Bracket speaking: Cowherd vs Patrick

GoldieMember

I gotta go with Cowherd, talks almost ALL sports....not sports/entertainment like Dan Patrick does. I love a little entertainment news sprinkled in on some topics, but come on Dan....sheesh....way to much for a "sports" show. JMHO.

3/21/139:58 AM

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

HerschelMember

The completely useless Cowturd vs. the at least entertaining Patrick and you prefer Cowturd?

3/21/1310:13 AM

GoldieMember

Yes I do.

3/21/1310:41 AM

"We"-Ka-BongYou ungrateful biscuit eating son of a bitch

I can listen to Patrick for approx. 6 more minutes than Cowherd before I start to hate that I have ears.

3/21/1312:49 PM

FedyaMember

quote:
The completely useless Cowturd vs. the at least entertaining Patrick and you prefer Cowturd?

Cowherd must be one of Goldie's 4502454328965536967354768386782405824653655 boyfriends.

3/21/131:46 PM

GoldieMember

ha ha, nope not even close...

3/21/138:04 PM

PackyMember

Dan Patrick by a mile.

3/21/138:16 PM

ChilliJonI hate the Vikings!

Like Dan over Colin. Not a fan of the Dan-ettes though. And I have to change to another station after the second Callaway golf club or Dodge Ram plug.

3/21/139:07 PM

FandameMember

Dan is a condescending idot. Cowherd is just an idot.

3/21/1310:39 PM

GBP1Member

Colin all the way.

I admit that years ago I used to dislike him alot too. But he has evolved and he has gained quite a large following on ESPN radio. He used to make many rasg statements just for ratings...which he admitted. Now he doesnt have to.

I like that he translates alot of what goes on in sports to what happens in real life. He doesnt talk stats either. He can present some very tough and objective opinions which angers many fans and he aint afraid to admit he was wrong. He will say things that have an educational element and makes his listeners think for themselves.

As for Dan Patrick. His radio show began to bore me years ago. Then he got his little group of Danettes. I think Dan is a remarkably good interviewer. But when he plays to the Danettes, it's too much kiss butt for me. Too many inside jokes too. Dan just reports news and comments. He doesnt offer me the same insight on stories like Colin does.

3/22/1312:34 AM

GoallineLarge Antenna

What? Colin evolve? N-word, is you crazy? You devolved.

Dan is really interesting when he talks about sports (10% of the time) and really boring when he doesn't.

3/22/139:14 AM

JJSDSitzpinkler Schadenfreude

I weep for the present.

This pablum needs to be ignored, not taken seriously much less applied to real life.

Holy ****.

3/22/139:24 AM

IowacheeseKeen Insight

KapooyaKapooya

3/22/139:51 AM

TimpranilloMember

quote:
Originally posted by GBP1:
Colin all the way.

I admit that years ago I used to dislike him alot too. But he has evolved and he has gained quite a large following on ESPN radio. He used to make many rasg statements just for ratings...which he admitted. Now he doesnt have to.

I like that he translates alot of what goes on in sports to what happens in real life. He doesnt talk stats either. He can present some very tough and objective opinions which angers many fans and he aint afraid to admit he was wrong. He will say things that have an educational element and makes his listeners think for themselves.

As for Dan Patrick. His radio show began to bore me years ago. Then he got his little group of Danettes. I think Dan is a remarkably good interviewer. But when he plays to the Danettes, it's too much kiss butt for me. Too many inside jokes too. Dan just reports news and comments. He doesnt offer me the same insight on stories like Colin does.

I tried responding to this rationally 3 times. I can't.

This is the most asinine post I've ever read on timesfour.

Evolved

Tough

Objective

3/22/139:54 AM

H5Keyboard Warrior, troll hunter

Why listen to sports-talk radio when you have the internets for info and informed takes?

3/22/1310:13 AM

PDXPackFanMember

quote:
Originally posted by GBP1:
Colin all the way.

I admit that years ago I used to dislike him alot too. But he has evolved and he has gained quite a large following on ESPN radio. He used to make many rasg statements just for ratings...which he admitted. Now he doesnt have to.

I like that he translates alot of what goes on in sports to what happens in real life. He doesnt talk stats either. He can present some very tough and objective opinions which angers many fans and he aint afraid to admit he was wrong. He will say things that have an educational element and makes his listeners think for themselves.

As for Dan Patrick. His radio show began to bore me years ago. Then he got his little group of Danettes. I think Dan is a remarkably good interviewer. But when he plays to the Danettes, it's too much kiss butt for me. Too many inside jokes too. Dan just reports news and comments. He doesnt offer me the same insight on stories like Colin does.

Agreed!... well said

3/22/1310:55 AM

HenryYou rang?

It's like a who's who . . .

3/22/1311:02 AM

GoallineLarge Antenna

Who?

3/22/1312:22 PM

Shoeless JoeMember

He hasn't been here in a while.

3/22/1312:33 PM

FedyaMember

quote:
Who?

The first baseman.

3/22/1312:55 PM

BorisPerson Man Camera Dildo Shop - NFLFU®

Quite Frankly.....Colin is an asshat

Dan Patrick hasn't been even a blip on my radar ever since him & Keith Olberman left Sportscenter.

Only "media" guy I like is Rich Eisen. I think he's excellent.

3/22/132:18 PM

H5Keyboard Warrior, troll hunter

They have "radio" shows on TV... do it without the help of visuals and then I might listen.

3/22/132:25 PM

Pistol GBMember

I wish Rome would have never started the whole "Clones" thing on his radio show. He was good, until he decided all his listeners had to talk like him and be like him to call in, so now anyone who listens to his show is one of his so-called "clones"?

Gee Jim, just thought I was listening to sports talk radio, not trying to be like you.

I guess I'm just sick of egotistical people. Patrick is one too. It's all about him.

Boris is right, Colin Cowherd is an asshat. No doubt about it. Still, I can tolerate his show the longest because he focuses on football first (with hoops and baseball next, in that order). I also like that he's willing to make predictions, which Rome and Patrick never do (because then they would have to be wrong half the time, which might bruise their giant egos, and besides, it is way easier to be a Monday Morning QB).

So none of them are perfect, but at the same time, I'd venture it is a lot harder than it seems.

3/22/133:14 PM

HenryYou rang?

quote:
Originally posted by Pistol GB:

I guess I'm just sick of egotistical people. Patrick is one too. It's all about him.

That's pretty much the entirety of media personalities. They aren't called flesh props for nothing.

3/22/133:21 PM

Skip to main content

Add Reply

Membership Required

Remove From Your Block List

Manage Follow Preferences

Block

Please wait...