Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Packers with the most favorable remaining schedule.

Last edited by michiganjoe

Odds at Bovada 

*Odds taken November 13

TeamOdds to Make 2019-20 NFL Playoffs at Bovada 
Green Bay Packers-2500 
New Orleans Saints-2000 
San Francisco 49ers-2000 
Minnesota Vikings-900 
Seattle Seahawks-700 
Philadelphia Eagles-180 
Dallas Cowboys-120 
Los Angeles Rams+250 

Playoff Picture Today:

1st Seed: New Orleans Saints (Clinched Division) 10-2 (SF, IND, @TEN, @CAR) 

2nd Seed: Seattle Seahawks 10-2 (@LAR, @CAR, ARI, SF)

3rd Seed: Green Bay Packers 9-3 (WAS, CHI, @MIN, @DET) 

4th Seed: Dallas Cowboys 6-6 (@CHI, LAR, @PHI, WAS)

5th Seed: San Francisco 49ers 10-2 (@NO, ATL, LAR, @SEA

6th Seed: Minnesota Vikings 8-4 (DET, @LAC, GB, CHI) 

In the Hunt: Los Angeles Rams 7-5 (29% chance), Chicago Bears 6-6 (3% chance), Philadelphia Eagles 5-7 (27% chance)

The field is more/less set with the only possibility being the Eagles stealing the NFCE from the Cowgirls. Based on the ESPN Playoff Machine, if everyone wins out their other games, we want SF to win out and take the 1st seed. Again assuming we win out, that would give us the tiebreaker over NO at 13-3 to get the 2nd seed and would guarantee we don't have to travel to SEA. I'm not afraid of GB going to SEA, but that can be a hard stadium to play in. I'd rather get NO or SEA at home in the cold and make sure we don't have to travel until the NFCC. I would LOVE to see MIN and DAL get smashed in the first round by NO and SEA!  

Last edited by Grave Digger
Grave Digger posted:

Playoff Picture Today:

 if everyone wins out their other games, we want SF to win out and take the 1st seed. Again assuming we win out, that would give us the tiebreaker over NO at 13-3 to get the 2nd seed and would guarantee we don't have to travel to SEA. I'm not afraid of GB going to SEA, but that can be a hard stadium to play in. I'd rather get NO or SEA at home in the cold and make sure we don't have to travel until the NFCC. I would LOVE to see MIN and DAL get smashed in the first round by NO and SEA!  

Personally, I'd hate to see GB have to play the NFCC in San Fran. I think they get killed in that game. I'd rather see Seattle win their division ( I really don't think San Fran wins in Seattle, the Hags know exactly how to attack the 9ers and the hags are at home),  the 49ers upset as a WC and have another team dispatch them and be rid of 'em (not entirely implausible).

IIRC, the last 4-5 games Russell Wilson has played GB, he's thrown over 10 INT's, has a QB rating in the 70's, and for whatever reason he just hasn't played that well against the Packers.  Yes, I know every year is different but I think the Packers can beat Seattle, even in Seattle if need be. IMO, the 49ers are the worst match up vs. GB. I want them as low a seed as possible and exiting early in the playoffs         

Last edited by packerboi

I think we would have a chance against SF in SF. For whatever reason GB just wasn’t ready to play that game, but I can’t see it happening a second time. SF only has a couple vets on their roster who know how to win in the playoffs, GB has multiple guys who have battled and won in the playoffs, specifically the QB. Not saying Jimmy G can’t win in the playoffs, but we’ve seen plenty of regular season star QBs just look lost in the playoffs. 

CHI will have Hicks back vs GB and potentially a head of steam coming in if they also beat DAL this week.  Pack may have the easiest schedule of the remaining top NFC teams but none of these games look easy for them.  

The Packers have the easiest schedule of the remaining teams, but winning at MN will be difficult and I don’t think the Chicago game will be a cakewalk either. 

Assuming they lose to MN and win the rest that puts them at 12-4.   At worst a #3 seed but they’d still have to play a Seattle or SF or Minnesota in the first round versus getting a bye and letting someone else get knocked around week 1 of the playoffs. 

The team I’d least want to face is SF just because they are just so damn talented and Kittle is a matchup problem and Shanahan knows our tendencies.   Playing in New Orleans would also be very difficult.  

I’m not as concerned about Seattle because for whatever reason Wilson hasn’t played well against the Packers and if he doesn’t play well they don’t win.   New Orleans and SF aren’t nearly as one dimensional. 

BrainDed posted:

I think I'm going to have to root for the Bears in Week 17 when they play Vikings and I'm already feeling sick about it. 

As I said elsewhere, win the three non-Minnesota games and the Pack win the division on the divisional record tiebreak.  (Recall that Minnesohhhhhta already lost @CHI.)

Almost certainly going to be the #2 or #3 seed. Possibly the #6.

If they win both it's #2. If they lose to MN and beat Det (or vice versa) it's going to be #3.

Lose both and #6.

With this team I am not confident in any predictions.

If Packers lose both & Vikings lose to Bears, that puts both of them at 11-5....who wins tie breaker??

Packers do by virtue of better division record 4-2 vs. 3-3.

If Packers lose either or both of their next 2, they'll be facing Vikings in playoffs. 

Interesting to note, assuming the Saints win out at 13-3, Packers lose to Vikes but beat Lions, if Niners lose to Seattle & go 12-4, the Niners would be the 6 seed & face Green Bay in Lambeau. 

Screenshot_20191221-211838

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Screenshot_20191221-211838

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×