Tavis Smiley posted:Vikings to rest starters tonight to avoid Seattle in Rd 1??
it could happen
I would. Absolutely.
MichiganPacker2 posted:How is the Seattle offense that much better than Green Bay's?
Right now? Better blockers, receivers, running backs and currently a better QB.....
All sorts of weirdness for the aftermath of tonight's game - given the Seattle shellacking of AZ right now, GB win tonight means Vikes at Lambeau next week.
cuqui posted:Hmmm
Yup. Looks like TomBoy got "Suh-ed". Glad that guy is no longer in our division.
Tyler Lockett for Seattle is a rookie 3rd rounder?
Man, his speed is electrifying to watch.
Lockett looks like Desmond Howard out there.
Seattle lost to the Rams last week. At home.
Arians is a moron if he doesn't bench his starters at halftime. Not only does his team have no shot at coming back, the Panthers are up by 21.
I just love how every team in the league plays the Packers like their lives depended on it
If Aaron Rodgers wants to remember what it's like to be an elite QB, he should watch film of Russell Wilson the last 10-11 weeks or so. A 109 passer rating this season with just OK offensive weapons around him. And that doesn't even factor in his rushing and scrambling abilities, that's just raw passing numbers. With Wilson playing like this, the days of having him cough up the ball 5 times in a playoff game are over.
This game illustrates what a lot of us have been saying about the Packers offensive plan- Seattle is shredding this defense with less talent than the Packers. Coffman is on his 3rd team, yet he's killing them. Kearse and Baldwin are not top shelf receivers. Seattle has no running game now. Yet they are designing plays that are getting people open and Wilson is hitting them.
bubbleboy789 posted:Seattle lost to the Rams last week. At home.
"Styles make fights." And, for whatever reason, Jeff Fisher teams have played Seattle as well as anyone the past 4 years...
Yep. It's not a good look on this staff at all. Just sad how easy it is for any defense(good or bad) to defend this offense. Man coverage with single high safety with the other safety playing in the box...piece of cake. Been seeing it the past 12 or so games and the Packers have had zero answers for it. None. They just keep thinking and hoping that these slow skill players will somehow start beating man coverage when they haven't done it all season. I've given up on expecting any adjustments/changes with the scheme/sets and pretty much go into every game expecting the offense to stink while we see lots of shots of Rodgers and MM looking frustrated/mad
IF (IF) Seattles talent is less then the Packers it surely is not by a big margin.
Who on the Pack is better? Other than #12
I wouldn't agree that they have no running game. May not be Beast Mode, but those two guys look like Beast Mode Lite. Seattle is definitely the club no one wants to face right now.
CAPackFan95 posted:bubbleboy789 posted:Seattle lost to the Rams last week. At home.
"Styles make fights." And, for whatever reason, Jeff Fisher teams have played Seattle as well as anyone the past 4 years...
I may also put the Rams as one of the league most underachieving teams this season. They have too many bad losses for the talent they have.
CAPackfan posted:Yep. It's not a good look on this staff at all. Just sad how easy it is for any defense(good or bad) to defend this offense. Man coverage with single high safety with the other safety playing in the box...piece of cake. Been seeing it the past 12 or so games and the Packers have had zero answers for it. None. They just keep thinking and hoping that these slow skill players will somehow start beating man coverage when they haven't done it all season. I've given up on expecting any adjustments/changes with the scheme/sets and pretty much go into every game expecting the offense to stink while we see lots of shots of Rodgers and MM looking frustrated/mad
Abbrederis needs to play more. Or play two TEs. Or play two FBs.
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity. How much worse could any these options be than Adams?
Lockett is the type of dynamic offensive player that the Packers need and Seattle has plenty of talent. They pretty clearly know how to utilize what they do have much better than the Packer coaching staff does.
chickenboy posted:I may also put the Rams as one of the league most underachieving teams this season. They have too many bad losses for the talent they have.
Disagree.
They have nothing at QB. They're right about where they should be without a QB. Welcome to the NFL
Seattle is on their 3rd or 4th running back this year. A guy who has been cut by 3 teams, including the Seahawks.
Their qb is arguably playing the best in the NFL right now. That's something I never would have thought a year ago.
San Diego takes the lead. What an incredible comeback it would be for the Chiefs if they take the AFC West.
Antonio Gates one-hand catches a shot put pass for the score, wow
Schneider, McKenzie, Dorsey all having a great year. Eliott Wolf stock could be very high. Bevell will be a busy guy this winter.
Eliot not going anywhere. No GM position is worth more than Green Bay's
So true. The one GM that doesn't have to answer to an owner.
Boris posted:Eliot not going anywhere. No GM position is worth more than Green Bay's
That's what we thought about the first 3 guys.
Not like this....Other guys aren't getting any younger. Eliot isn't even 40 yet.
Maybe Eliot would rather not be GM in the place where his father is a legend doing the same job. It's possible.
The popular belief around Packer Country is that Jon Schneider is going to return after TT's departure.
I don't see why he'd leave his current gig, TBH, unless it really is his lifelong goal to GM the Packers.
I read, I think in the GBPG, that Schneider has an escape clause in his contract that allows him to return to GB as GM. If true, that's significant.
michiganjoe posted:Lockett is the type of dynamic offensive player that the Packers need and Seattle has plenty of talent. They pretty clearly know how to utilize what they do have much better than the Packer coaching staff does.
Yep....it's a complete mystery how they have lost 6 games this year, and blown a 4th quarter lead in every loss. Maybe their staff forgot how to utilize their talent in those losses.
If Thompson is hanging them up- that's probably the only plausible scenario. And it would be apropos that Thompson would just go, and not tell anyone, no fanfare, no ceremony...
Maybe Thompson will address the team with a "Win one for the Gipper" speech.
How did Peyton end up coming in for the Broncos. I wasn't watching....
YATittle posted:How did Peyton end up coming in for the Broncos. I wasn't watching....
They needed a spark.....Tollzzzzzien may play that role tonite