Skip to main content

Saw on Twitter that 39 years ago today, Fernando Valenzuela appeared on the cover of SI.

Here's his stats for the first 8 games he pitched his rookie season in 1981. (yes,he had 10 appearances in callup Sept 1980, but still officially a rook)

  • 8 games pitched
  • 8-0 record
  • 72 Innings
  • 7 Complete Games
  • 1 game he pitched 9, LA won in Extra Innings, he still gets the W
  • 5 Shutouts
  • 4 Earned Runs
  • 0.50 ERA

And, as usual with the SI Jinx, literally the day this cover hit 5/18, he lost his first game and lost his next 4 decisions with an ERA above 6 before getting hurt on 6/11... And became Exhibit A in the argument for managing pitch counts

But, my god, those 8 games are insane.  Even in his shutouts, they were tight games where LA won 2-0, 2-0, 1-0, 1-0, and 5-0.  No cheapies to be found...

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Aug 19, 1999.  Pedro Martinez struck out 11 in a win over Oakland.  For the next 9 games (spanning two seasons), he struck out more than 10 guys in each game (averaged 13 K/G).   Chris Sale came close with 8 in 2015.

In 2004, Ben Sheets pitched 237 innings.  His K/9 was 10 (264), and his W/9 was 1.2 (32).   

In Sept of '87, Teddy Higuera threw 32 consecutive scoreless innings.  

@El-Ka-Bong posted:

 

In 2004, Ben Sheets pitched 237 innings.  His K/9 was 10 (264), and his W/9 was 1.2 (32).   

 

Sheets did all that and had a win-loss record of 12-14. 

https://www.baseball-reference...mp;t=p&year=2004

He was charged for losses in games in which he gave up the following number of earned runs. He was charged with 6 losses in games in which he gave up 2 or less earned runs. Just from that he could have easily been something like 18-8 just from that. 

1. 3 earned runs in 7 2/3 innings

2. 3 earned runs in 8 innings

3. 2 earned runs in 8 innings

4. 4 earned runs in 6 innings

5. 0 earned runs in 7 innings

6. 2 earned runs in 7 innings

7. 5 earned runs in 5 2/3 innings

8. 4 earned run-in 7 innings

9. 4 earned runs in 8 innings

10. 6 earned runs in 6 innings

11. 2 earned runs in 7 innings

12. 2 earned runs in 8 innings

13. 3 earned runs in 6 innings

14. 1 earned run in 7 innings

Some of his no decisions were even more frustrating. 

1 earned run in 7 innings

0 earned runs in 6 innings, 

0 earned runs and 1 hit in 9 innings (Brewers won in 10 innings)

2 earned runs in 8 innigs

Should have been considered the best Brewer starting pitcher season in history (and probably was).

34 starts, 105 pitches/game, 31 starts of at least 6 innings. 

All for a shitty team. 

 

@antooo posted:

The Lynn Dickey of Brewer pitchers.

Dickey would have thrived in today's NFL because he had been seriously injured so many times he was gun shy (who could blame him). 

I think he'd be a Phillip Rivers type in today's NFL. He'd throw less interceptions in today's game and Dickey had a great arm.

Having said that, Sheets was a potential Hall of Fame level player. Can you imagine if he'd have played for a good team that would have had a decent bullpen and put up even a minimal amount of runs? He started to break down after that year because they overused him. That season alone he could have easily been something like 24-7 for a good team. 

Sheets had a 5 year stretch from 2004 to 2009 where he started 127 games. In those 127 games he averaged about 7 innings a start and struck out 785 batters (almost a batter an inning). His WHIP was 1.09 for those 5 years. It's not Pedro or Maddux, but it's basically what Gerritt Cole has for WHIP in his career. Sheets did all that to go 53-44. Sheets was more of a comparison for Gale Gillingham. Gillingham got to play the last year of so of Lombardi's tenure but then was a superstar level offensive lineman for what basically were crappy Green Bay teams. He should be a Hall of Famer, but barely gets mentioned even by Packer fans. 

If Sheets would have had that 5 year stretch with a team like the Yankees or the Red Sox, he would have been a perennial Cy Young candidate, he'd have stayed healthier because those teams would have had competent middle relievers to save some of the extra pitches in the 7th and 8th innings, and he might have put up another 6-8 years after that close to that level. 

Was a big fan of those 90s Atlanta Braves teams and their overall starting pitching was at times dominant.   The two year run by Greg Maddux referenced earlier was unbelievable.

I probably should have known this already but if you want to see impressive stats look up John Smoltz postseason numbers. 15-4 with an ERA of 2.67 and a WHIP of 1.144.  Take out one WS game against Cleveland where he only lasted 2 innings and his WHIP is likely under 1. 

Last edited by Tschmack

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×