{sigh}
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
40+ hours for Yuck. I think it's time for someone else to make that pick.
Sorry about the delay. H5 is right.
50 people over for our belated annual St. Pat's party Saturday.......I think I'm still hung over......for the record Joe that's called having a life.
Chefs select Travis Beckum TE Wisconsin.
50 people over for our belated annual St. Pat's party Saturday.......I think I'm still hung over......for the record Joe that's called having a life.
Chefs select Travis Beckum TE Wisconsin.
quote:Originally posted by Hungry5:
52 hour wait for Beckum?
Def still drunk when he made that choice.
quote:Originally posted by Mr.Yuck:
for the record Joe that's called having a life.
Another one who thinks they know something about my life when in fact they know nothing.
P.S. Congratulations for actually picking a player that hadn't already been selected. I figured with further practice you would eventually be able to wrap your mind about the complexity (
) of an internet mock draft. And to be able to do it right while hung-over, very impressive.....
quote:Originally posted by PackerJoe:quote:Originally posted by Mr.Yuck:
for the record Joe that's called having a life.
Post these a few more times, that will make us believe you don't live your life in sniffers row when you aren't hanging out with your Star Trek collectibles.
quote:Originally posted by Henry:
Post these a few more times, that will make us believe you don't live your life in sniffers row when you aren't hanging out with your Star Trek collectibles.
"Make us believe"
But what you believe will have no basis in reality whatsoever. Of course you wouldn't care about something like that since your posts never really say much of anything anyway.
quote:Originally posted by PackerJoe:quote:Originally posted by Henry:
Post these a few more times, that will make us believe you don't live your life in sniffers row when you aren't hanging out with your Star Trek collectibles.
"Make us believe"
But what you believe will have no basis in reality whatsoever. Of course you wouldn't care about something like that since your posts never really say much of anything anyway.
Hell, if you can't post a bunch in cherry picked, intellectually dishonest (or for that matter intellectual) stats to inflate your self worth, what do you really have? You got life by the balls PJ. Post a couple more emoticons to show us how large you're livin'. USA! USA! USA!
quote:Originally posted by Henry:
Hell, if you can't post a bunch in cherry picked, intellectually dishonest (or for that matter intellectual) stats to inflate your self worth, what do you really have? You got life by the balls PJ. Post a couple more emoticons to show us how large you're livin'. USA! USA! USA!
Well I tell you what Henry, you could have gone out and done some work and found some factual information about last year's Packer team, or generated some "non-cherry picked" statistics to back up your argument, but rather than doing that you came up with some nonsense about the 2007 Giants. And then when you get called on it, the next line of reasoning you inject into the debate is "I bet you never played organized sports."
And after all of that you accuse me of being intellectually dishonest.
You are pathetic.
Typical. Ignore the whole of the argument so it will work with your little snapshot of stats. Like I said, you like to use the Dallas game to make your point. What about the Texans game? The argument is there and it's sound, you just choose to ignore it. Instead you use a subjective data sample to project on the whole season and as a measure against something that can't be measured in stats. Let's make sure we use a very limited data sample to make a projection for a whole from now on. That makes really good sense in the world of mathematics, statistics or science. For someone who doesn't care about the organized sports comment you sure are getting your panties in a twist over it.
Pathetic? Fire up those emoticons. I'm very comfortable with my statements. Don't worry about the "intellectually dishonest" comment, worry about the "intellectual" part first.
Pathetic? Fire up those emoticons. I'm very comfortable with my statements. Don't worry about the "intellectually dishonest" comment, worry about the "intellectual" part first.
Over / Under on this thread gettng locked before the next pick?
quote:Originally posted by Henry:
Post these a few more times, that will make us believe you don't live your life in sniffers row when you aren't hanging out with your Star Trek collectibles.
That sounds like a heck of a Tuesday!
quote:Originally posted by Herschel:quote:Originally posted by Henry:
Post these a few more times, that will make us believe you don't live your life in sniffers row when you aren't hanging out with your Star Trek collectibles.
That sounds like a heck of a Tuesday!
If only there was a way to combine the two . . .
you've all had your fun.
Take it to PM
Take it to PM
I'll take the over on this thread getting locked.
I'll take the under on me deleting posts.
Take it to PM or shut your pie hole. Both of you.
I picked for Dallas LOUIS MURPHY WR Florida
I'll take the under on me deleting posts.
Take it to PM or shut your pie hole. Both of you.
I picked for Dallas LOUIS MURPHY WR Florida
quote:Originally posted by Boris:
shut your pie hole.
quote:Originally posted by Henry:
Is there something wrong with this picture?
