…because it’s football.
…because I know Dolphins are mammals you ass.
…because Thursday is Ethel Barrymore drag night for Fedya
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
You're real confident giving the Fowl a 13 ain't you.
I'm in first place. You should follow my lead....so to speak.
For the uninitiated, ammo is referencing the Isbell to Hutson pool.
I figured BK was busy looking for his Roger Zatkoff rookie card.
Attachments
Images (1)
Yeah, wasn't it just last year that the Dolphins were being touted as a young, talented team that was going to be capable of competing in their division and possibly playoffs?
@Blair Kiel posted:I'm in first place. You should follow my lead....so to speak.
For the uninitiated, ammo is referencing the Isbell to Hutson pool.
Actually I was refering to the Pick'um Pool. And as I type this Miami just ties it up. You going down tonight.
A lot of teams are terrible when their backup QB starts and/or plays regularly.
On offense, add Parker, Fuller, Hurns and Malcolm Brown, along with Tua and they are much better.
During that “Halftime Preview” they just showed, Greg Olsen started to mention “the greatest Russian QB” before being cut off. Anyone know who he was referring to?
Ummmmm.
He was with Michael Vick, so...... "Rushin' QB"?
Crazy guess.
Hmmmm. Was pretty certain there was gonna be a segment on Igor Chernolutsky.
By the way, thanks for the clarification ya’ nitwits. But it was a joke. 
Joke Rule #1 at X4.
If you have to explain your joke, it was probably written by Fedya.
Two gentiles bump into each other at a street corner. The first gentile says to the second gentile, “Hey, you own that business up the street, right? How’s business been lately?” The second gentile says, “Great!”
@PackLandVA posted:Two gentiles bump into each other at a street corner. The first gentile says to the second gentile, “Hey, you own that business up the street, right? How’s business been lately?” The second gentile says, “Great!”
Huh?
Back to the game.
Dolphins giving the Ravens all kinds of holy Hell.
Tua definitely has skillz, he just seems fragile, a victim of bad luck or both.
Too bad that couldn't have been a TD.
I am glad he didn't hurt himself landing head first. Some of the replay angles looks like he compressed his neck pretty hard. With a LOT of weight!
@lovepack posted:Miami playcalling is awesome
Nobody ever expects the screen pass to the guard.
The Dolphins defense can be pretty good. Andrew Van Ginkel making his mark even.
That was crazy play!
Live, I thought the Ravens WR got his helmet knocked off, but realized it was the ball watching the recovery. Haven't seen a good replay of the lateral, but it was a heads-up play.
Good for the Dolphins, too! They have been playing inspired defense.
Lamar Jackson looks like shit tonight …
Who would ever write the following:
"Lamar Jackson looks as bad as Patrick Mahomes."
Now that there seems to be so many camera angles, slo-mo, and other technology, the refs/umps/officials in all the major sports are looking pretty incompetent. The gameplay is just too fast for the naked eye to be responsible for watching so much. Lots of very questionable calls and non-calls every game, every week. NFL needs to figure something out, especially with penalties.
The high flying unstoppable Ravens stopped dead in their tracks.
Double dagger!
WTH is up with Miami's stadium? Looks like an arena league field.
@PackLandVA posted:Now that there seems to be so many camera angles, slo-mo, and other technology, the refs/umps/officials in all the major sports are looking pretty incompetent. The gameplay is just too fast for the naked eye to be responsible for watching so much. Lots of very questionable calls and non-calls every game, every week. NFL needs to figure something out, especially with penalties.
By and large, I still think NFL refs do a pretty good job at putting themselves in the correct position to make a 'basic' calls (in/out of bounds, offsides, legal formations/motions, ineligible receivers, etc.).
The main problem lie in the subjective calls (PI, holding, legal reception, runner down before a fumble, etc.), and these are compounded when the phantom and/or inconsistent calls come into play.
Some of this can be overcome via challenge or automatic review, but the majority of them can't. If other plays are added to review eligibility, it's likely to increase game times, and the league avoids that like the plague.
I do think there is a place where modern technology could (would?) be helpful. Surely there's a way to use sensors of some sort to determine first downs, whether a player steps OOB on a run, reception, or return, end zone penetration, and so forth.
Might be fun to see...
Chip the ball, goal lines, sidelines. Then create the software to provide instant decisions.