the vision, he just had a painfully slow trigger to attack the ball carrier. Occasionally he would make the right read and go for it, but too often he was 1 or 2 steps slow to get there. It wasn't because he wasn't athletic enough or strong enough, he was too indecisive. Perhaps he was just thinking too much whereas guys like Bishop just went for it. 

Hawk was never a problem in the locker room or as a teammate. His coaches loved him. He was also great in the community.

But he was also paid over $34,000,000 and the Packers received little production in return, so I fully understand why folks view him as they do. I also could not believe how much better the D became immediately after Hawk was benched mid-season in 2014. He really was a bad player his last few years in GB.

Not A.J.'s fault he was over drafted, but that 2nd contract in 2011 (5 years for $33.75 million -- reduced, of course, after 2 years of subpar play) was TT's worst as a Packers' GM in my opinion.

YATittle posted:

I'll always dislike him for the fake field goal in the playoff game against the Seahawks. Seriously, a high school player wouldn't let the ONLY GUY on this side race down the field unimpeded.... OTHERS had contain on the play... MORON cost us a trip to the Super Bowl with just that ONE PLAY.

Even though I have tried my best to forget that play and that game as whole, I always thought Brad Jones was the culprit. 

chickenboy posted:
YATittle posted:

I'll always dislike him for the fake field goal in the playoff game against the Seahawks. Seriously, a high school player wouldn't let the ONLY GUY on this side race down the field unimpeded.... OTHERS had contain on the play... MORON cost us a trip to the Super Bowl with just that ONE PLAY.

Even though I have tried my best to forget that play and that game as whole, I always thought Brad Jones was the culprit. 

They both ****ed up massively on that play, Jones by losing contain and Hawk letting the receiver fly past him.

Biggest FU belongs to Slocum however for 1) Having those guys on the field then and 2) Most importantly, not warning everyone about a fake. Given how outmatched the Seahawks were up to that point something like that was clearly going to happen to try and get things jumpstarted.

Last edited by ilcuqui

I still don't get the "Hawk was only maligned bc he was a high draft pick" comments.  Fact is, he was a terrible player on the field for for much of his last contract.  He literally did nothing well on the field.  He got Jarrett Bush type criticism bc that was the player he was: so limited on the field that it was simply infuriating to watch and baffling that he was the best TT and the coaches could do.  He was solid early in his career, became average pretty quick, and then became a huge weak link in this defense.  He was the poster boy for Dom's failed defense.  Can't say for anyone else, but that's what my criticism of Hawk is based on.  No different than my criticism of lesser drafted starters like Bush, McMillian, etc.  

And FYI, I don't blame TT at all for drafting him at #5.  Hawk's resume was impeccable: lot of production at a big program with great measurables, no off field concerns at all, and a work ethic/leadership that you don't see often.  

I wish him luck though.  I was shocked the Bengals signed him last year so not surprised they moved on.  I can see Hawk eventually becoming a position coach like Kevin Greene.  

Last edited by CUPackFan

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×